Tayisiya Morderger vs Nika Radisic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W L L L L L L
Form
L L L W L W L W L LHead-to-head: Morderger 0 - 1 Radisic
They have played 2 sets in total, with Morderger winning 0 and Radisic winning 2. The last match between Morderger and Radisic was at the W75 Prague, 16-02-2025, Q1 round, I.hard with Nika Radisic getting the victory 6-0 6-3.
W75 Prague(16-02-2025)
6
0
6
3
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Lamens VS Uchijima PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Zarazua VS Krueger PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-3 |
Stats 
Nika Radisic
Player
Tayisiya Morderger
44%
(
21 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
Stats
0
H2H Matches
1
0
Sets Won
2
3
Games Won
12
1
Aces (Total)
3
5
Total Double Faults
0
1:27:14
Average Match Time
1:27:14
55% (34/62)
1st Serve %
44% (21/48)
53% (18/34)
1st Serve Win %
67% (14/21)
32% (9/28)
2nd Serve Win %
63% (17/27)
13% (1/8)
Break Points Won % (Total)
43% (6/14)
35% (17/48)
Return Points Win %
56% (35/62)
0% (0/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (1/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (0/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tayisiya Morderger vs Nika Radisic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Tayisiya Morderger 0 - 1 Nika Radisic
- Recent Trends in Second Serve Performance: In the past six months, there has been a discernible disparity in the proficiency of Morderger and Radisic in terms of points won on their second serves. Morderger has achieved a commendable success rate of 43.97%, while Radisic's figure stands at a slightly lower 40.09%. It is worth noting that a strong correlation can be observed between this statistical aspect and the precision of match predictions.
- Analysis of Return Game Statistics: Another crucial factor to consider is the return game statistics, which reveal Morderger's recent form in winning an impressive 57.87% of their opponent's second serve points. In contrast, Radisic has managed to secure 51.1% in this regard. Turning our attention to first serve returns, Morderger has a success rate of 30.46%, whereas Radisic has achieved 39.28%. These statistics carry significant weight in determining the favorite in the highly anticipated head-to-head (H2H) matchup.
- Under Pressure Examination: In moments of intense pressure, Morderger has exhibited resilience by saving an impressive 50.36% of breakpoints in recent matches. Conversely, Radisic's performance in this area has been slightly less impressive, with a saving rate of 36.36%. This statistical insight proves to be valuable when making predictions for in-game betting.
- Performance Overview: By examining the overall performance of the past year, Morderger has emerged victorious in 44.19% of their matches (with a win-loss record of 19/24). Similarly, Radisic boasts a success rate of 44.44% (with a win-loss record of 20/25). These figures provide a comprehensive overview for predicting the outcome of their head-to-head encounter.
- Identifying the Best Surface: When it comes to surface preference, it is worth highlighting that Morderger has achieved their highest career win percentage on Clay, with a remarkable 57% success rate (W/L 225/169). Conversely, their performance on Indoor Hard courts has been less favorable, with a win percentage of 47% (W/L 46/51). As for Radisic, Clay has also proven to be their preferred surface, with a win percentage of 56% (W/L 174/137), while Indoor Hard courts have presented a challenge, with a win percentage of 39% (W/L 7/11).
- Assessment of Player Level: Over the past year, Morderger has predominantly competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments with prize money exceeding $10K, achieving a commendable 43.9% success rate (W/L 18/23). On the other hand, Radisic has similarly been active in Challengers/ITF tournaments with prize money exceeding $10K, securing a 44.44% victory rate (W/L 20/25). It is essential to note that when comparing the statistical prowess of the players, the level of the event at which they have competed significantly impacts the prediction of the favorite.
- Opponent Quality Analysis: An additional aspect that should not be overlooked is the level of competition faced by the players in the past 12 months. Morderger has encountered opponents with an average rank of 348.44, while Radisic's opponents have possessed an average rank of 367.09.
- Performance in Deciding Sets: For those avidly interested in live predictions and betting, the performance of the players in deciding sets becomes a key consideration. Over the past 12 months, Morderger has triumphed in 38% of deciding sets, while Radisic has achieved a victory rate of 36% in all their matches played on the professional tour.
- Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: While past player performance can yield valuable insights in predicting tennis matches, it is imperative to delve into the current event statistics to assess the players' current form. To access the up-to-date information on player performance in the ongoing event, please refer to the section below (assuming both players have participated in matches within the current event). Additionally, it is worth considering that certain players showcase enhanced performance at specific events, which should be taken into account when predicting the ultimate outcome.
- Break Point Conversion: In recent matches, Morderger has demonstrated exceptional proficiency in capitalizing on breakpoint opportunities, converting 50% of such instances. In comparison, Radisic has converted 42.47% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. This statistic proves highly informative for making in-game live betting decisions when either player finds themselves in a breakpoint situation.
- If you possess a keen interest in employing models that accurately predict tennis matches, this article provides an excellent starting point (Warning: This article caters specifically to statistics enthusiasts).
Tayisiya Morderger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Urszula Radwanska
Player
Tayisiya Morderger
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Francesca Curmi
Player
Tayisiya Morderger
73%
(
59 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nika Radisic
Player
Tayisiya Morderger
44%
(
21 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aneta Laboutkova
Player
Tayisiya Morderger
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
6
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
4
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
86
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Urszula Radwanska
Player
Tayisiya Morderger
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
7
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ana Konjuh
Player
Tayisiya Morderger
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tayisiya Morderger
Player
Anna Gabric
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
13 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
54
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Iva Primorac
Player
Tayisiya Morderger
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marie Benoit
Player
Tayisiya Morderger
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
52%
(
51 of
99)
2
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
3
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
99)
89
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Milana Zhabrailova
Player
Tayisiya Morderger
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
43%
(
23 of
54)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Nika Radisic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Marie Villet
Player
Nika Radisic
49%
(
21 of
43)
1st Serve %
46%
(
13 of
28)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
62%
(
13 of
21)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
40%
(
17 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
40
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anastasiia Sobolieva
Player
Nika Radisic
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nika Radisic
Player
Tayisiya Morderger
44%
(
21 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yuliya Hatouka
Player
Nika Radisic
59%
(
56 of
95)
1st Serve %
52%
(
46 of
88)
1
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
5
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
46 of
88)
100
Total Points Won
83
|
6-0 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nika Radisic
Player
Oriana Gniewkowska
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariam Bolkvadze
Player
Nika Radisic
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
78
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nika Radisic
Player
Min Liu
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zhibek Kulambayeva
Player
Nika Radisic
77%
(
88 of
115)
1st Serve %
68%
(
57 of
84)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
60%
(
53 of
88)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
47 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
105
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlota Martinez Cirez
Player
Nika Radisic
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(6) 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Beatrice Ricci
Player
Nika Radisic
61%
(
62 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
70 of
110)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
6
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
73%
(
11 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
48%
(
49 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
59 of
110)
112
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(5) 7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
57% (346/264)
Win/Loss
54% (188/159)
57% (765/587)
Sets Win/Loss
55% (424/353)
54% (6491/5583)
Games Win/Loss
53% (3620/3253)
56% (24/19)
Hard Win/Loss
40% (6/9)
57% (225/169)
Clay Win/Loss
56% (174/137)
56% (97/76)
Indoor Hard W/L
38% (8/13)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.1
Aces Per Game
0.09
601
Aces Total
294
0.22
Double Faults Per Game
0.18
1311
Total Double Faults
600
1st Match
Average Match Time
1:28:9
559.34
Average Opponent Rank
471.37
55% (13629/24582)
1st Serve %
65% (12744/19577)
63% (8595/13629)
1st Serve Win %
57% (7238/12744)
44% (4862/10953)
2nd Serve Win %
47% (3201/6833)
51% (1562/3078)
Break Points Won % (Total)
48% (1237/2552)
47% (11257/23996)
Return Points Win %
47% (9106/19377)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/1)
25% (2/6)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/2)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
49% (158/164)
Challenger W/L
52% (128/116)
66% (186/94)
Futures W/L
60% (60/40)
57% (342/604)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
55% (185/339)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/3)
52% (57/110)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
59% (26/44)
44% (61/138)
Deciding Set Win %
44% (37/85)
87% (361/315)
1st Set Won, Won Match
86% (198/170)
12% (361/45)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
14% (198/28)
12% (249/30)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
12% (149/18)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
