Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tatiana Pieri vs Margot Yerolymos Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Pieri vs Yerolymos analysis and find out who is favored!
Tatiana Pieri vs Margot Yerolymos Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pieri has won 46.79% of points on his second serve, while Yerolymos has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pieri, in recent form, has won 57.27% of his opponent's second serve points, while Yerolymos has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 44.16% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Pieri has saved 55.19% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Yerolymos has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Pieri has won 63.64% of matches played (W/L 42/ 24), with Yerolymos winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Pieri has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 206/ 154), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 41% (W/L 15/ 22). Yerolymos has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 39/ 20), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 49/ 54).
- Player level: In the last year, Pieri has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.64% of matches (W/L 42/ 24), where as Yerolymos has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Pieri winning 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Pieri winning 0 and Yerolymos winning 4. The last match between Pieri and Yerolymos was at the W25 Santa Margherita Di Pula, 01-04-2019, Q1 round, Clay with Margot Yerolymos getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Pieri and Yerolymos have played a deciding set 0 times, with Pieri winning 0 times and Yerolymos 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Pieri winning 0, and Yerolymos 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pieri has played against opponents with an average rank of 269.45 while Yerolymos has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pieri has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Yerolymos has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Pieri has converted 53.02% of breakpoint opportunities, and Yerolymos has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Pieri 0 - 2 Yerolymos
458
Rank
449
High
25
Age
Plays
0
Total2
0
Hard0
0
Clay2
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
858
Rank
306
High
26
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
56% (234-187)
Career Total W/L
57% (246-183)
67% (14-7)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$22,359
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Tatiana Pieri | Margot Yerolymos |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 4 |
| Games Won | 14 | 25 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:0:0 | 1:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (61/97) | 52% (38/73) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 52% (32/61) | 55% (21/38) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (16/36) | 63% (22/35) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 28% (5/18) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (30/73) | 51% (49/97) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 | |||||
| 7-6(2) 6-3 |
Stats 
Margot Yerolymos
Player
Tatiana Pieri
52%
(
38 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
49 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
78
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tatiana Pieri | Margot Yerolymos |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (14/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (31/19) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (261/203) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (14/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.07 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 15 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 42 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:32:28 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 269.14 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (837/1291) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 58% (482/837) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (213/454) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 53% (95/179) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 49% (624/1279) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (14/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (14/21) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 63% (5/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (13/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (13/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (8/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Tatiana Pieri Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Anastasiya Soboleva
Player
Tatiana Pieri
72%
(
90 of
125)
1st Serve %
73%
(
69 of
94)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
2
54%
(
49 of
90)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
34%
(
12 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
51%
(
64 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
52 of
94)
113
Total Points Won
106
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tatiana Pieri
Player
Aurora Zantedeschi
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
49%
(
32 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tatiana Pieri
Player
Anouk Koevermans
73%
(
100 of
137)
1st Serve %
63%
(
67 of
107)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
10
57%
(
57 of
100)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
47%
(
64 of
137)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
107)
126
Total Points Won
118
|
6-4 6-7(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tatiana Pieri
Player
Sapfo Sakellaridi
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
44%
(
31 of
70)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tatiana Pieri
Player
Giulia Carbonaro
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve %
47%
(
17 of
36)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
51
Total Points Won
18
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 4-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Martina Colmegna
Player
Tatiana Pieri
83%
(
65 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
46 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tatiana Pieri
Player
Lucie Havlickova
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carlota Martinez Cirez
Player
Tatiana Pieri
50%
(
27 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
35 of
67)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tatiana Pieri
Player
Oana Gavrila
51%
(
40 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
46%
(
36 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
40 of
70)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Margot Yerolymos Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Flavie Brugnone
Player
Margot Yerolymos
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
55%
(
60 of
110)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
110)
102
Total Points Won
90
|
6-2 6-7(6) 10-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mallaurie Noel
Player
Margot Yerolymos
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
67)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Margot Yerolymos
Player
Ivonne Cavalle-Reimers
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Margot Yerolymos
Player
Jenny Lim
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
89)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
26%
(
6 of
23)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
89)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Margot Yerolymos
Player
Amira Ben Aissa
49%
(
21 of
43)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Margot Yerolymos
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Margot Yerolymos
Player
Veronika Podrez
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Margot Yerolymos
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve %
47%
(
20 of
43)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mirra Andreeva
Player
Margot Yerolymos
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
75)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sara Cakarevic
Player
Margot Yerolymos
76%
(
71 of
94)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
77)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
9
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
30%
(
7 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
47%
(
44 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Pieri Vs Yerolymos Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
