Tathiana Garbin vs Anabel Medina Garrigues Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L W L L L L
Form
L L L L W W L L W LHead-2-Head: Garbin 1 - 7 Garrigues
They have played 19 sets in total, with Garbin winning 6 and Garrigues winning 13. The last match between Garbin and Garrigues was at the Wimbledon - London, 25-06-2009, Round: Second, Surface: Grass, with Anabel Medina Garrigues getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tathiana Garbin | 1 |
| Anabel Medina Garrigues | 7 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Wimbledon - London(25-06-2009)
Anabel Medina Garrigues
Tathiana Garbin
7
6
6
3
| Garbin | Stats | Garrigues |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 7 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 22 | Highest Rank | 16 |
| 47 | Age | 42 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 5 | Titles | 14 |
| 53% (321-283) | Career Total W/L | 55% (400-322) |
| $759,955 | Career Prize Money | $1,945,406 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 4 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 2 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Brancaccio VS Erjavec PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
22 May 2025 / Q2 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Basilashvili VS Vacherot PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris atp
21 May 2025 / Q2 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 6-3 |
Stats 
Anabel Medina Garrigues
Player
Tathiana Garbin
82%
(
54 of
66)
1st Serve %
72%
(
50 of
69)
2
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
| 6-0 3-6 6-0 | |||||
| 3-6 7-5 2-2 ret. |
Stats
Anabel Medina Garrigues
Player
Tathiana Garbin
68%
(
63 of
93)
1st Serve %
71%
(
68 of
96)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
41 of
68)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
44%
(
41 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
94
Total Points Won
95
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 | |||||
| 6-3 1-6 7-5 |
Stats
Anabel Medina Garrigues
Player
Tathiana Garbin
61%
(
66 of
108)
1st Serve %
55%
(
55 of
100)
1
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
3
52%
(
34 of
66)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
36%
(
15 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
14 of
45)
90%
(
9 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
55%
(
59 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
51 of
100)
100
Total Points Won
108
|
||||
| 6-2 6-4 | |||||
| 6-1 6-2 | |||||
| 6-4 2-6 6-3 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 7 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 13 |
| 81 | Games Won | 95 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 65% (173/265) | 1st Serve % | 69% (183/267) |
| 64% (111/173) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (113/183) |
| 40% (37/92) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (37/84) |
| 39% (14/36) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (15/29) |
| 44% (117/267) | Return Points Win % | 44% (117/265) |
| 14% (1/7) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 86% (6/7) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/3) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (3/3) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (6/6) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (6/0) |
| 0% (6/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tathiana Garbin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Marion Bartoli
Player
Tathiana Garbin
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve %
54%
(
19 of
35)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
52
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jarmila Wolfe
Player
Tathiana Garbin
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Anastasija Sevastova
Player
Tathiana Garbin
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
79)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tathiana Garbin
Player
Chanelle Scheepers
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
87)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
46%
(
29 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
87)
77
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Coco Vandeweghe
Player
Tathiana Garbin
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
70%
(
46 of
66)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
0
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF | 7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 1-0 ret. | H2H | |||
view more
Anabel Medina Garrigues Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Tereza Smitkova
Player
Anabel Medina Garrigues
78%
(
50 of
64)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anabel Medina Garrigues
Player
Jade Suvrijn
64%
(
67 of
104)
1st Serve %
64%
(
89 of
138)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
46 of
89)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
27%
(
6 of
22)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
40%
(
42 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
67 of
138)
129
Total Points Won
113
|
6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Anabel Medina Garrigues
71%
(
61 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
67 of
103)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
45 of
67)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
35 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alla Kudryavtseva
Player
Anabel Medina Garrigues
72%
(
68 of
95)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
40%
(
38 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Anabel Medina Garrigues
Player
Gioia Barbieri
64%
(
74 of
116)
1st Serve %
67%
(
70 of
105)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
46%
(
34 of
74)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
50%
(
11 of
22)
Break Points Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
51%
(
59 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
60 of
105)
117
Total Points Won
104
|
6-2 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anabel Medina Garrigues
Player
Olga Govortsova
50%
(
42 of
84)
1st Serve %
57%
(
52 of
92)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lourdes Dominguez-Lino
Player
Anabel Medina Garrigues
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
52%
(
17 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
46%
(
27 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Francoise Abanda
Player
Anabel Medina Garrigues
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
73%
(
48 of
66)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
83
Total Points Won
62
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53% (321/283) | Win/Loss | 55% (400/322) |
| 53% (735/646) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (911/743) |
| 51% (6456/6188) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (7850/7235) |
| 49% (110/115) | Hard Win/Loss | 47% (131/145) |
| 59% (185/128) | Clay Win/Loss | 65% (220/119) |
| 46% (21/25) | Indoor Hard W/L | 47% (32/36) |
| 25% (5/15) | Grass Win/Loss | 44% (17/22) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 312 | Aces Total | 441 |
| 0.07 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.08 |
| 413 | Total Double Faults | 567 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 449.07 | Average Opponent Rank | 470.81 |
| 61% (7018/11446) | 1st Serve % | 65% (17266/26633) |
| 60% (4187/7018) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (10415/17266) |
| 45% (1992/4430) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (4413/9372) |
| 45% (612/1369) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1630/3415) |
| 44% (5037/11452) | Return Points Win % | 45% (12659/27827) |
| 46% (39/45) | Slam W/L | 47% (45/50) |
| 40% (39/58) | Masters W/L | 46% (62/73) |
| 57% (4/3) | Cups W/L | 43% (10/13) |
| 51% (147/141) | Main Tour W/L | 59% (245/173) |
| 75% (76/26) | Challenger W/L | 75% (38/13) |
| 55% (320/587) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (391/707) |
| 0% (0/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 83% (5/6) |
| 55% (71/129) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (69/132) |
| 52% (98/187) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (99/215) |
| 85% (323/275) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (407/344) |
| 14% (323/44) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (407/61) |
| 17% (279/48) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (315/52) |
Garbin vs. Garrigues Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
