Prediction of Taro Daniel [123rd] vs Tyler Zink [374th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W L L W L L L
Form
L W W W W L L W L LHead-2-Head: Daniel 1 - 0 Zink
They have played 2 sets in total, with Daniel winning 2 and Zink winning 0. The last match between Daniel and Zink was at the San Diego Challenger, 26-02-2025, First, Hard with Taro Daniel getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Taro Daniel | 1 |
| Tyler Zink | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Taro Daniel
Player
Tyler Zink
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 8 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:15:7 | Average Match Time | 1:15:7 |
| 62% (33/53) | 1st Serve % | 56% (35/63) |
| 85% (28/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (23/35) |
| 65% (13/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 57% (16/28) |
| 40% (2/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/3) |
| 38% (24/63) | Return Points Win % | 23% (12/53) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Taro Daniel vs Tyler Zink Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Daniel 1 - 0 Zink
Editorial Prediction:
In recent months, Daniel has demonstrated a strong performance on his second serve, winning 53.2% of points, while Zink has closely followed with 52.24%. This statistic correlates significantly with match outcome predictions, providing a clear edge in foresight for this matchup.
Analyzing return game efficiency over the same period, Daniel has claimed success in 50.96% of his opponents' second serve points, with Zink trailing slightly at 49.79%. Notably, their first serve return stats show that Zink has excelled, securing 33.59% compared to Daniel's 24.57%, suggesting a potential favor towards Zink in this head-to-head encounter.
Under pressure, Zink has saved 64.13% of breakpoints, marginally outperforming Daniel's 63.91%. This minor difference can influence in-game betting predictions significantly, particularly during pivotal match moments. When it comes to converting breakpoint opportunities, Zink again has the upper hand with a conversion rate of 43.28%, compared to Daniel's 38.95%.
Over the past year, Zink has exhibited superior overall performance, winning 70.91% of his matches (39/16), while Daniel has won only 43.1% (25/33). This dominance is reflected in their tournament levels as well; Daniel has primarily participated in Main tour events, with a win rate of 33.33% (7/14), whereas Zink has competed mostly in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, boasting a robust 75.56% (34/11).
Regarding surfaces, Daniel excels on clay, with a career win rate of 60% (304/202), while Zink's best performances have been on indoor hard courts, winning 62% (16/10). However, their performances on less favorable surfaces, such as Daniel's 32% win rate on grass and Zink's 54% on hard courts, should also be considered when evaluating their potential outcomes.
Considering the quality of opponents faced, Daniel has consistently played against tougher competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 154.33, compared to Zink's average opponent rank of 447.49. In deciding sets, Zink has shown remarkable resilience, claiming victory in 76% of matches, overshadowing Daniel's 43% win rate in such scenarios over the past year.
Based on current statistics and analysis, the data suggests that Zink holds a favorable position to win this match, given his superior win rates, breakpoint efficiencies, and performance under pressure compared to Daniel.
Taro Daniel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Taro Daniel
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Darwin Blanch
Player
Taro Daniel
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
43 of
51)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
23 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
97
Total Points Won
69
|
6-7(8) 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Taro Daniel
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
11
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Mathis Bondaz
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Radu Albot
Player
Taro Daniel
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
104)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
104)
99
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eliot Spizzirri
Player
Taro Daniel
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
104)
103
Total Points Won
84
|
6-7(2) 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Alex Rybakov
56%
(
58 of
103)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
58%
(
26 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
31%
(
32 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
87)
100
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(9) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Tyler Zink
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Taro Daniel
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Taro Daniel
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
70%
(
89 of
128)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
54 of
89)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
26%
(
23 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
52 of
128)
116
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(4) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Tyler Zink Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
Tyler Zink
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
4
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
Jack Kennedy
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
8
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
Tyler Zink
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Tyler Zink
42%
(
25 of
60)
1st Serve %
38%
(
25 of
66)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
92%
(
23 of
25)
69%
(
24 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
Alfredo Perez
55%
(
42 of
77)
1st Serve %
49%
(
31 of
63)
4
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
3
90%
(
38 of
42)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
20 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
Aidan Mayo
54%
(
58 of
108)
1st Serve %
48%
(
37 of
77)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
9
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
60%
(
30 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
38%
(
41 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
77)
96
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
Rafael De Alba
43%
(
26 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
9
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
Rafael De Alba
43%
(
26 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
9
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Tyler Zink
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (573/421) | Win/Loss | 55% (78/64) |
| 56% (1316/1033) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (169/154) |
| 52% (11470/10587) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (1586/1523) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.39 |
| 2467 | Aces Total | 592 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 1994 | Total Double Faults | 299 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:32:37 |
| 483.85 | Average Opponent Rank | 436.32 |
| 63% (35491/56755) | 1st Serve % | 59% (5218/8833) |
| 68% (24080/35491) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (3657/5218) |
| 51% (10829/21255) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (1830/3615) |
| 43% (2402/5588) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (318/817) |
| 39% (21978/55972) | Return Points Win % | 38% (3200/8483) |
| 59% (549/934) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (77/141) |
| 27% (13/49) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (162/307) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 43% (17/40) |
| 50% (148/297) | Deciding Set Win % | 65% (26/40) |
| 84% (590/498) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (79/70) |
| 15% (590/91) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (79/9) |
| 18% (404/72) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (63/8) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
