MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

Tanguy Genier vs Tristan Berard Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

By Wojtek Kolan

Head-to-head: Genier 1 - 0 Berard

They have played 2 sets in total, with Genier winning 2 and Berard winning 0. The last match between Genier and Berard was at the M15 Lannion, 16-02-2025, Q1 round, I.hard with Tanguy Genier getting the victory 6-4 6-4.

M15 Lannion(16-02-2025)

Stats
50% (4-4)
YTD Win/Loss
54% (7-6)
1
Head-to-Head
0
N/A
Ranking
N/A
Highest Rank
27
Age
20
-
Plays
-
0
Titles
0
47% (48-54)
Career Total W/L
46% (11-13)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
0
Hard H2H
0
0
Clay H2H
0
1
Indoor H2H
0
0
Grass H2H
0

Today’s Tennis Tips:

Rune VS Medvedev PREDICTION Hard

BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp

14 Mar 2025 / Semifinals

ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE

Daniil Medvedev

To Win

64.9 %
2.01%

Draper VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Hard

BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp

15 Mar 2025 / Semifinals

ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE

Jack Draper

To Win

30.95 %
9.3%

Genier VS Berard H2H Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-4 6-4
cross
Tanguy Genier
Player
Tristan Berard
73% ( 37 of 51)
1st Serve %
59% ( 40 of 68)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
84% ( 31 of 37)
1st Serve Won
80% ( 32 of 40)
71% ( 10 of 14)
2nd Serve Won
32% ( 9 of 28)
40% ( 2 of 5)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
20% ( 10 of 51)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 27 of 68)
68
Total Points Won
51

Genier VS Berard H2H Stats

Tanguy Genier Genier
Stats
Tristan Berard Berard
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
12
Games Won
8
4
Aces (Total)
4
2
Total Double Faults
3
1:28:17
Average Match Time
1:28:17
73% (37/51)
1st Serve %
59% (40/68)
84% (31/37)
1st Serve Win %
80% (32/40)
71% (10/14)
2nd Serve Win %
32% (9/28)
40% (2/5)
Break Points Won % (Total)
0% (0/0)
40% (27/68)
Return Points Win %
20% (10/51)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Tanguy Genier vs Tristan Berard Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Tanguy Genier 1 - 0 Tristan Berard

Prediction Insights for an Upcoming Tennis Match:
  1. Recent Performance on Second Serve: Analyzing their recent form over the past six months, Genier has exhibited a second serve winning rate of 46.44%, whereas Berard has achieved a slightly better rate of 49.66%. This particular statistic shows a remarkable correlation to the accuracy of match predictions.
  2. Return Game Stats: Delving into return stats of both players in recent form, Genier has managed to triumph in 45.28% of their opponent's second serve points. Comparatively, Berard has achieved a winning rate of 44.72%. For first serve returns, Genier boasts a success rate of 29.18% while Berard stands at 36.36%. These figures play a significant role in determining the favored player in this head-to-head matchup.
  3. Under Pressure Analysis: Evaluating their ability to handle pressure situations, Genier has shown great resilience by saving 69.29% of breakpoints in recent matches. In contrast, Berard has managed to save 54.76%. This particular statistic serves as a valuable tool in predicting in-game betting outcomes.
  4. Performance Overview: Looking at their performance over the past year, Genier has won 46.67% of matches played, boasting a win/loss record of 21/24. Similarly, Berard has achieved a win rate of 46.67%, with a win/loss record of 7/8. These numbers provide an overarching prediction overview for this head-to-head clash.
  5. Surface Suitability: Analyzing the players' career records on different surfaces, Genier has excelled on hard courts, winning 49% of their matches (W/L21/22), while performing comparatively worse on clay, with a win rate of 44% (W/L14/18). On the other hand, Berard has displayed their best career win percentage on hard courts, standing at 60% (W/L3/2), but has struggled on clay, winning 0% of matches (W/L0/4).
  6. Player Level: Over the last year, Genier has primarily competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a $10K prize, achieving a 50% victory rate (W/L20/20). Conversely, Berard has participated in similar events, winning 46.67% of matches (W/L7/8). When comparing player statistics to determine the favorite, it is crucial to consider the level at which they have been competing.
  7. Quality of Opponents: Throughout the past twelve months, Genier has faced opponents with an average rank of 239.38, whereas Berard has encountered players with an average rank of 148.4.
  8. Deciding Set Performance: For those intrigued by live predictions and betting, in the past year, Genier has emerged victorious in 38% of deciding sets. In comparison, Berard has claimed victory in 50% of all matches played on the tour. These figures hold relevance if the match extends to a deciding set.
  9. Current Event H2H Stats: Although prior player performance is valuable in predicting tennis matches, one should also consider current event stats to ascertain which players are currently in form. To access the relevant section for this information, kindly refer to the section below (applicable only if the players have already competed in the ongoing event). Additionally, individual players may demonstrate superior performance at certain events, making it pertinent to take this factor into account when making outcome predictions.
  10. Break Point Conversion: Recent data reveals that Genier has capitalized on 42.62% of breakpoint opportunities, while Berard has converted 30.3% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. This statistic assumes particular significance in live in-game betting scenarios, especially when either player faces a breakpoint opportunity.
  11. If you are interested in exploring predictive models for tennis matches, this article provides an excellent starting point. (Warning: Intended for statistical enthusiasts)

Tanguy Genier Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
Q1
cross
Clement Kubiak
Player
Tanguy Genier
45% ( 19 of 42)
1st Serve %
70% ( 31 of 44)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
95% ( 18 of 19)
1st Serve Won
84% ( 26 of 31)
70% ( 16 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
69% ( 9 of 13)
0% ( 0 of 0)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
19% ( 8 of 42)
Rtn Points Won
20% ( 9 of 44)
43
Total Points Won
43
L
7-6(5) 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Alessandro Pecci
Player
Tanguy Genier
54% ( 35 of 65)
1st Serve %
52% ( 28 of 54)
7
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
83% ( 29 of 35)
1st Serve Won
71% ( 20 of 28)
57% ( 17 of 30)
2nd Serve Won
54% ( 14 of 26)
50% ( 2 of 4)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 6)
29% ( 19 of 65)
Rtn Points Won
37% ( 20 of 54)
66
Total Points Won
53
L
6-4 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Tanguy Genier
Player
Michele Ribecai
63% ( 40 of 63)
1st Serve %
60% ( 36 of 60)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
70% ( 28 of 40)
1st Serve Won
72% ( 26 of 36)
61% ( 14 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 10 of 24)
43% ( 3 of 7)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
33% ( 21 of 63)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 24 of 60)
66
Total Points Won
57
W
6-4 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Tanguy Genier
Player
Tymur Bieldiugin
55% ( 27 of 49)
1st Serve %
65% ( 31 of 48)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
78% ( 21 of 27)
1st Serve Won
71% ( 22 of 31)
45% ( 10 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 7 of 17)
50% ( 2 of 4)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
37% ( 18 of 49)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 19 of 48)
50
Total Points Won
47
W
4-6 6-3 10-0 H2H
Q1
cross
Tanguy Genier
Player
Ilan Hediger
68% ( 40 of 59)
1st Serve %
60% ( 52 of 86)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
90% ( 36 of 40)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 34 of 52)
42% ( 8 of 19)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 17 of 34)
27% ( 3 of 11)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
25% ( 15 of 59)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 35 of 86)
79
Total Points Won
66
W
6-7(4) 6-3 10-6 H2H
QF
cross
Moritz Hoffmann
Player
Tanguy Genier
51% ( 28 of 55)
1st Serve %
57% ( 31 of 54)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
86% ( 24 of 28)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 21 of 31)
52% ( 14 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 9 of 23)
50% ( 3 of 6)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
31% ( 17 of 55)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 24 of 54)
62
Total Points Won
47
L
6-3 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Tanguy Genier
Player
Tristan Berard
73% ( 37 of 51)
1st Serve %
59% ( 40 of 68)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
84% ( 31 of 37)
1st Serve Won
80% ( 32 of 40)
71% ( 10 of 14)
2nd Serve Won
32% ( 9 of 28)
40% ( 2 of 5)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
20% ( 10 of 51)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 27 of 68)
68
Total Points Won
51
W
6-4 6-4 H2H
Q2
L
6-7(4) 6-2 10-6 H2H
R1
cross
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Tanguy Genier
72% ( 38 of 53)
1st Serve %
56% ( 34 of 61)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
74% ( 28 of 38)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 23 of 34)
60% ( 9 of 15)
2nd Serve Won
30% ( 8 of 27)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
30% ( 16 of 53)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 30 of 61)
67
Total Points Won
47
L
6-3 6-2 H2H
QF
cross
Karl Poling
Player
Tanguy Genier
57% ( 29 of 51)
1st Serve %
49% ( 37 of 75)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
69% ( 20 of 29)
1st Serve Won
62% ( 23 of 37)
73% ( 16 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 16 of 38)
29% ( 4 of 14)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
29% ( 15 of 51)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 36 of 75)
72
Total Points Won
54
L
6-4 6-2 H2H

Tristan Berard Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
R2
cross
Kenny de Schepper
Player
Tristan Berard
83% ( 53 of 64)
1st Serve %
51% ( 30 of 59)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
70% ( 37 of 53)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 21 of 30)
64% ( 7 of 11)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 14 of 29)
60% ( 3 of 5)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
31% ( 20 of 64)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 24 of 59)
68
Total Points Won
55
L
7-5 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Tristan Berard
Player
Louis Wessels
61% ( 48 of 79)
1st Serve %
72% ( 50 of 69)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
79% ( 38 of 48)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 34 of 50)
58% ( 18 of 31)
2nd Serve Won
53% ( 10 of 19)
50% ( 2 of 4)
Break Points Won
14% ( 1 of 7)
29% ( 23 of 79)
Rtn Points Won
36% ( 25 of 69)
81
Total Points Won
67
W
7-6(4) 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
Tristan Berard
Player
Matteo Rocci
52% ( 22 of 42)
1st Serve %
55% ( 28 of 51)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
91% ( 20 of 22)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 18 of 28)
60% ( 12 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
26% ( 6 of 23)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
24% ( 10 of 42)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 27 of 51)
59
Total Points Won
34
W
6-3 6-1 H2H
Q1
cross
Tristan Berard
Player
Loic Namigandet Tenguere
57% ( 31 of 54)
1st Serve %
53% ( 39 of 74)
5
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
7
81% ( 25 of 31)
1st Serve Won
62% ( 24 of 39)
70% ( 16 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
51% ( 18 of 35)
33% ( 4 of 12)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
24% ( 13 of 54)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 32 of 74)
73
Total Points Won
55
W
7-6(9) 6-1 H2H
Q1
cross
Tanguy Genier
Player
Tristan Berard
73% ( 37 of 51)
1st Serve %
59% ( 40 of 68)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
84% ( 31 of 37)
1st Serve Won
80% ( 32 of 40)
71% ( 10 of 14)
2nd Serve Won
32% ( 9 of 28)
40% ( 2 of 5)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
20% ( 10 of 51)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 27 of 68)
68
Total Points Won
51
L
6-4 6-4 H2H
Q2
L
6-1 6-1 H2H
Q1
W
6-0 6-0 H2H
Q2
W
6-3 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Roland Stuurman
Player
Tristan Berard
68% ( 39 of 57)
1st Serve %
65% ( 30 of 46)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
74% ( 29 of 39)
1st Serve Won
47% ( 14 of 30)
33% ( 6 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 6 of 16)
71% ( 5 of 7)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
39% ( 22 of 57)
Rtn Points Won
57% ( 26 of 46)
61
Total Points Won
42
L
6-2 6-2 H2H
Q1
W
6-4 7-6(5) H2H
banner

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

47% (48/54)
Win/Loss
46% (11/13)
48% (112/121)
Sets Win/Loss
46% (23/27)
49% (1144/1170)
Games Win/Loss
49% (237/250)
49% (21/22)
Hard Win/Loss
60% (3/2)
44% (14/18)
Clay Win/Loss
0% (0/4)
48% (13/14)
Indoor Hard W/L
53% (8/7)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.25
Aces Per Game
0.21
283
Aces Total
50
0.13
Double Faults Per Game
0.15
149
Total Double Faults
36
1:12:22
Average Match Time
1:16:37
205.72
Average Opponent Rank
208.25
61% (3032/4997)
1st Serve %
63% (769/1217)
68% (2074/3032)
1st Serve Win %
67% (518/769)
51% (997/1965)
2nd Serve Win %
52% (233/448)
39% (179/464)
Break Points Won % (Total)
35% (37/106)
38% (1829/4856)
Return Points Win %
37% (452/1231)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
20% (1/4)
Challenger W/L
0% (0/0)
48% (47/50)
Futures W/L
46% (11/13)
47% (47/100)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
46% (11/24)
50% (1/2)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
53% (10/19)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
50% (5/10)
44% (12/27)
Deciding Set Win %
50% (1/2)
81% (48/39)
1st Set Won, Won Match
91% (11/10)
19% (48/9)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
9% (11/1)
17% (54/9)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
8% (13/1)

See recent tennis photos of Genier and Berard

Other Predictions

Zadar Challenger

flag
flag
Prediction

Zadar Challenger

flag
flag
Prediction
  • Loading news...