T. Genier
To Win
B. Fassbender
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L W W W L L WForm
L W W L W W L W L LThey have played 2 sets in total, with Genier winning 0 and Hoffmann winning 2. The last match between Genier and Hoffmann was at the M15 Lannion, 17-02-2025, Q3, I.hard with Moritz Hoffmann getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Tanguy Genier | 0 |
Moritz Hoffmann | 1 |
M15 Lannion(17-02-2025)
24 Mar 2025 / Q3
Miami Open - Miami wta
25 Mar 2025 / Fourth
Miami Open - Miami atp
24 Mar 2025 / Third
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Moritz Hoffmann
Player
Tanguy Genier
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Recent Second Serve Performance: In the past six months, Genier has displayed a second serve success rate of 47.27%, while Hoffmann has exhibited a superior performance, winning 51.13% of points. There exists a notable association between this statistical measure and the accuracy of match predictions.
Recent Return Game Statistics: Analyzing return statistics in their recent form, Genier has triumphed in 47.44% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Hoffmann has displayed an even better performance, winning 52.81% of these points. The percentages for first serve returns stand at 28.46% for Genier and 27.81% for Hoffmann, further supporting the contention that these numbers play a crucial role in determining the favorite in their head-to-head matchup.
Under Pressure Analysis: Delving into the realm of pressure situations, Genier has managed to save an impressive 69.29% of breakpoints in their recent outings. In contrast, Hoffmann has mustered a slightly lower save rate of 61.86%. As a consequence, this statistic holds significant value when making in-game betting predictions.
Performance Overview: Over the course of the last year, Genier has emerged victorious in 47.83% of the matches they have played, boasting a win-loss record of 22-24. Conversely, Hoffmann has attained a higher triumph rate of 61.76%, with a win-loss record of 21-13. These figures collectively provide a comprehensive overview of the head-to-head prediction.
Noteworthy Playing Surfaces: Examining their respective career win percentages on different playing surfaces, it becomes apparent that Genier thrives on indoor hard courts, securing victory in 50% of matches played (W/L 7/7). However, their performance weakens on clay courts, with a win percentage of 44% (W/L 14/18). On the other hand, Hoffmann's optimal playing surface proves to be hard courts, where they have prevailed in 73% of matches (W/L 8/3). Conversely, their success rate shores up to only 36% on clay courts (W/L 5/9).
Player Level: In the past year, Genier has predominantly competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a prize money of $10,000, achieving a respectable 51.22% win rate (W/L 21/20). Hoffmann, on the other hand, has engaged in a larger proportion of matches within the same tournament bracket, capturing victory in 61.76% of encounters (W/L 21/13). Consequently, when considering these statistics to predict the favorite, one must account for the relative level of the tournaments each player has been participating in.
Opponent Quality Statistics: Over the previous twelve months, Genier has faced adversaries with an average ranking of 251.09, while Hoffmann has been pitted against opponents boasting an average ranking of 119.65.
Deciding Set Performance vs All Players: For those interested in live predictions and betting, it is worth noting that in matches extending to a decisive set, Genier has emerged triumphant in 38% of such encounters over the past year. In contrast, Hoffmann has displayed a stronger showing, securing victory in 50% of all matches played on the tour.
Current Event Head-to-Head Stats: Past player performance serves as a crucial factor in predicting tennis matches. However, once an event is underway, it becomes imperative to consider the current event statistics in order to gauge the form and competence of the players. Consequently, a thorough review of the section below (if available), featuring information on their performances in the present event, should be undertaken. Additionally, it is essential to acknowledge that certain players excel specifically in particular events, and such considerations should be factored in when determining the ultimate outcome.
Break Point Conversion: In recent competitions, Genier has impressively converted 42.42% of their opportunities to break their opponent's serve. Hoffmann, displaying their own prowess, has achieved a conversion rate of 45.16% when presented with break point chances. This particular statistic bears significant importance for in-game live betting strategies whenever either player finds themselves at a breakpoint.
If you possess an interest in models dedicated to the prediction of tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point (Warning: Exclusive content for stats enthusiasts).
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Tanguy Genier
Player
Unknown Player
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Clement Kubiak
Player
Tanguy Genier
45%
(
19 of
42)
1st Serve %
70%
(
31 of
44)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
95%
(
18 of
19)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
26 of
31)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
8 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
20%
(
9 of
44)
43
Total Points Won
43
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Alessandro Pecci
Player
Tanguy Genier
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
7
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
20 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Tanguy Genier
Player
Michele Ribecai
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Tanguy Genier
Player
Tymur Bieldiugin
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
50
Total Points Won
47
|
4-6 6-3 10-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Tanguy Genier
Player
Ilan Hediger
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
90%
(
36 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-7(4) 6-3 10-6 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Moritz Hoffmann
Player
Tanguy Genier
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Tanguy Genier
Player
Tristan Berard
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
32 of
40)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-7(4) 6-2 10-6 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Tanguy Genier
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Sacha Grandvincent
Player
Moritz Hoffmann
69%
(
74 of
108)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
96)
8
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
1
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
32%
(
11 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
43 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
33 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(8) 7-6(4) 13-11 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF | 7-6(7) 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Moritz Hoffmann
Player
Carles Rojas
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Mathias Bourgue
Player
Moritz Hoffmann
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
14
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
27 of
32)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
22 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Moritz Hoffmann
Player
Tanguy Genier
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Moritz Hoffmann
Player
Ismael Soussi
51%
(
36 of
71)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Nikola Slavic
Player
Moritz Hoffmann
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
10
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
70)
66
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(3) 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H |
view more