Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tamara Zidansek vs Zeel Desai Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zidansek vs Desai analysis and find out who is favored!
Tamara Zidansek vs Zeel Desai Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zidansek has won 38.08% of points on his second serve, while Desai has won 42.47%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zidansek, in recent form, has won 52.13% of his opponent's second serve points, while Desai has won 55.78%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.56% and 40.18% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zidansek has saved 58.22% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Desai has saved 45.41% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zidansek has won 54.9% of matches played (W/L 28/ 23), with Desai winning 55.56% (W/L 30/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zidansek has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 74% (W/L 224/ 80), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 39% (W/L 7/ 11). Desai has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 29/ 14), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Zidansek has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.33% of matches (W/L 19/ 11), where as Desai has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 43.75% of matches (W/L 14/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zidansek winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Zidansek winning 2 and Desai winning 0. The last match between Zidansek and Desai was at the Solapur, 04-12-2018, First, Hard with Tamara Zidansek getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:20:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zidansek and Desai have played a deciding set 0 times, with Zidansek winning 0 times and Desai 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Zidansek winning 0, and Desai 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zidansek has played against opponents with an average rank of 207.57 while Desai has played against players with an average rank of 252.2.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zidansek has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Desai has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zidansek has converted 39.09% of breakpoint opportunities, and Desai has converted 50.5% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zidansek 1 - 0 Desai
133
Rank
22
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
584
Rank
511
High
25
Age
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
65% (331-180)
Career Total W/L
58% (174-127)
20% (2-8)
YTD W/L
35% (6-11)
$1,694,181
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Tamara Zidansek | Zeel Desai |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:20:0 | 1:20:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 50% (29/58) | 62% (43/69) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (20/29) | 44% (19/43) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 59% (17/29) | 46% (12/26) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 25% (1/4) |
| Return Points W% | 55% (38/69) | 36% (21/58) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Zeel Desai
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tamara Zidansek | Zeel Desai |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 20% (2/8) | 35% (6/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 26% (6/17) | 38% (13/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 40% (86/127) | 46% (138/161) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/4) | 38% (6/10) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.06 | 0.09 |
| Aces Total | 6 | 13 |
| DFs per game | 0.33 | 0.55 |
| DFs Total | 34 | 80 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:56:9 | 1:27:22 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 128.2 | 265.76 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (472/751) | 62% (586/940) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (283/472) | 56% (329/586) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 39% (108/279) | 41% (146/354) |
| BPs Won% Total | 35% (28/79) | 52% (63/122) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (288/724) | 46% (461/999) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 40% (2/3) | 36% (5/9) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 20% (2/10) | 38% (6/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 86% (7/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 14% (7/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 0% (10/0) |
Tamara Zidansek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Hailey Baptiste
Player
Tamara Zidansek
50%
(
54 of
108)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
5
Aces
0
13
Double Faults
7
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
39%
(
42 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
97
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elisabetta Cocciaretto
Player
Tamara Zidansek
77%
(
77 of
100)
1st Serve %
71%
(
66 of
93)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
44 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
93)
99
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Jule Niemeier
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Clara Tauson
Player
Tamara Zidansek
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
5
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristina Mladenovic
Player
Tamara Zidansek
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
64%
(
60 of
94)
6
Aces
0
14
Double Faults
4
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
94)
100
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(2) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Tamara Zidansek
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Nefisa Berberovic
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
74%
(
63 of
85)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
63)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
85)
83
Total Points Won
84
|
1-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katie Volynets
Player
Tamara Zidansek
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
21 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
45 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Tamara Zidansek
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Schmiedlova
Player
Tamara Zidansek
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve %
49%
(
31 of
63)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Zeel Desai Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Arabella Koller
Player
Zeel Desai
89%
(
56 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
6
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sahaja Yamalapalli
Player
Zeel Desai
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
9
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
46%
(
30 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Akiko Omae
Player
Zeel Desai
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ankita Raina
Player
Zeel Desai
72%
(
56 of
78)
1st Serve %
51%
(
42 of
82)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
7
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zeel Desai
Player
Vaidehi Chaudhari
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Wushuang Zheng
Player
Zeel Desai
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zeel Desai
Player
Tyra Lithiby
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
46%
(
28 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lanlana Tararudee
Player
Zeel Desai
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
7%
(
1 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Himeno Sakatsume
Player
Zeel Desai
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
20 of
34)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
25%
(
7 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
49%
(
30 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
52
Total Points Won
43
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zeel Desai
Player
Sapfo Sakellaridi
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve %
40%
(
20 of
50)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Zidansek Vs Desai Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
