M. Landaluce
To Win
T. Atmane
To Win
Tallon Griekspoor vs Terence Atmane Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W L W W W L
Form
W L W W L L L L W WHead To Head: Griekspoor 1 - 0 Atmane
They have played 3 sets in total, with Griekspoor winning 2 and Atmane winning 1. The last match between Griekspoor and Atmane was at the Bordeaux Challenger, 16-05-2025, Round: Quarterfinals, Surface: Clay, with Tallon Griekspoor getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-7(11) 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tallon Griekspoor | 1 |
| Terence Atmane | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Bordeaux Challenger(16-05-2025)
Tallon Griekspoor
Terence Atmane
7
6
6
7
7
5
| Griekspoor | Stats | Atmane |
|---|---|---|
| 64% (23-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 56% (23-18) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 35 | Ranking | 123 |
| 21 | Highest Rank | 118 |
| 28 | Age | 23 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 20 | Titles | 9 |
| 62% (418-251) | Career Total W/L | 62% (227-142) |
| $4,055,955 | Career Prize Money | $363,910 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
19 Jun 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sonego VS Zverev PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
19 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sinner VS Bublik PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
18 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Griekspoor VS Atmane H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 6-7(11) 7-5 |
Stats 
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Terence Atmane
65%
(
73 of
112)
1st Serve %
61%
(
93 of
153)
9
Aces
16
0
Double Faults
5
84%
(
61 of
73)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
70 of
93)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
28 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
55 of
153)
139
Total Points Won
126
|
||||
Griekspoor VS Atmane H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 20 | Games Won | 18 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 16 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 2:53:52 | Average Match Time | 2:53:52 |
| 65% (73/112) | 1st Serve % | 61% (93/153) |
| 84% (61/73) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (70/93) |
| 59% (23/39) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (28/60) |
| 14% (2/14) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 36% (55/153) | Return Points Win % | 25% (28/112) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Griekspoor vs Atmane Match Preview :
- Griekspoor shows stronger performance on second serves, winning 50.05% of the points compared to Atmane's 46.62%. Could this give Griekspoor an advantage in holding service games?
- Atmane excels against opponents' second serves, winning 45.01% of points compared to Griekspoor's 42.14%. How might this ability to break serve impact the match's outcome?
- In return games, Atmane leads in both second serve (45.01%) and first serve return points (24.03%), potentially offering an edge in breaking Griekspoor's serve.
- Under pressure, Atmane has saved 62.08% of breakpoints, outperforming Griekspoor's 59.2%. Does this suggest Atmane's higher resilience in critical moments?
- Both players have similar annual win rates, with Atmane slightly ahead (56.76%) compared to Griekspoor's (56.52%).
- Griekspoor excels on Grass with a 65% win rate, whereas Atmane's strength lies on Hard courts with a 65% win rate.
- Comparing competition levels, Griekspoor faced stronger opponents with an average rank of 69.29, while Atmane's opponents averaged a rank of 232.09. Will Griekspoor's experience against higher-ranked players influence the match?
- If faced with a deciding set, Griekspoor has a slightly better track record, winning 52% of such sets against Atmane's 47%.
- Atmane is the more efficient breakpoint converter, with a 32.73% success rate compared to Griekspoor's 22.7%. Could this conversion rate tip the match in Atmane's favor during crucial games?
Editorial Prediction (May 16, 2025, UTC):
This upcoming match features two athletes with remarkably close win rates over the past year, although they have competed at different levels. Griekspoor's experience on the Main tour with a win rate of 61.76% suggests a higher caliber of competition compared to Atmane's success at the Challenger and ITF levels.
Griekspoor's performance in deciding sets, alongside his marginally superior competition experience, might be crucial. However, Atmane's ability to convert breakpoints and effectiveness in return games could significantly disrupt Griekspoor's rhythm.
While Griekspoor's second-serve efficiency is commendable, Atmane's proficiency in breaking serves provides an intriguing counter. The deciding factor may well be Griekspoor's experience against highly-ranked players and his ability to handle pressure in crucial moments.
Considering the overall strengths and weaknesses, Griekspoor's experience and performance under pressure make him the slightly favored probable winner in this closely contested matchup.
Griekspoor vs Atmane Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Tallon Griekspoor Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R4 |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Tallon Griekspoor
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve %
79%
(
30 of
38)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
10 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
44
Total Points Won
28
|
6-4 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Ethan Quinn
72%
(
100 of
139)
1st Serve %
66%
(
101 of
153)
7
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
8
79%
(
79 of
100)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
66 of
101)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
29%
(
41 of
139)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
59 of
153)
157
Total Points Won
135
|
4-6 6-1 6-7(2) 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Gabriel Diallo
56%
(
74 of
133)
1st Serve %
63%
(
72 of
115)
12
Aces
12
6
Double Faults
6
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
50 of
72)
51%
(
30 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
39%
(
52 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
45 of
115)
126
Total Points Won
122
|
7-5 7-6(3) 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Marcos Giron
69%
(
75 of
108)
1st Serve %
59%
(
80 of
136)
8
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
63 of
75)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
56 of
80)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
24%
(
26 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
53 of
136)
135
Total Points Won
109
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Tallon Griekspoor
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Terence Atmane
65%
(
73 of
112)
1st Serve %
61%
(
93 of
153)
9
Aces
16
0
Double Faults
5
84%
(
61 of
73)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
70 of
93)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
28 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
55 of
153)
139
Total Points Won
126
|
7-6(3) 6-7(11) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Billy Harris
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
11
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Fils
Player
Tallon Griekspoor
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Terence Atmane Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Arthur Fery
64%
(
67 of
105)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
90)
8
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
31%
(
33 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
90)
101
Total Points Won
94
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Matteo Gigante
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
14
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
24 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
98)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Johannus Monday
Player
Terence Atmane
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
7
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
7
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
19 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Terence Atmane
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
72%
(
58 of
81)
3
Aces
20
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
81)
79
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Terence Atmane
59%
(
56 of
95)
1st Serve %
54%
(
61 of
114)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
10
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
56 of
114)
114
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Terence Atmane
65%
(
73 of
112)
1st Serve %
61%
(
93 of
153)
9
Aces
16
0
Double Faults
5
84%
(
61 of
73)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
70 of
93)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
28 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
55 of
153)
139
Total Points Won
126
|
7-6(3) 6-7(11) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Hugo Gaston
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
71%
(
52 of
73)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
79
Total Points Won
77
|
1-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
73%
(
56 of
77)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
28%
(
22 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
28 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (418/251) | Win/Loss | 62% (227/142) |
| 59% (957/666) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (515/356) |
| 53% (8333/7488) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (4506/4018) |
| 65% (147/78) | Hard Win/Loss | 65% (177/94) |
| 64% (180/103) | Clay Win/Loss | 56% (37/29) |
| 54% (69/58) | Indoor Hard W/L | 41% (9/13) |
| 65% (22/12) | Grass Win/Loss | 40% (4/6) |
| 0.45 | Aces Per Game | 0.51 |
| 3508 | Aces Total | 2113 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
| 1694 | Total Double Faults | 1235 |
| 1:30:1 | Average Match Time | 1:40:56 |
| 397.76 | Average Opponent Rank | 375.92 |
| 64% (27865/43864) | 1st Serve % | 59% (15587/26201) |
| 72% (20170/27865) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (11231/15587) |
| 51% (8243/16014) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (5554/10614) |
| 40% (1589/3927) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (963/2242) |
| 37% (16397/43839) | Return Points Win % | 38% (9772/25715) |
| 52% (28/26) | Slam W/L | 43% (6/8) |
| 44% (20/25) | Masters W/L | 57% (12/9) |
| 50% (11/11) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 58% (80/57) | Main Tour W/L | 44% (11/14) |
| 67% (118/58) | Challenger W/L | 63% (92/55) |
| 69% (160/73) | Futures W/L | 65% (106/56) |
| 63% (391/619) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (223/360) |
| 50% (18/36) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 57% (166/291) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (87/149) |
| 57% (141/247) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (72/134) |
| 84% (407/343) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (232/199) |
| 15% (407/63) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (232/33) |
| 29% (262/75) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (136/28) |
Griekspoor vs. Atmane Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
