Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tallon Griekspoor vs Pablo Carreno-Busta Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Griekspoor vs Carreno-Busta analysis and find out who is favored!
Tallon Griekspoor vs Pablo Carreno-Busta Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Griekspoor has won 53.5% of points on his second serve, while Carreno-Busta has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Griekspoor, in recent form, has won 45.53% of his opponent's second serve points, while Carreno-Busta has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 24.04% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Griekspoor has saved 65.09% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Carreno-Busta has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Griekspoor has won 57.89% of matches played (W/L 33/ 24), with Carreno-Busta winning 33.33% (W/L 1/ 2) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Griekspoor has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 18/ 9), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 56% (W/L 60/ 47). Carreno-Busta has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 339/ 168), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 32% (W/L 6/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Griekspoor has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 67.74% of matches (W/L 21/ 10), where as Carreno-Busta has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 1/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Griekspoor winning 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Griekspoor winning 2 and Carreno-Busta winning 3. The last match between Griekspoor and Carreno-Busta was at the Australian Open - Melbourne, 19-01-2022, Second, Hard with Pablo Carreno-Busta getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 4:10:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Griekspoor and Carreno-Busta have played a deciding set 1 times, with Griekspoor winning 0 times and Carreno-Busta 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Griekspoor winning 1, and Carreno-Busta 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Griekspoor has played against opponents with an average rank of 113.32 while Carreno-Busta has played against players with an average rank of 332.67.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Griekspoor has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Carreno-Busta has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Griekspoor has converted 37.5% of breakpoint opportunities, and Carreno-Busta has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Griekspoor 0 - 1 Carreno-Busta
25
Rank
21
High
27
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
605
Rank
10
High
32
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
63% (373-216)
Career Total W/L
64% (560-315)
55% (11-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,430,250
Career Prize Money
$9,946,935
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Griekspoor VS Carreno-Busta H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Tallon Griekspoor | Pablo Carreno-Busta |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 3 |
| Games Won | 26 | 28 |
| Aces (Total) | 10 | 10 |
| DFs (Total) | 14 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 4:10:0 | 4:10:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (100/187) | 68% (110/162) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (70/100) | 71% (78/110) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (41/87) | 46% (24/52) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 46% (6/13) | 41% (7/17) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (60/162) | 41% (76/187) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Griekspoor VS Carreno-Busta H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-7(6) 7-6(3) 3-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Pablo Carreno-Busta
Player
Tallon Griekspoor
68%
(
110 of
162)
1st Serve %
53%
(
100 of
187)
10
Aces
10
9
Double Faults
14
71%
(
78 of
110)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
70 of
100)
46%
(
24 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
41 of
87)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
37%
(
60 of
162)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
76 of
187)
178
Total Points Won
171
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tallon Griekspoor | Pablo Carreno-Busta |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 55% (11/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (26/26) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (264/284) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 83% (5/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.72 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 193 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 61 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 126.65 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (1108/1717) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (812/1108) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 54% (326/609) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (34/83) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 31% (506/1614) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 44% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (9/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (12/18) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 71% (5/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 78% (9/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 22% (9/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 36% (11/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Tallon Griekspoor Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Tallon Griekspoor
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Tallon Griekspoor
51%
(
36 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
68 of
103)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
44 of
68)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
103)
88
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Dominik Koepfer
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
52%
(
50 of
96)
7
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
37%
(
36 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
96)
106
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(2) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Tallon Griekspoor
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
71%
(
80 of
112)
15
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
0
90%
(
46 of
51)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
53 of
80)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
17%
(
13 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
44 of
112)
106
Total Points Won
81
|
5-7 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Alex Michelsen
64%
(
65 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
71 of
103)
25
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
82%
(
53 of
65)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
49 of
71)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
31%
(
32 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
103)
108
Total Points Won
97
|
7-6(5) 6-7(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Tallon Griekspoor
76%
(
51 of
67)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
8
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
6
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexander Bublik
Player
Tallon Griekspoor
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
22
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
24 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
26 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(8) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Abedallah Shelbayh
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
51
Total Points Won
39
|
7-5 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Tallon Griekspoor
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
18 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Pablo Carreno-Busta Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Mattia Bellucci
Player
Pablo Carreno-Busta
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
75%
(
47 of
63)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
18 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
63)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pablo Carreno-Busta
Player
Arthur Cazaux
70%
(
74 of
105)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
2
Aces
12
5
Double Faults
1
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
34 of
44)
32%
(
10 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
43%
(
45 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
27 of
73)
87
Total Points Won
91
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Pablo Carreno-Busta
69%
(
64 of
93)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
13)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
61)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Pablo Carreno-Busta
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
62 of
100)
13
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
100)
92
Total Points Won
92
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Pablo Carreno-Busta
66%
(
117 of
176)
1st Serve %
65%
(
122 of
187)
15
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
89 of
117)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
87 of
122)
56%
(
33 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
19%
(
4 of
21)
Break Points Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
31%
(
54 of
176)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
66 of
187)
188
Total Points Won
175
|
4-6 4-6 7-6(5) 6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pablo Carreno-Busta
Player
Pedro Cachin
63%
(
59 of
93)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
97)
15
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
1
90%
(
53 of
59)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
48 of
59)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
18 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
31 of
97)
106
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(4) 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Soon-Woo Kwon
Player
Pablo Carreno-Busta
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
107)
11
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
6
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
44 of
65)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
28 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
41 of
107)
101
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 5-7 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| R3 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Pablo Carreno-Busta
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
81%
(
52 of
64)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
0
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pablo Carreno-Busta
Player
Denis Shapovalov
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
50%
(
51 of
103)
3
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
9
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
44 of
51)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
27%
(
22 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
34 of
103)
93
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(2) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Griekspoor Vs Carreno-Busta Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
