Tallon Griekspoor vs Learner Tien Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L W L W W L
Form
L L W W L L L W L LHead-2-Head: Griekspoor 1 - 0 Tien
They have played 2 sets in total, with Griekspoor winning 2 and Tien winning 0. The last match between Griekspoor and Tien was at the BMW Open - Munich, 14-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Tallon Griekspoor getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tallon Griekspoor | 1 |
| Learner Tien | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: BMW Open - Munich(14-04-2025)
Tallon Griekspoor
Learner Tien
6
4
6
2
| Griekspoor | Stats | Tien |
|---|---|---|
| 63% (20-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 54% (14-12) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 34 | Ranking | 67 |
| 21 | Highest Rank | 66 |
| 28 | Age | 19 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 20 | Titles | 10 |
| 62% (415-250) | Career Total W/L | 72% (119-47) |
| $3,790,955 | Career Prize Money | $482,330 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Khachanov VS Ofner PREDICTION Clay
Gonet Geneva Open - Geneva atp
22 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Basilashvili VS Vacherot PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris atp
21 May 2025 / Q2 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Griekspoor VS Tien H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Learner Tien
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
Griekspoor VS Tien H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:11:21 | Average Match Time | 1:11:21 |
| 71% (37/52) | 1st Serve % | 62% (39/63) |
| 78% (29/37) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (24/39) |
| 60% (9/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (13/24) |
| 43% (3/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/4) |
| 41% (26/63) | Return Points Win % | 27% (14/52) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tallon Griekspoor Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Tallon Griekspoor
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Terence Atmane
65%
(
73 of
112)
1st Serve %
61%
(
93 of
153)
9
Aces
16
0
Double Faults
5
84%
(
61 of
73)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
70 of
93)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
28 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
55 of
153)
139
Total Points Won
126
|
7-6(3) 6-7(11) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Billy Harris
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
11
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Fils
Player
Tallon Griekspoor
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
16
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
86
Total Points Won
58
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Tallon Griekspoor
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve %
76%
(
38 of
50)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
17 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Vit Kopriva
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
91%
(
32 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Tallon Griekspoor
68%
(
79 of
116)
1st Serve %
61%
(
74 of
121)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
58 of
79)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
52 of
74)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
36 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
44 of
121)
124
Total Points Won
113
|
6-7(6) 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Learner Tien Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Kei Nishikori
Player
Learner Tien
60%
(
59 of
98)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
96)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
35%
(
34 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
96)
103
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Learner Tien
46%
(
25 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Reilly Opelka
49%
(
36 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
0
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
4
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-6(11) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Learner Tien
54%
(
51 of
95)
1st Serve %
54%
(
59 of
109)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
109)
104
Total Points Won
100
|
5-7 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcos Giron
Player
Learner Tien
59%
(
61 of
104)
1st Serve %
49%
(
47 of
96)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
41 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
96)
99
Total Points Won
101
|
6-1 1-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Learner Tien
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Henri Squire
54%
(
40 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
7
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (415/250) | Win/Loss | 72% (119/47) |
| 59% (948/660) | Sets Win/Loss | 65% (263/144) |
| 53% (8257/7422) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (2114/1717) |
| 65% (147/78) | Hard Win/Loss | 76% (92/29) |
| 63% (177/102) | Clay Win/Loss | 38% (6/10) |
| 54% (69/58) | Indoor Hard W/L | 72% (21/8) |
| 65% (22/12) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.45 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
| 3481 | Aces Total | 484 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 1682 | Total Double Faults | 485 |
| 1:29:40 | Average Match Time | 1:42:9 |
| 394.95 | Average Opponent Rank | 327.09 |
| 63% (27586/43446) | 1st Serve % | 63% (7536/12043) |
| 72% (19963/27586) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (5075/7536) |
| 51% (8171/15875) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (2327/4507) |
| 40% (1572/3882) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (610/1302) |
| 37% (16230/43401) | Return Points Win % | 42% (5065/11971) |
| 50% (25/25) | Slam W/L | 60% (6/4) |
| 44% (20/25) | Masters W/L | 14% (1/6) |
| 50% (11/11) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 58% (80/57) | Main Tour W/L | 63% (15/9) |
| 67% (118/58) | Challenger W/L | 75% (39/13) |
| 69% (160/73) | Futures W/L | 79% (58/15) |
| 63% (391/618) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 73% (111/152) |
| 45% (15/33) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (6/12) |
| 57% (165/289) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 62% (40/65) |
| 57% (140/246) | Deciding Set Win % | 71% (39/55) |
| 84% (406/342) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (105/98) |
| 16% (406/63) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (105/7) |
| 28% (259/73) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 34% (61/21) |
Griekspoor vs. Tien Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
