Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tallon Griekspoor vs Cem Ilkel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Griekspoor vs Ilkel analysis and find out who is favored!
Tallon Griekspoor vs Cem Ilkel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Griekspoor has won 53.61% of points on his second serve, while Ilkel has won 47.73%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Griekspoor, in recent form, has won 45.36% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ilkel has won 51.9%. The same stats for first serve returns are 24.32% and 25% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Griekspoor has saved 66.86% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ilkel has saved 54.32% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Griekspoor has won 57.89% of matches played (W/L 33/ 24), with Ilkel winning 39.58% (W/L 19/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Griekspoor has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 18/ 9), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 56% (W/L 60/ 47). Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 254/ 162), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Griekspoor has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 67.74% of matches (W/L 21/ 10), where as Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 37.5% of matches (W/L 12/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Griekspoor winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Griekspoor winning 2 and Ilkel winning 2. The last match between Griekspoor and Ilkel was at the U.S. Open - New York, 22-08-2019, Q2 round, Hard with Tallon Griekspoor getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:8:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Griekspoor and Ilkel have played a deciding set 0 times, with Griekspoor winning 0 times and Ilkel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Griekspoor winning 0, and Ilkel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Griekspoor has played against opponents with an average rank of 113.68 while Ilkel has played against players with an average rank of 237.9.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Griekspoor has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ilkel has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Griekspoor has converted 39.37% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ilkel has converted 45.05% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Griekspoor 1 - 1 Ilkel
25
Rank
21
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
415
Rank
144
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
63% (373-215)
Career Total W/L
56% (400-309)
58% (11-8)
YTD W/L
44% (8-10)
$2,430,250
Career Prize Money
$225,530
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Griekspoor VS Ilkel H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Tallon Griekspoor | Cem Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 17 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 11 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:8:30 | 1:8:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (57/102) | 61% (60/99) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 72% (41/57) | 65% (39/60) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (25/45) | 51% (20/39) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 40% (4/10) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (40/99) | 35% (36/102) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Griekspoor VS Ilkel H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats 
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Cem Ilkel
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
| 6-4 1-0 ret. |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Tallon Griekspoor
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
14 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
44
Total Points Won
36
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tallon Griekspoor | Cem Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (11/8) | 44% (8/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (26/24) | 43% (17/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (258/271) | 46% (165/195) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) | 43% (3/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 83% (5/1) | 45% (5/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.74 | 0.54 |
| Aces Total | 192 | 94 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 59 | 42 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:1:51 | 1:28:14 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 131.21 | 162.39 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (1068/1652) | 57% (616/1073) |
| 1st Serve W% | 74% (790/1068) | 72% (442/616) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 54% (313/584) | 46% (210/457) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (34/79) | 43% (32/74) |
| Return Pts W% | 31% (488/1554) | 36% (378/1044) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (7/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (9/16) | 41% (7/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (12/18) | 80% (4/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 71% (5/7) | 60% (3/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 78% (9/7) | 75% (8/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 22% (9/2) | 25% (8/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 40% (10/4) | 20% (10/2) |
Tallon Griekspoor Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Tallon Griekspoor
51%
(
36 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
68 of
103)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
44 of
68)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
103)
88
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Dominik Koepfer
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
52%
(
50 of
96)
7
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
37%
(
36 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
96)
106
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(2) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Tallon Griekspoor
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
71%
(
80 of
112)
15
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
0
90%
(
46 of
51)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
53 of
80)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
17%
(
13 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
44 of
112)
106
Total Points Won
81
|
5-7 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Alex Michelsen
64%
(
65 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
71 of
103)
25
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
82%
(
53 of
65)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
49 of
71)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
31%
(
32 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
103)
108
Total Points Won
97
|
7-6(5) 6-7(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Tallon Griekspoor
76%
(
51 of
67)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
8
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
6
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexander Bublik
Player
Tallon Griekspoor
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
22
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
24 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
26 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(8) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Abedallah Shelbayh
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
51
Total Points Won
39
|
7-5 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Tallon Griekspoor
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
18 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
13
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
1
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
42 of
54)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
20 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Petr Nesterov
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Yousef Khamis
47%
(
34 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
9
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
5
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Agwi
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
11
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Johan Nikles
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Illya Marchenko
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(6) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Kyle Edmund
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
12
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
13
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Cem Ilkel
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Griekspoor Vs Ilkel Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Tallon Griekspoor
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
