Prediction of Talia Gibson vs Jule Niemeier Head-to-Head, Best Odds & Picks At Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
64% (142-80)
Career Total W/L
58% (210-149)
25% (1-3)
YTD W/L
40% (2-3)
$277,440
Career Prize Money
$1,622,105
0
YTD Titles
0
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Talia Gibson vs Jule Niemeier Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gibson 0 - 0 Niemeier
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gibson has won 45.23% of points on their second serve, while Niemeier has won 42.96%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gibson, in recent form, has won 55.29% of their opponent's second serve points, while Niemeier has won 52.13%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.09% and 33.9% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gibson has saved 47.44% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Niemeier has saved 54.46% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gibson has won 63.89% of matches played (W/L 46/ 26), with Niemeier winning 53.97% (W/L 34/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gibson has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 126/ 63), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3). Niemeier has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 126/ 65), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 44% (W/L 36/ 45).
- Player level: In the last year, Gibson has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 67.8% of matches (W/L 40/ 19), where as Niemeier has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.5% of matches (W/L 15/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gibson has played against opponents with an average rank of 284.4 while Niemeier has played against players with an average rank of 154.4.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gibson has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Niemeier has won 45% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gibson has converted 45.71% of breakpoint opportunities, and Niemeier has converted 36.45% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Talia Gibson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Talia Gibson
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
56%
(
18 of
32)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
9 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
51
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Talia Gibson
Player
Zeynep Sonmez
60%
(
59 of
98)
1st Serve %
63%
(
69 of
110)
5
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
6
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
40 of
69)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
13 of
41)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
48%
(
47 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
57 of
110)
108
Total Points Won
100
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lucia Bronzetti
Player
Talia Gibson
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
77)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
82
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marie Bouzkova
Player
Talia Gibson
64%
(
68 of
106)
1st Serve %
66%
(
79 of
120)
9
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
1
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
48 of
79)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
41%
(
43 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
54 of
120)
117
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lizette Cabrera
Player
Talia Gibson
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Talia Gibson
Player
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Talia Gibson
Player
Haruna Arakawa
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vaidehi Chaudhari
Player
Talia Gibson
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Talia Gibson
Player
Cara Korhonen
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve %
69%
(
27 of
39)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
51
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emerson Jones
Player
Talia Gibson
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
2
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
4
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
46%
(
38 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
82
Total Points Won
76
|
2-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Jule Niemeier Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Marta Kostyuk
Player
Jule Niemeier
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Maja Chwalinska
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
21 of
35)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marie Bouzkova
Player
Jule Niemeier
71%
(
63 of
89)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
94)
3
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
7
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
49 of
94)
102
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Sorana Cirstea
41%
(
21 of
51)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
56
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Jule Niemeier
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Emma Raducanu
Player
Jule Niemeier
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
44%
(
34 of
77)
10
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
9
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucrezia Stefanini
Player
Jule Niemeier
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
9
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Jule Niemeier
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
37%
(
23 of
62)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
12
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Qinwen Zheng
Player
Jule Niemeier
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
44%
(
19 of
43)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Moyuka Uchijima
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
45%
(
25 of
56)
6
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Gibson vs Niemeier?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Gibson Vs Niemeier is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Talia Gibson | Jule Niemeier |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 25% (1/3) | 40% (2/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 30% (3/7) | 45% (5/6) |
| Games Win/Loss | 43% (40/54) | 48% (43/46) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 40% (2/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.33 | 0.33 |
| Aces Total | 15 | 14 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.49 |
| DFs Total | 10 | 21 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:59:25 | 1:32:57 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 56.25 | 79.8 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (205/327) | 54% (168/309) |
| 1st Serve W% | 57% (117/205) | 62% (104/168) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (54/122) | 44% (62/141) |
| BPs Won% Total | 36% (14/39) | 40% (16/40) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (141/335) | 43% (126/291) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) | 33% (1/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 25% (1/4) | 40% (2/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 67% (3/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (4/1) | 0% (2/0) |
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
