Tadeas Paroulek vs Luke Simkiss Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 04 Sep at 09:44 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Paroulek vs L. Simkiss

CZE
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Paroulek 1 - 0 Simkiss
They have played 3 sets in total, with Tadeas Paroulek winning 2 and Luke Simkiss winning 1. The last match between Tadeas Paroulek and Luke Simkiss was at the M15 Szczawno, 04-09-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Draw getting the victory 7-6(8) 4-6 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Paroulek | 1 |
| Simkiss | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Szczawno(09-04-25)
T. Paroulek vs L. Simkiss H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 63.10% (224-131) | Career Total W/L | 48.87% (65-68) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 2 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
T. Paroulek vs L. Simkiss Match Preview:
- When evaluating second serve effectiveness in the last six months, Simkiss shows a slight edge with 45.39% of points won, compared to Paroulek's 43.26%. Could this small advantage influence the match outcome? Possibly.
- In terms of returning second serves, Simkiss leads with 45.59% success over Paroulek's 43.02%, suggesting better defensive skills. Will this play a crucial role? It could give Simkiss an upper hand.
- Examining return performance on first serves, Simkiss achieves 33.07%, surpassing Paroulek's 28.94%. Might this boost Simkiss's chances? It seems likely.
- Under pressure, Paroulek boasts a significantly higher breakpoint saving rate at 56.31%, whereas Simkiss manages 39.53%, indicating Paroulek has a stronger ability to handle critical moments effectively.
- Paroulek's overall match win rate over the past year is 71.26%, considerably higher than Simkiss's 59.09%, reflecting more consistent success.
- On clay surfaces, Paroulek excels with a 65% win rate, whereas Simkiss finds grass more favorable, winning 67% of matches. Could surface play a deciding factor? Depending on the surface, this could be pivotal.
- Regarding playing level, Paroulek has participated extensively in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, winning 73.68% of matches, which exceeds Simkiss's 59.09%. Does experience count? It could sway the result in Paroulek's favor.
- Considering opponent quality, Paroulek typically faces higher-ranked opponents, with an average rank of 87.52, compared to Simkiss's 328, indicating Paroulek has been challenged more robustly.
- In final sets over the past 12 months, Simkiss has prevailed 63% of the time compared to Paroulek's 57%, pointing to greater resilience in crucial moments.
- Recent event stats are crucial for predictions, as they offer insights into current player forms at specific competitions.
- For break point conversions, Simkiss outperforms slightly by converting 37.93% of opportunities, while Paroulek converts 32.7%, impacting possible momentum shifts during the match.
Editorial Prediction (September 4, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming tennis match between Paroulek and Simkiss appears evenly matched, with both players demonstrating strengths in different areas. Simkiss shows a slight upper hand in second serve performance and return game efficiency, which are critical components in turning games around.
However, Paroulek's ability to handle pressure by saving break points more effectively could be crucial, alongside a stronger overall match winning percentage. Additionally, Paroulek's experience against higher-ranked opponents may provide a psychological edge.
While Simkiss's record in final-set situations suggests resilience, Paroulek's general performance consistency and higher levels of competition faced weigh heavily in their favor. Taking into account the complete set of statistics, Paroulek is marginally favored to win the match.
Tadeas Paroulek vs Luke Simkiss Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Paroulek vs L. Simkiss H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 17 | Games Won | 15 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 3:10:58 | Average Match Time | 3:10:58 |
| 54% (58/107) | 1st Serve % | 69% (69/100) |
| 76% (44/58) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (49/69) |
| 57% (28/49) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (17/31) |
| 40% (2/5) | Break Pts Won % | 40% (2/5) |
| 34% (34/100) | Return Points Win % | 33% (35/107) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. Paroulek Recent Matches Played
L. Simkiss Recent Matches Played

T. Paroulek vs L. Simkiss Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.10% (224/131) | YTD Win/Loss | 48.87% (65/68) |
| 60.88% (487/313) | Sets Win/Loss | 48.72% (152/160) |
| 54.26% (4010/3380) | Games Win/Loss | 49.85% (1509/1518) |
| 64.49% (69/38) | Hard Win/Loss | 52.94% (36/32) |
| 64.52% (140/77) | Clay Win/Loss | 48.57% (17/18) |
| 48.39% (15/16) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33.33% (8/16) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 66.67% (4/2) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
| 366 | Aces Total | 290 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 729 | Total Double Faults | 218 |
| 1:15:32 | Average Match Time | 1:3:9 |
| 449.4 | Average Opponent Rank | 320.74 |
| 62% (10160/16306) | 1st Serve % | 63% (3602/5673) |
| 65% (6576/10160) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (2389/3602) |
| 50% (3096/6146) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (1049/2071) |
| 44% (876/1981) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (157/391) |
| 43% (7371/17027) | Return Points Win % | 34% (1791/5237) |
| 52.38% (11/10) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 63.77% (213/121) | Futures W/L | 48.87% (65/68) |
| 63% (219/347) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (65/133) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (41/76) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 41% (17/41) |
| 56% (53/95) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (24/46) |
| 90% (213/191) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (64/51) |
| 10% (213/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (64/13) |
| 23% (141/33) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (69/14) |