Sydney Zick vs Pijus Vaitiekunas Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L L W W W L L
Form
W W L W W L W L W LHead-2-Head: Zick 2 - 0 Vaitiekunas
They have played 4 sets in total, with Zick winning 4 and Vaitiekunas winning 0. The last match between Zick and Vaitiekunas was at the M15 Klagenfurt, 01-06-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Clay, with Sydney Zick getting the victory 7-6(2) 7-6(3).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sydney Zick | 2 |
| Pijus Vaitiekunas | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M15 Klagenfurt(01-06-2025)
Sydney Zick
Pijus Vaitiekunas
7
6
7
6
| Zick | Stats | Vaitiekunas |
|---|---|---|
| 58% (23-17) | YTD Win/Loss | 65% (20-11) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | N/A |
| Highest Rank | N/A | |
| 18 | Age | 22 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 54% (30-26) | Career Total W/L | 56% (86-68) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Alexandrova VS Werner PREDICTION Clay
European Open - Hamburg wta
17 Jul 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Shevchenko VS Bublik PREDICTION Clay
EFG Swiss Open - Gstaad atp
17 Jul 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Zick VS Vaitiekunas H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(2) 7-6(3) | |||||
| 6-4 7-5 |
Stats 
Sydney Zick
Player
Pijus Vaitiekunas
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
Zick VS Vaitiekunas H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 27 | Games Won | 21 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 0:49:19 | Average Match Time | 0:49:19 |
| 52% (33/64) | 1st Serve % | 69% (44/64) |
| 73% (24/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (30/44) |
| 55% (17/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (8/20) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 67% (2/3) |
| 41% (26/64) | Return Points Win % | 36% (23/64) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Zick vs Vaitiekunas Match Preview :
What can the numbers tell us about this intriguing matchup on the courts? Delving into the labyrinth of statistics, let's explore the recent performances of Vaitiekunas and Zick, starting with their second serve prowess. Over the past six months, a slim margin separates them; Vaitiekunas has clinched 33.94% of points on their second serve, while Zick trails slightly with 30.61%. Perhaps this subtle edge plays a crucial role in shaping the outcome of their encounters.
Moving beyond serves to the return game, we see a notable distinction. Vaitiekunas has seized 38.18% of points against their opponents' second serves, yet Zick emerges dominant here, claiming an impressive 46.09%. Intriguingly, the dynamic flips on first serve returns where Vaitiekunas wins 33.33% of these points, compared to Zick's 27.14%. Can these stats hint at who might wield the advantage in the heat of the match?
When pressure mounts, who stands firmer on court? Analyzing their breakpoint resilience, Zick has saved 51.92% of breakpoints—outpacing Vaitiekunas, who stands at 46.15%. This capability can prove essential, especially for those keen on in-game betting insights.
How have they fared overall? Over the past year, Vaitiekunas has secured victory in 61.29% of his matches (19 wins to 12 losses), whereas Zick follows closely with a win rate of 57.69% (15 wins to 11 losses). Both primarily compete in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, making these stats directly comparable.
Surface affinity also sways predictions. Hard courts prove to be their forte, with Vaitiekunas winning 59% of his matches on this surface and Zick performing even better, winning 65%. However, less favorable surfaces see their performances dip, with Vaitiekunas struggling on indoor hard courts (0% win rate), and Zick on clay (25% win rate).
In terms of the caliber of opposition faced, Zick's opponents have been tougher on average, boasting a ranking of 134.27 against Vaitiekunas's 175.68. Heading into deciding sets, Zick again has the upper hand with a 67% success rate compared to Vaitiekunas's 50%, a potentially deciding factor in tight matches.
Finally, considering breakpoint opportunities, Zick exhibits better conversion at 43.75%, compared to Vaitiekunas's 30.43%. This statistic can sway the pendulum dramatically during crucial points, being especially relevant for those following live betting.
When synthesizing these insights, Zick appears equipped to claim victory, owing to stronger return stats, better handling under pressure, and a knack for succeeding in deciding moments. But as every tennis fan knows, matches are won on the court, not on paper. Nonetheless, if stats hold true, Zick is the player poised to emerge triumphant.
Zick vs Vaitiekunas Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Sydney Zick Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hannestad
Player
Sydney Zick
74%
(
61 of
82)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
0
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
38%
(
31 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
88
Total Points Won
68
|
4-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nick Hardt
Player
Sydney Zick
86%
(
71 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
0
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sydney Zick
Player
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
58%
(
59 of
102)
1st Serve %
63%
(
62 of
98)
3
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
6
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
40%
(
17 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
42 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
98)
104
Total Points Won
96
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sydney Zick
Player
Wilson Leite
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
9
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Lenn Luemkemann
Player
Sydney Zick
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
45%
(
35 of
77)
0
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
6
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
23 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Sydney Zick
75%
(
59 of
79)
1st Serve %
49%
(
41 of
84)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
33 of
41)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
24 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
30 of
84)
85
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Pijus Vaitiekunas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 7-6(2) 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
| Q2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 4-6 6-4 10-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Viktor Jovic
Player
Pijus Vaitiekunas
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
60
Total Points Won
55
|
3-6 6-3 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Pijus Vaitiekunas
Player
Makar Elesin
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54% (30/26) | Win/Loss | 56% (86/68) |
| 54% (69/58) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (188/156) |
| 52% (634/588) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (1710/1575) |
| 61% (14/9) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (65/45) |
| 50% (12/12) | Clay Win/Loss | 50% (21/21) |
| 44% (4/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 65 | Aces Total | 71 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 71 | Total Double Faults | 154 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 180.45 | Average Opponent Rank | 176.36 |
| 56% (823/1481) | 1st Serve % | 63% (2245/3556) |
| 67% (553/823) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (1384/2245) |
| 44% (292/658) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (597/1311) |
| 45% (70/157) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (145/353) |
| 41% (592/1450) | Return Points Win % | 40% (1404/3529) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 54% (30/26) | Futures W/L | 56% (86/67) |
| 54% (30/56) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (86/154) |
| 40% (4/10) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (7/21) |
| 40% (6/15) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (20/36) |
| 81% (32/26) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (87/76) |
| 19% (32/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (87/11) |
| 17% (24/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (67/10) |
Zick vs. Vaitiekunas Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
