Sven Corbinais vs Espen Lagarde Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L W L W W L L
Form
L L L L L W L L W LHead-To-Head: Corbinais 1 - 0 Lagarde
They have played 2 sets in total, with Corbinais winning 2 and Lagarde winning 0. The last match between Corbinais and Lagarde was at the M15 Lannion, 16-02-2025, Q1 round, I.hard with Sven Corbinais getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sven Corbinais | 1 |
| Espen Lagarde | 0 |
M15 Lannion(16-02-2025)
6
2
6
4
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Musetti VS Halys PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
21 Mar 2025 / Second
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Fokina VS Tiafoe PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
22 Mar 2025 / Second
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 | |||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
12
Games Won
6
0
Aces (Total)
0
0
Total Double Faults
0
0:0:0
Average Match Time
0:0:0
0% (0/0)
1st Serve %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Serve Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
2nd Serve Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Break Points Won % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Return Points Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Sven Corbinais vs Espen Lagarde Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sven Corbinais 1 - 0 Espen Lagarde
- Recent Performance Analysis: In the past six months, there has been a noticeable disparity in the second serve performance between Corbinais and Lagarde. Corbinais has exuded dominance by winning an impressive 43.01% of points on their second serve, whereas Lagarde has achieved a commendable 38.94% success rate. This statistic holds significant relevance as it showcases a noteworthy correlation with match prediction accuracy.
- Return Game Proficiency: Delving into their recent form, Corbinais exhibits immense prowess in return game statistics. They have astonishingly won 56.3% of their opponents' second serve points, illustrating a strong competitive edge. In contrast, Lagarde falls slightly behind with a respectable 45.61% triumph in the same category. When considering first serve returns, Corbinais maintains a 35.86% success rate, while Lagarde trails at 25.14%. These figures play a vital role in assessing the favorite in their upcoming head-to-head matchup, fostering a profound correlation.
- Analysis Under Pressure: When faced with challenging scenarios, it is crucial to analyze how players cope. In terms of breakpoints, Corbinais has successfully saved 50.49% in recent matches. Comparatively, Lagarde has proven his mettle by saving 51.35% of breakpoints. This statistic serves as a valuable tool for in-game betting predictions, allowing astute observers to make calculated judgments.
- Performance Overview: Examining their past year's performance, Corbinais has emerged victorious in 59.09% of matches played, boasting a commendable win/loss record of 26/18. On the other hand, Lagarde has achieved success in 32.26% of matches, with a win/loss record of 10/21. Taken holistically, these numbers provide an insightful overview of their head-to-head prediction.
- Surface Specialization: Unveiling their expertise on different playing surfaces, Corbinais thrives on hard courts with a 56% career win percentage (31/24 W/L), while their performance on clay courts diminishes to 30% (11/26 W/L). Similarly, Lagarde flourishes on hard courts, amassing a career win percentage of 43% (9/12 W/L), but struggles on clay courts with a mediocre 27% success rate (3/8 W/L).
- Player Level: Analyzing the level at which players have competed over the past year provides crucial insights for predicting favoritism. Corbinais has predominantly participated in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a $10K purse, achieving a commendable 59.09% success rate (26/18 W/L). Conversely, Lagarde has primarily competed in similar tournaments, attaining a 32.26% win percentage (10/21 W/L). When comparing players' statistics, it is imperative to consider the relative event level at which they have participated.
- Opponent Quality Assessment: Over the last 12 months, Corbinais has encountered opponents with an average rank of 138.7, while Lagarde has faced players with an average rank of 90.68. These statistics shed light on the level of competition both players have encountered and highlight the challenges they have overcome.
- Deciding Set Performance: In live predictions and betting scenarios, the performance of players in deciding sets becomes a crucial factor. Over the past year, Corbinais has demonstrated resilience by winning 40% of deciding sets, underscoring their ability to thrive under pressure. Meanwhile, Lagarde has achieved an impressive win rate of 50% in all matches played on tour with a determining set. This statistic further adds weight to the assessment of their upcoming match.
- Current Event Head-to-Head Stats: While past player performance holds valuable information for predicting tennis matches, current event statistics also play a pivotal role in forecasting outcomes. It is advisable to assess the performance of players in the current event, taking into consideration their form and potential advantages they may possess. A detailed overview of their current event stats can be found in the section below.
- Break Point Conversion: In recent encounters, Corbinais has displayed exceptional prowess in converting breakpoint opportunities, seizing 47.47% of them. Lagarde, while not reaching the same level of efficiency, has still managed to convert 26.67% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. These statistics serve as valuable indicators for in-game live betting tips, particularly when a player is presented with a crucial breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are intrigued by models that accurately predict tennis matches, exploring this article can be an excellent starting point. It provides insightful information; however, it caters specifically to stats enthusiasts.
Sven Corbinais Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
William Grant
Player
Sven Corbinais
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
75%
(
55 of
73)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
42 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(2) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-7(3) 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 4-6 7-6(3) 10-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Andrea Paolini
Player
Sven Corbinais
76%
(
54 of
71)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
14
46%
(
25 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
52%
(
37 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 7-5 10-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Peter Alam
Player
Sven Corbinais
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
32%
(
9 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
46%
(
29 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
66)
58
Total Points Won
71
|
2-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Ewen Lumsden
Player
Sven Corbinais
67%
(
58 of
86)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
95)
5
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
15
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
38 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
51 of
95)
99
Total Points Won
82
|
6-1 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Espen Lagarde Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 3-6 11-9 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ruslan Serazhetdinov
Player
Espen Lagarde
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
45% (53/65)
Win/Loss
35% (16/30)
47% (128/143)
Sets Win/Loss
36% (36/64)
48% (1249/1355)
Games Win/Loss
45% (420/509)
56% (34/27)
Hard Win/Loss
42% (11/15)
30% (11/26)
Clay Win/Loss
27% (3/8)
40% (8/12)
Indoor Hard W/L
22% (2/7)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.01
Aces Per Game
0.13
9
Aces Total
60
0.24
Double Faults Per Game
0.19
310
Total Double Faults
87
1st Match
Average Match Time
1st Match
191.57
Average Opponent Rank
85.28
63% (2103/3337)
1st Serve %
61% (630/1039)
57% (1193/2103)
1st Serve Win %
65% (408/630)
41% (508/1234)
2nd Serve Win %
44% (178/409)
43% (169/393)
Break Points Won % (Total)
35% (29/83)
43% (1412/3308)
Return Points Win %
35% (367/1039)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L
0% (0/0)
45% (53/65)
Futures W/L
35% (16/30)
45% (53/118)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
35% (16/46)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
63% (10/16)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
33% (2/6)
37% (13/35)
Deciding Set Win %
50% (4/8)
75% (56/42)
1st Set Won, Won Match
88% (16/14)
25% (56/14)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
13% (16/2)
18% (62/11)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
7% (30/2)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
