X. Gao
To Win
V. Erjavec
To Win
Suzan Lamens vs Veronika Erjavec Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L W L W L L
Form
L W W W L L L W L WH2H: Lamens 2 - 0 Erjavec
They have played 5 sets in total, with Lamens winning 4 and Erjavec winning 1. The last match between Lamens and Erjavec was at the Australian Open - Melbourne, 12-01-2025, First, Hard with Suzan Lamens getting the victory 7-5 7-6(2).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Suzan Lamens | 2 |
| Veronika Erjavec | 0 |
Australian Open - Melbourne(12-01-2025)
7
5
7
6
| Lamens | Stats | Erjavec |
|---|---|---|
| 53% (10-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 53% (8-7) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 70 | Ranking | 154 |
| 64 | Highest Rank | 152 |
| 25 | Age | 25 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 8 | Titles | 6 |
| 58% (295-216) | Career Total W/L | 63% (248-146) |
| $416,343 | Career Prize Money | $225,000 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fritz VS Berrettini PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
27 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Paolini PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
27 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 7-6(2) |
Stats 
Suzan Lamens
Player
Veronika Erjavec
57%
(
54 of
94)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
79)
3
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
2
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
94
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
| 6-4 3-6 6-1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Veronika Erjavec
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
44%
(
37 of
84)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 29 | Games Won | 22 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:56:0 | Average Match Time | 1:56:0 |
| 63% (104/165) | 1st Serve % | 52% (84/163) |
| 72% (75/104) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (49/84) |
| 52% (32/61) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (38/79) |
| 42% (8/19) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 36% (5/14) |
| 47% (76/163) | Return Points Win % | 35% (58/165) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Suzan Lamens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Suzan Lamens
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Rybakina
Player
Suzan Lamens
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Marie Bouzkova
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
54%
(
51 of
95)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
10
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Greetje Minnen
Player
Suzan Lamens
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
69%
(
27 of
39)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Kamilla Rakhimova
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
54%
(
55 of
102)
6
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
15 of
47)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
50 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
102)
101
Total Points Won
101
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karolina Muchova
Player
Suzan Lamens
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Shuai Zhang
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Daria Saville
58%
(
55 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
11
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
97
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anhelina Kalinina
Player
Suzan Lamens
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
0
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
30%
(
9 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
47%
(
39 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
83
Total Points Won
85
|
1-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Anna Bondar
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
93)
3
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
2
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
87
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(2) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Veronika Erjavec Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Jil Teichmann
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Veronika Erjavec
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
87%
(
41 of
47)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Diane Parry
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lola Radivojevic
Player
Veronika Erjavec
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Veronika Erjavec
65%
(
60 of
92)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
103)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
42%
(
39 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
103)
103
Total Points Won
92
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Veronika Erjavec
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
87)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Jana Kolodynska
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
0
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
28%
(
8 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
6 of
30)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
49%
(
33 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Kaja Juvan
44%
(
30 of
68)
1st Serve %
52%
(
35 of
67)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Anna Kmiecik
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
22 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matilde Paoletti
Player
Veronika Erjavec
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
52%
(
35 of
67)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (295/216) | Win/Loss | 63% (248/146) |
| 56% (654/515) | Sets Win/Loss | 62% (549/337) |
| 53% (5630/5002) | Games Win/Loss | 56% (4430/3521) |
| 54% (80/67) | Hard Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) |
| 60% (182/119) | Clay Win/Loss | 66% (212/108) |
| 57% (32/24) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (31/31) |
| 14% (1/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 832 | Aces Total | 322 |
| 0.47 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 2413 | Total Double Faults | 815 |
| 1:29:3 | Average Match Time | 1:26:59 |
| 430.99 | Average Opponent Rank | 398.59 |
| 59% (17917/30557) | 1st Serve % | 67% (15354/22977) |
| 62% (11070/17917) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (9113/15354) |
| 43% (5385/12641) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (3552/7622) |
| 51% (2070/4072) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (1669/3297) |
| 48% (14734/30656) | Return Points Win % | 49% (11489/23451) |
| 25% (3/9) | Slam W/L | 50% (5/5) |
| 44% (4/5) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 69% (9/4) | Cups W/L | 25% (1/3) |
| 52% (24/22) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 62% (166/101) | Challenger W/L | 63% (177/102) |
| 54% (89/75) | Futures W/L | 65% (65/35) |
| 58% (292/507) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (247/392) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 49% (47/95) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 43% (25/58) |
| 56% (83/149) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (45/98) |
| 90% (270/244) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (247/220) |
| 10% (270/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (247/27) |
| 21% (241/51) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (147/28) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Veronika Erjavec
View full predicted draw for Erjavec in Antalya
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
