Suzan Lamens vs Phillis Vanenburg Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lamens vs Vanenburg analysis and find out who is favored!
Suzan Lamens vs Phillis Vanenburg Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lamens has won 43.84% of points on his second serve, while Vanenburg has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lamens, in recent form, has won 56.35% of his opponent's second serve points, while Vanenburg has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.24% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lamens has saved 53.99% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vanenburg has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lamens has won 63.29% of matches played (W/L 50/ 29), with Vanenburg winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lamens has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 30/ 20), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Vanenburg has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 27/ 19), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Lamens has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 46/ 23), where as Vanenburg has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Lamens winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Lamens winning 2 and Vanenburg winning 3. The last match between Lamens and Vanenburg was at the Heraklion, 25-10-2016, First, Hard with Phillis Vanenburg getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:58:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lamens and Vanenburg have played a deciding set 1 times, with Lamens winning 1 times and Vanenburg 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Lamens winning 0, and Vanenburg 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lamens has played against opponents with an average rank of 251.96 while Vanenburg has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lamens has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vanenburg has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lamens has converted 50.44% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vanenburg has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lamens 1 - 1 Vanenburg
6
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
2
Minor
156
Rank
156
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard1
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
735
High
26
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
58% (252-186)
Career Total W/L
54% (31-26)
68% (13-6)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$38,553
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Suzan Lamens | Phillis Vanenburg |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
Sets Won | 2 | 3 |
Games Won | 19 | 27 |
Aces (Total) | 5 | 5 |
DFs (Total) | 10 | 16 |
Avg Match Time | 1:58:0 | 1:58:0 |
1st Serve % | 51% (78/153) | 54% (86/158) |
1st Serve Win% | 60% (47/78) | 57% (49/86) |
2nd Serve Win% | 33% (25/75) | 51% (37/72) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (9/18) | 62% (13/21) |
Return Points W% | 46% (72/158) | 53% (81/153) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-1 |
Phillis Vanenburg
Player
Suzan Lamens
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
45%
(
29 of
64)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
1-6 7-5 6-4 |
Suzan Lamens
Player
Phillis Vanenburg
55%
(
49 of
89)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
92)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
11
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
35%
(
14 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
53%
(
47 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
92)
90
Total Points Won
91
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Suzan Lamens | Phillis Vanenburg |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 68% (13/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 57% (27/20) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 54% (237/201) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 79% (11/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.23 | 0 |
Aces Total | 50 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.28 | 0 |
DFs Total | 61 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:52:4 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 240.74 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 61% (909/1489) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 63% (576/909) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 47% (274/580) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 49% (92/188) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 47% (684/1463) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 75% (12/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (12/18) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 14% (1/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 88% (7/8) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 91% (11/10) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 9% (11/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 38% (8/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Suzan Lamens Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Suzan Lamens
Player
Jessica Hinojosa Gomez
53%
(
37 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
6%
(
1 of
16)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
51%
(
36 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tereza Valentova
Player
Suzan Lamens
61%
(
65 of
106)
1st Serve %
64%
(
65 of
102)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
6
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
48 of
65)
37%
(
15 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
43 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
101
Total Points Won
107
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
F |
Suzan Lamens
Player
Celine Naef
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
Suzan Lamens
Player
Anastasia Tikhonova
67%
(
79 of
118)
1st Serve %
61%
(
64 of
105)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
40%
(
47 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
105)
115
Total Points Won
108
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Suzan Lamens
Player
Zeynep Sonmez
69%
(
59 of
85)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
86)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Suzan Lamens
Player
Lucie Havlickova
69%
(
75 of
109)
1st Serve %
52%
(
52 of
100)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
39%
(
43 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
100)
109
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(2) 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Suzan Lamens
Player
Moyuka Uchijima
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Suzan Lamens
Player
Valentina Ryser
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
46 of
88)
86
Total Points Won
71
|
6-1 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Suzan Lamens
Player
Julie Struplova
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
SF |
Noma Akugue Noha
Player
Suzan Lamens
70%
(
51 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Phillis Vanenburg Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Pei-Chi Lee
Player
Phillis Vanenburg
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
9
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Malene Helgo
Player
Phillis Vanenburg
40%
(
53 of
133)
1st Serve %
57%
(
71 of
124)
2
Aces
4
11
Double Faults
13
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
33%
(
26 of
80)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
18 of
53)
42%
(
11 of
26)
Break Points Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
54%
(
72 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
72 of
124)
133
Total Points Won
124
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Merel Hoedt
Player
Phillis Vanenburg
50%
(
21 of
42)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
57)
0
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
8
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
38%
(
16 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
SF | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-1 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
SF | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-4 0-6 6-2 | H2H | |||
R2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H |
view more