Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Suzan Lamens vs Nadia Podoroska Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lamens vs Podoroska analysis and find out who is favored!
Suzan Lamens vs Nadia Podoroska Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lamens has won 43.75% of points on his second serve, while Podoroska has won 45.13%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lamens, in recent form, has won 56.23% of his opponent's second serve points, while Podoroska has won 55.35%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.73% and 36.25% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lamens has saved 54.73% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Podoroska has saved 57.21% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lamens has won 64.56% of matches played (W/L 51/ 28), with Podoroska winning 51.47% (W/L 35/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lamens has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 173/ 111), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Podoroska has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 249/ 125), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 4/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Lamens has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 67.16% of matches (W/L 45/ 22), where as Podoroska has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 43.33% of matches (W/L 13/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lamens winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Lamens winning 2 and Podoroska winning 0. The last match between Lamens and Podoroska was at the W25 Den Haag, 03-07-2019, First, Clay with Suzan Lamens getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:9:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lamens and Podoroska have played a deciding set 0 times, with Lamens winning 0 times and Podoroska 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Lamens winning 0, and Podoroska 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lamens has played against opponents with an average rank of 234.59 while Podoroska has played against players with an average rank of 164.75.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lamens has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Podoroska has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lamens has converted 50.13% of breakpoint opportunities, and Podoroska has converted 38.28% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lamens 1 - 0 Podoroska
163
Rank
153
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
65
Rank
36
High
27
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
Form
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
58% (261-188)
Career Total W/L
63% (381-226)
73% (22-8)
YTD W/L
50% (11-11)
$40,693
Career Prize Money
$1,547,821
1
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Suzan Lamens | Nadia Podoroska |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:9:0 | 1:9:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 51% (27/53) | 71% (25/35) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (18/27) | 24% (6/25) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (12/26) | 0% (0/10) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (7/7) | 30% (3/10) |
| Return Points W% | 83% (29/35) | 43% (23/53) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-3 |
Stats 
Suzan Lamens
Player
Nadia Podoroska
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve %
71%
(
25 of
35)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
83%
(
29 of
35)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Suzan Lamens | Nadia Podoroska |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 73% (22/8) | 50% (11/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 64% (45/25) | 48% (24/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (361/276) | 50% (229/232) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 46% (6/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 83% (10/2) | 71% (5/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 79% (11/3) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.19 | 0.11 |
| Aces Total | 59 | 25 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.33 |
| DFs Total | 87 | 74 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:30:59 | 1:34:52 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 259.37 | 183.73 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1148/1886) | 66% (916/1385) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (732/1148) | 63% (577/916) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (337/738) | 43% (203/469) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (127/254) | 38% (73/191) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (902/1892) | 44% (659/1498) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/3) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (4/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (2/2) | 13% (1/7) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 76% (16/5) | 100% (5/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 72% (21/29) | 50% (11/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (2/8) | 63% (5/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 89% (8/9) | 67% (4/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 95% (19/18) | 89% (9/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 5% (19/1) | 11% (9/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 36% (11/4) | 23% (13/3) |
Suzan Lamens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Aliona Falei
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
56
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Julia Avdeeva
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
3
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
11
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
9 of
34)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Emiliana Arango
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve %
78%
(
53 of
68)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Nuria Brancaccio
Player
Suzan Lamens
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
53%
(
17 of
32)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
21 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Maria Camila Torres Murcia
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
10
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
18 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julia Riera
Player
Suzan Lamens
48%
(
29 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Nadia Podoroska Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mirra Andreeva
Player
Nadia Podoroska
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Pigossi
Player
Nadia Podoroska
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Francesca Jones
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
71%
(
27 of
38)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Elisabetta Cocciaretto
69%
(
71 of
103)
1st Serve %
64%
(
89 of
138)
3
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
10
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
52 of
89)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
40%
(
41 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
65 of
138)
127
Total Points Won
114
|
6-7(5) 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
79)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Marina Stakusic
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
51%
(
40 of
79)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
12
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Mccartney Kessler
59%
(
65 of
110)
1st Serve %
56%
(
58 of
104)
0
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
10
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
38%
(
17 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
45 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
104)
112
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cori Gauff
Player
Nadia Podoroska
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
87%
(
34 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
70
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Julia Riera
69%
(
71 of
103)
1st Serve %
57%
(
61 of
107)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
17 of
46)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
107)
114
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(7) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Anastasia Potapova
Player
Nadia Podoroska
48%
(
22 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Lamens Vs Podoroska Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
