J. Pegula
To Win
M. Uchijima
To Win
Suzan Lamens vs Moyuka Uchijima Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W W W W W L L
Form
L W L W W W W L W WHead To Head: Lamens 1 - 1 Uchijima
They have played 4 sets in total, with Lamens winning 2 and Uchijima winning 2. The last match between Lamens and Uchijima was at the Miami Open - Miami, 19-03-2025, First, Hard with Moyuka Uchijima getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Suzan Lamens | 1 |
| Moyuka Uchijima | 1 |
Miami Open - Miami(19-03-2025)
6
4
6
3
| Lamens | Stats | Uchijima |
|---|---|---|
| 58% (15-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 56% (15-12) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 73 | Ranking | 56 |
| 64 | Highest Rank | 51 |
| 25 | Age | 23 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 8 | Titles | 13 |
| 58% (300-218) | Career Total W/L | 60% (254-168) |
| $426,753 | Career Prize Money | $776,006 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Draper VS Berrettini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Khachanov VS Paul PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Suzan Lamens
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
||||
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Moyuka Uchijima
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 19 | Games Won | 19 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:32:59 | Average Match Time | 1:32:59 |
| 63% (95/150) | 1st Serve % | 58% (86/148) |
| 69% (66/95) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (57/86) |
| 38% (21/55) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (26/62) |
| 26% (5/19) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (5/20) |
| 44% (65/148) | Return Points Win % | 42% (63/150) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Suzan Lamens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Emma Raducanu
Player
Suzan Lamens
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Olga Danilovic
Player
Suzan Lamens
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
55%
(
18 of
33)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
48%
(
24 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Linda Noskova
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
5
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Bianca Vanessa Andreescu
59%
(
55 of
94)
1st Serve %
67%
(
73 of
109)
2
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
1
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
44 of
73)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
95
|
6-1 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Katie Boulter
106%
(
69 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Tatjana Maria
117%
(
70 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
1
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
2
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
39 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Suzan Lamens
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Rybakina
Player
Suzan Lamens
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Marie Bouzkova
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
54%
(
51 of
95)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
10
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Moyuka Uchijima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Ons Jabeur
65%
(
62 of
96)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
35 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Robin Montgomery
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
72%
(
58 of
81)
2
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
6
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
81)
78
Total Points Won
74
|
1-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Olga Danilovic
Player
Moyuka Uchijima
65%
(
75 of
116)
1st Serve %
66%
(
65 of
98)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
44 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
98)
113
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(9) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Lois Boisson
63%
(
55 of
87)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
99)
0
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
48%
(
42 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
99)
87
Total Points Won
99
|
1-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Nuria Brancaccio
62%
(
52 of
84)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
0
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
83)
91
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Marina Stakusic
108%
(
81 of
75)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Anca Alexia Todoni
115%
(
68 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
75 of
114)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
42 of
75)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
52 of
114)
109
Total Points Won
102
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna Kalinskaya
Player
Moyuka Uchijima
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Suzan Lamens
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cori Gauff
Player
Moyuka Uchijima
65%
(
81 of
125)
1st Serve %
54%
(
60 of
111)
4
Aces
0
21
Double Faults
5
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
25%
(
11 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
48%
(
60 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
111)
120
Total Points Won
116
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (300/218) | Win/Loss | 60% (254/168) |
| 56% (664/521) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (558/410) |
| 53% (5717/5072) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (4714/4192) |
| 54% (80/67) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (148/106) |
| 61% (187/121) | Clay Win/Loss | 70% (75/32) |
| 57% (32/24) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (28/23) |
| 14% (1/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 30% (3/7) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
| 845 | Aces Total | 912 |
| 0.47 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 2447 | Total Double Faults | 1438 |
| 1:29:15 | Average Match Time | 1:24:30 |
| 428.41 | Average Opponent Rank | 283.16 |
| 59% (18268/31021) | 1st Serve % | 60% (15279/25421) |
| 62% (11281/18221) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (9677/15222) |
| 43% (5469/12825) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (4704/10212) |
| 51% (2100/4135) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1518/3175) |
| 48% (14961/31166) | Return Points Win % | 45% (11558/25465) |
| 25% (3/9) | Slam W/L | 57% (16/12) |
| 40% (4/6) | Masters W/L | 60% (15/10) |
| 73% (11/4) | Cups W/L | 67% (8/4) |
| 54% (27/23) | Main Tour W/L | 33% (17/34) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 62% (166/101) | Challenger W/L | 63% (175/104) |
| 54% (89/75) | Futures W/L | 85% (23/4) |
| 58% (297/514) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (253/420) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 49% (48/97) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (52/99) |
| 56% (85/151) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (74/124) |
| 91% (274/248) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (223/207) |
| 9% (274/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (223/16) |
| 21% (244/52) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (199/47) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
