Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Suzan Lamens vs Mihaela Djakovic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lamens vs Djakovic analysis and find out who is favored!
Suzan Lamens vs Mihaela Djakovic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lamens has won 43.31% of points on his second serve, while Djakovic has won 45.12%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lamens, in recent form, has won 56.95% of his opponent's second serve points, while Djakovic has won 55.47%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.75% and 41.12% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lamens has saved 54.39% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Djakovic has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lamens has won 63.29% of matches played (W/L 50/ 29), with Djakovic winning 50% (W/L 27/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lamens has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 172/ 111), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Djakovic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 75/ 56), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 61/ 60).
- Player level: In the last year, Lamens has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 65.67% of matches (W/L 44/ 23), where as Djakovic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.35% of matches (W/L 19/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lamens winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Lamens winning 2 and Djakovic winning 1. The last match between Lamens and Djakovic was at the W25 Platja D'Aro, 18-05-2021, Q3, Clay with Suzan Lamens getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:1:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lamens and Djakovic have played a deciding set 1 times, with Lamens winning 1 times and Djakovic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Lamens winning 0, and Djakovic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lamens has played against opponents with an average rank of 240.04 while Djakovic has played against players with an average rank of 156.83.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lamens has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Djakovic has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lamens has converted 50.4% of breakpoint opportunities, and Djakovic has converted 45.24% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lamens 1 - 0 Djakovic
163
Rank
153
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
741
Rank
671
High
22
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
Form
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
58% (260-188)
Career Total W/L
54% (145-122)
72% (21-8)
YTD W/L
42% (5-7)
$40,693
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Suzan Lamens | Mihaela Djakovic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 21 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:1:0 | 2:1:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (48/73) | 72% (49/68) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (31/48) | 61% (30/49) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (13/25) | 53% (10/19) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 38% (3/8) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (28/68) | 40% (29/73) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 7-5 10-3 |
Stats 
Suzan Lamens
Player
Mihaela Djakovic
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
72%
(
49 of
68)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
69
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Suzan Lamens | Mihaela Djakovic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 72% (21/8) | 42% (5/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (43/25) | 44% (11/14) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (349/271) | 51% (110/106) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 40% (2/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 82% (9/2) | 43% (3/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 79% (11/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.19 | 0.14 |
| Aces Total | 57 | 15 |
| DFs per game | 0.29 | 0.27 |
| DFs Total | 87 | 29 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:31:15 | 1:22:5 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 268.31 | 288.08 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1112/1835) | 60% (344/575) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (709/1112) | 60% (208/344) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (328/723) | 47% (108/231) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (122/245) | 47% (36/76) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (878/1840) | 47% (293/624) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (4/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 75% (15/5) | 40% (2/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 71% (20/28) | 40% (4/10) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (2/8) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 89% (8/9) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 94% (18/17) | 83% (6/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 6% (18/1) | 17% (6/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 36% (11/4) | 0% (6/0) |
Suzan Lamens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Julia Avdeeva
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
3
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
11
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
9 of
34)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Emiliana Arango
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve %
78%
(
53 of
68)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Nuria Brancaccio
Player
Suzan Lamens
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
53%
(
17 of
32)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
21 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Maria Camila Torres Murcia
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
10
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
18 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julia Riera
Player
Suzan Lamens
48%
(
29 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Linda Fruhvirtova
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
10
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
2-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Mihaela Djakovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Sinclair Rogers
Player
Mihaela Djakovic
61%
(
59 of
96)
1st Serve %
78%
(
52 of
67)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
46%
(
44 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
84
Total Points Won
79
|
2-6 6-4 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Hanne Vandewinkel
Player
Mihaela Djakovic
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
5
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
44%
(
20 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mihaela Djakovic
Player
Iva Primorac
54%
(
15 of
28)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
12 of
15)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
10 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
41
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Lucia Cortez Llorca
Player
Mihaela Djakovic
52%
(
34 of
66)
1st Serve %
49%
(
32 of
65)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
47%
(
31 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mihaela Djakovic
Player
Ivet Sala Sanchez
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve %
49%
(
19 of
39)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
51
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fiona Ganz
Player
Mihaela Djakovic
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mihaela Djakovic
Player
Sofia Carpi
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
82%
(
14 of
17)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
100%
(
10 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
3 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mihaela Djakovic
Player
Carmen Lopez Martinez
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Lamens Vs Djakovic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Suzan Lamens
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
