S. Lamens
To Win
A. Krueger
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W L L W L LForm
W L W L W W W L W LThey have played 2 sets in total, with Lamens winning 0 and Raducanu winning 2. The last match between Lamens and Raducanu was at the Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid, 23-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Emma Raducanu getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-4.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Suzan Lamens | 0 |
Emma Raducanu | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid(23-04-2025)
Lamens | Stats | Raducanu |
---|---|---|
55% (16-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 55% (12-10) |
0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
67 | Ranking | 43 |
64 | Highest Rank | 10 |
25 | Age | 22 |
- | Plays | R |
8 | Titles | 4 |
58% (301-220) | Career Total W/L | 65% (133-72) |
$447,968 | Career Prize Money | $4,512,452 |
0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
25 May 2025 / First
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris atp
23 May 2025 / Q3
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(4) 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Emma Raducanu
Player
Suzan Lamens
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
75
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
0 | Sets Won | 2 |
10 | Games Won | 13 |
2 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
7 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
1:58:19 | Average Match Time | 1:58:19 |
64% (51/80) | 1st Serve % | 61% (45/74) |
67% (34/51) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (25/45) |
38% (11/29) | 2nd Serve Win % | 66% (19/29) |
38% (3/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 57% (4/7) |
41% (30/74) | Return Points Win % | 44% (35/80) |
0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
When evaluating recent performance on the second serve, one might ask, how crucial is the ability to secure points? Raducanu has captured 37.07% of points on her second serve in the last six months, whereas Lamens edges slightly ahead, clinching 39.73%. This statistic holds significant weight in foretelling the match's likely outcome.
Turn your focus to the return game: what does it reveal? Raducanu showcases her prowess by winning 52.96% of her opponent's second serve points, while Lamens secures 50.76%. When it comes to the first serve returns, these figures adjust to 32.67% for Raducanu and 31.34% for Lamens. This comparison is a valuable indicator of who might emerge victorious in this head-to-head clash.
Analyzing the ability to handle pressure, we find Raducanu has defended successfully against 46.58% of breakpoints in recent months. In contrast, Lamens has managed a slightly better rate of 47.12%, making this detail noteworthy for those interested in in-game betting predictions.
Let’s dive into the overall performance: in the past year, Raducanu has emerged victorious in 60% of her matches with a win-loss record of 21/14, while Lamens has a slightly lower win rate at 56.06% (W/L 37/29). This gives an overarching perspective on the head-to-head dynamics.
Surface specialization is another deciding factor: Raducanu shines on Hard courts with a 68% win rate (W/L 85/40) but shows vulnerability on Grass with 54% (W/L 13/11). Conversely, Lamens prefers Clay courts, maintaining a 61% win record (W/L 187/120) and struggles on Grass with just a 14% win rate (W/L 1/6).
Interestingly, who faces tougher opponents regularly? Over the past year, Raducanu has contended against players ranked an average of 68.4, a stark contrast to Lamens’ competition averaging a rank of 197.65. Crucial when assessing player level and outcome predictions.
For the drama of deciding sets, Raducanu emerges victorious 33% of the time over the last year, while Lamens outperforms her with a 57% success rate. This statistic is insightful for live predictions if the match extends to a deciding set.
In breakpoint scenarios, precision becomes key. Raducanu has converted 38.6% of her chances, slightly outpacing Lamens’ 36.45%. This nuance can tip the scales during live betting situations.
We’ll conclude with a prediction shaped by these statistics: Raducanu, with her tenacity on hard courts and impressive opponent quality stats, may have the slight edge when evaluating the plethora of data available. Lamens, while formidable, may find Raducanu a tough competitor to best in this encounter. Who will triumph? Only the unfolding match will tell.
Lamens vs Raducanu Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Suzan Lamens
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
8
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Elise Mertens
Player
Suzan Lamens
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
93)
6
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
6
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
96
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Suzan Lamens
Player
Renata Zarazua
49%
(
32 of
65)
1st Serve %
73%
(
56 of
77)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
30 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-1 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Emma Raducanu
Player
Suzan Lamens
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Olga Danilovic
Player
Suzan Lamens
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Suzan Lamens
Player
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
55%
(
18 of
33)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
48%
(
24 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Suzan Lamens
Player
Linda Noskova
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
5
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Suzan Lamens
Player
Bianca Vanessa Andreescu
59%
(
55 of
94)
1st Serve %
67%
(
73 of
109)
2
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
1
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
44 of
73)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
95
|
6-1 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Danielle Rose Collins
Player
Emma Raducanu
57%
(
56 of
99)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
10
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
36%
(
36 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
97
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Emma Raducanu
Player
Daria Kasatkina
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
49%
(
26 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R4 |
![]() ![]()
Cori Gauff
Player
Emma Raducanu
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Emma Raducanu
Player
Veronika Kudermetova
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
40 of
74)
90
Total Points Won
67
|
5-7 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Emma Raducanu
Player
Jil Teichmann
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Emma Raducanu
Player
Maya Joint
62%
(
63 of
102)
1st Serve %
70%
(
81 of
115)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
46 of
81)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
39 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
52 of
115)
115
Total Points Won
102
|
7-5 6-7(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Marta Kostyuk
Player
Emma Raducanu
51%
(
39 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
58 of
92)
1
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
4
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
84
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Emma Raducanu
Player
Suzan Lamens
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
58% (301/220) | Win/Loss | 65% (133/72) |
56% (667/526) | Sets Win/Loss | 64% (292/165) |
53% (5751/5109) | Games Win/Loss | 56% (2323/1832) |
54% (80/67) | Hard Win/Loss | 68% (85/40) |
60% (188/123) | Clay Win/Loss | 58% (15/11) |
57% (32/24) | Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (20/10) |
14% (1/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 54% (13/11) |
0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.29 |
848 | Aces Total | 586 |
0.47 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.34 |
2465 | Total Double Faults | 681 |
1:29:27 | Average Match Time | 1:39:21 |
427.36 | Average Opponent Rank | 271.99 |
59% (18396/31247) | 1st Serve % | 65% (8717/13400) |
62% (11353/18349) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (5691/8717) |
43% (5515/12923) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (2177/4682) |
51% (2114/4168) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (827/1720) |
48% (15062/31394) | Return Points Win % | 46% (6239/13536) |
25% (3/9) | Slam W/L | 66% (23/12) |
42% (5/7) | Masters W/L | 51% (19/18) |
73% (11/4) | Cups W/L | 86% (6/1) |
53% (27/24) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (24/24) |
62% (166/101) | Challenger W/L | 74% (39/14) |
54% (89/75) | Futures W/L | 88% (22/3) |
58% (298/517) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (131/195) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
49% (48/97) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 67% (31/46) |
56% (86/153) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (28/53) |
90% (276/249) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (136/122) |
10% (276/27) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (136/13) |
21% (245/52) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (69/12) |