Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Suzan Lamens vs Caijsa Wilda Hennemann Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lamens vs Hennemann analysis and find out who is favored!
Suzan Lamens vs Caijsa Wilda Hennemann Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lamens has won 43.75% of points on his second serve, while Hennemann has won 45.1%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lamens, in recent form, has won 56.23% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hennemann has won 55.78%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.73% and 45.52% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lamens has saved 54.73% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hennemann has saved 50.58% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lamens has won 64.56% of matches played (W/L 51/ 28), with Hennemann winning 63.49% (W/L 40/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lamens has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 173/ 111), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Hennemann has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 14/ 8), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 26/ 17).
- Player level: In the last year, Lamens has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 67.16% of matches (W/L 45/ 22), where as Hennemann has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.29% of matches (W/L 19/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lamens winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Lamens winning 1 and Hennemann winning 2. The last match between Lamens and Hennemann was at the W25 Den Haag, 30-06-2022, Second, Clay with Caijsa Wilda Hennemann getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:31:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lamens and Hennemann have played a deciding set 1 times, with Lamens winning 0 times and Hennemann 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Lamens winning 0, and Hennemann 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lamens has played against opponents with an average rank of 234.59 while Hennemann has played against players with an average rank of 270.32.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lamens has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hennemann has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lamens has converted 50.13% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hennemann has converted 48.52% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lamens 0 - 1 Hennemann
163
Rank
153
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
444
Rank
283
High
23
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
58% (261-188)
Career Total W/L
62% (154-96)
73% (22-8)
YTD W/L
74% (20-7)
$40,693
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Suzan Lamens | Caijsa Wilda Hennemann |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 14 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 10 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:31:0 | 2:31:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (53/87) | 61% (60/99) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 66% (35/53) | 57% (34/60) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 41% (14/34) | 51% (20/39) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 45% (5/11) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (45/99) | 44% (38/87) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 2-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Suzan Lamens
61%
(
60 of
99)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
10
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
45%
(
45 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
92
Total Points Won
94
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Suzan Lamens | Caijsa Wilda Hennemann |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 73% (22/8) | 74% (20/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 64% (45/25) | 73% (43/16) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (361/276) | 57% (318/237) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 89% (8/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 83% (10/2) | 73% (8/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 79% (11/3) | 57% (4/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.19 | 0.12 |
| Aces Total | 59 | 31 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 87 | 50 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:30:59 | 1:41:31 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 259.37 | 282.48 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1148/1886) | 69% (1096/1588) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (732/1148) | 62% (681/1096) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (337/738) | 45% (219/492) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (127/254) | 50% (124/250) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (902/1892) | 51% (786/1553) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (4/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 76% (16/5) | 60% (6/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 86% (12/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 72% (21/29) | 74% (20/27) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (2/8) | 75% (3/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 89% (8/9) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 95% (19/18) | 91% (22/20) |
| 1st set W, L | 5% (19/1) | 9% (22/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 36% (11/4) | 0% (5/0) |
Suzan Lamens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Aliona Falei
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
56
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Julia Avdeeva
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
3
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
11
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
9 of
34)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Emiliana Arango
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve %
78%
(
53 of
68)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Nuria Brancaccio
Player
Suzan Lamens
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
53%
(
17 of
32)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
21 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Maria Camila Torres Murcia
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
10
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
18 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julia Riera
Player
Suzan Lamens
48%
(
29 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 2 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Despina Papamichail
Player
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
70%
(
67 of
96)
1st Serve %
70%
(
56 of
80)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
4
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
46%
(
44 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
91
Total Points Won
85
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Louisa Chirico
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
20%
(
4 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Mina Hodzic
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Iva Primorac
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
10
50%
(
22 of
44)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
28 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
43 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Anastasia Iamachkine
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
87%
(
34 of
39)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Mina Hodzic
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
72%
(
42 of
58)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Lamens Vs Hennemann Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Suzan Lamens
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
