S. Lamens
To Win
A. Krueger
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W L L W L LForm
L W L L W W W L W LThey have played 3 sets in total, with Lamens winning 2 and Andreescu winning 1. The last match between Lamens and Andreescu was at the Open Capfinances Rouen Metropole - Rouen, 16-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Suzan Lamens getting the victory 6-1 4-6 7-6(2).
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Suzan Lamens | 1 |
Bianca Vanessa Andreescu | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Open Capfinances Rouen Metropole - Rouen(16-04-2025)
Lamens | Stats | Andreescu |
---|---|---|
55% (16-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (5-5) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
67 | Ranking | 102 |
64 | Highest Rank | 4 |
25 | Age | 24 |
- | Plays | R |
8 | Titles | 9 |
58% (301-220) | Career Total W/L | 66% (210-107) |
$447,968 | Career Prize Money | $8,301,987 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris wta
23 May 2025 / Q3
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 4-6 7-6(2) |
![]() ![]()
Suzan Lamens
Player
Bianca Vanessa Andreescu
59%
(
55 of
94)
1st Serve %
67%
(
73 of
109)
2
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
1
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
44 of
73)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
95
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 1 |
17 | Games Won | 13 |
2 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
6 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
2:34:32 | Average Match Time | 2:34:32 |
59% (55/94) | 1st Serve % | 67% (73/109) |
71% (39/55) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (44/73) |
56% (22/39) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (18/36) |
36% (4/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (2/5) |
43% (47/109) | Return Points Win % | 35% (33/94) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
When assessing recent performance, Andreescu's effectiveness on second serves shows a win rate of 36.36% over the past six months, whereas Lamens slightly outperforms with a win rate of 39.96%. This metric is crucial for predicting match outcomes with greater accuracy. Comparisons of their return game statistics reveal that Andreescu has been more successful at winning 56.41% of her opponent's second serve points, contrasted with Lamens' 50.94%. When it comes to first serve returns, Lamens has a higher success rate at 31.12% compared to Andreescu's 21.92%, which can influence predictions about who is favored in their head-to-head matchup.
Looking at performance under pressure, Andreescu has demonstrated an ability to save 45.45% of breakpoints in recent matches, while Lamens is closely behind at 45.39%. These figures are essential for evaluating in-game betting opportunities. Regarding overall performance in matches over the last 12 months, Andreescu has won 52.38% (W/L 11/10), whereas Lamens has secured more victories with a win rate of 58.21% (W/L 39/28).
Analyzing their preferred playing surfaces, Andreescu exhibits her best career win percentage on Hard courts at 71% (W/L 128/52), and her least favorable surface is Indoor Hard courts at 54% (W/L 21/18). On the contrary, Lamens shows a strong preference for Clay, boasting a win rate of 61% (W/L 184/119), while Grass courts appear less favorable with a 14% win rate (W/L 1/6).
Both players have predominantly competed on the Main tour over the past year. Andreescu has achieved a 58.33% win rate (W/L 7/5), slightly lower than Lamens' 60% (W/L 18/12). These stats must be contextualized considering the level of competition they have faced. Andreescu's competition has had an average rank of 144.57 compared to Lamens', who contend against opponents ranked at an average of 202.06.
Deciding set performance can also provide insights, with Lamens winning 58% of deciding sets in the past year, overshadowing Andreescu's 43% win rate. Additionally, recent data shows Andreescu's break point conversion rate is 37.5%, marginally higher than Lamens' 36.67%, which could influence live betting strategies during the match.
Considering these statistics and analyses, Lamens appears marginally more favorable due to her overall higher win rates, effectiveness on returns, and deciding set success. Based on these insights, Lamens holds a slight edge and is predicted to win this match.
Lamens vs Andreescu Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Suzan Lamens
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
8
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Elise Mertens
Player
Suzan Lamens
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
93)
6
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
6
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
96
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Suzan Lamens
Player
Renata Zarazua
49%
(
32 of
65)
1st Serve %
73%
(
56 of
77)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
30 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-1 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Emma Raducanu
Player
Suzan Lamens
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Olga Danilovic
Player
Suzan Lamens
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Suzan Lamens
Player
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
55%
(
18 of
33)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
48%
(
24 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Suzan Lamens
Player
Linda Noskova
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
5
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Suzan Lamens
Player
Bianca Vanessa Andreescu
59%
(
55 of
94)
1st Serve %
67%
(
73 of
109)
2
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
1
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
44 of
73)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
95
|
6-1 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 |
![]() ![]()
Nao Hibino
Player
Bianca Vanessa Andreescu
80%
(
78 of
98)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
99)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
38 of
99)
97
Total Points Won
100
|
2-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Bianca Vanessa Andreescu
Player
Xinxin Yao
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve %
61%
(
23 of
38)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
51
Total Points Won
20
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
R4 |
![]() ![]()
Qinwen Zheng
Player
Bianca Vanessa Andreescu
46%
(
26 of
57)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
1
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
0
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Bianca Vanessa Andreescu
Player
Elena Rybakina
88%
(
56 of
64)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
57)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Bianca Vanessa Andreescu
Player
Donna Vekic
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve %
46%
(
42 of
91)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
11
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
17 of
49)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
91)
90
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Bianca Vanessa Andreescu
Player
Federica Urgesi
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
14 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Bianca Vanessa Andreescu
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
51%
(
27 of
53)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
6
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Elena Rybakina
Player
Bianca Vanessa Andreescu
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
58% (301/220) | Win/Loss | 66% (210/107) |
56% (667/526) | Sets Win/Loss | 62% (460/278) |
53% (5751/5109) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (3777/3106) |
54% (80/67) | Hard Win/Loss | 71% (128/52) |
60% (188/123) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (33/19) |
57% (32/24) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54% (21/18) |
14% (1/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 61% (28/18) |
0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
848 | Aces Total | 746 |
0.47 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
2465 | Total Double Faults | 997 |
1:29:27 | Average Match Time | 1:39:10 |
427.36 | Average Opponent Rank | 374.66 |
59% (18396/31247) | 1st Serve % | 62% (13283/21260) |
62% (11353/18349) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (8656/13283) |
43% (5515/12923) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (3911/7971) |
51% (2114/4168) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1240/2678) |
48% (15062/31394) | Return Points Win % | 45% (9802/21775) |
25% (3/9) | Slam W/L | 64% (37/21) |
42% (5/7) | Masters W/L | 64% (44/25) |
73% (11/4) | Cups W/L | 67% (8/4) |
53% (27/24) | Main Tour W/L | 58% (38/28) |
62% (166/101) | Challenger W/L | 74% (83/29) |
54% (89/75) | Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) |
58% (298/517) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (206/308) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
49% (48/97) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (52/95) |
56% (86/153) | Deciding Set Win % | 62% (66/107) |
90% (276/249) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (207/179) |
10% (276/27) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (207/28) |
21% (245/52) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 28% (110/31) |