Prediction of Suzan Lamens vs Belinda Bencic Head-to-Head, Best Odds & Picks At Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
58% (289-210)
Career Total W/L
66% (408-208)
57% (4-3)
YTD W/L
75% (6-2)
$349,233
Career Prize Money
$9,543,621
0
YTD Titles
0
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Belinda Bencic
Player
Suzan Lamens
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
42 of
74)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
8 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
| stats | Suzan Lamens | Belinda Bencic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 7 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 5 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:0 | 1:40:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (42/74) | 65% (37/57) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 57% (24/42) | 62% (23/37) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 25% (8/32) | 50% (10/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 55% (6/11) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (24/57) | 57% (42/74) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Suzan Lamens vs Belinda Bencic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Lamens 0 - 1 Bencic
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lamens has won 45.53% of points on their second serve, while Bencic has won 45.84%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lamens, in recent form, has won 54.06% of their opponent's second serve points, while Bencic has won 65.97%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.73% and 39.26% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lamens has saved 54.9% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bencic has saved 62.5% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lamens has won 63.64% of matches played (W/L 49/ 28), with Bencic winning 77.78% (W/L 14/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lamens has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 30/ 20), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 14% (W/L 1/ 6). Bencic has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 68% (W/L 56/ 26), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 77/ 46).
- Player level: In the last year, Lamens has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 24/ 12), where as Bencic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 77.78% of matches (W/L 7/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lamens winning 0 times and Bencic being victorious 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Lamens winning 0 and Bencic winning 2. The last match between Lamens and Bencic was at the Australian Open - Melbourne, 15-01-2025, Second, Hard with Belinda Bencic getting the victory 6-1 7-6(3).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:40:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lamens and Bencic have played a deciding set 0 times, with Lamens winning 0 times and Bencic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Lamens winning 0, and Bencic 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lamens has played against opponents with an average rank of 192.14 while Bencic has played against players with an average rank of 180.78.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lamens has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bencic has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lamens has converted 51.91% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bencic has converted 50% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Suzan Lamens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Belinda Bencic
Player
Suzan Lamens
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
42 of
74)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
8 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Veronika Erjavec
57%
(
54 of
94)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
79)
3
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
2
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
94
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Suzan Lamens
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
8
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Renee Alame
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
6%
(
1 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Suzan Lamens
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Magdalena Frech
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Kamilla Rakhimova
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Leolia Jeanjean
Player
Suzan Lamens
66%
(
59 of
89)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
84)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
84)
90
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Robin Anderson
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nina Stojanovic
Player
Suzan Lamens
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Belinda Bencic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Belinda Bencic
Player
Suzan Lamens
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
42 of
74)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
8 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Belinda Bencic
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
52%
(
41 of
79)
2
Aces
8
8
Double Faults
10
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liudmila Samsonova
Player
Belinda Bencic
59%
(
63 of
107)
1st Serve %
65%
(
67 of
103)
8
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
6
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
48 of
67)
41%
(
18 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
38%
(
41 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
107
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(3) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Belinda Bencic
Player
Anna Kalinskaya
57%
(
17 of
30)
1st Serve %
54%
(
20 of
37)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
88%
(
15 of
17)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
8 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
43
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Belinda Bencic
Player
Laura Siegemund
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Belinda Bencic
Player
Moyuka Uchijima
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Robin |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Belinda Bencic
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
41%
(
16 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Robin |
Stats
Belinda Bencic
Player
Chloe Paquet
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Alycia Parks
Player
Belinda Bencic
55%
(
47 of
86)
1st Serve %
71%
(
80 of
113)
14
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
8
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
53 of
80)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
21%
(
4 of
19)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
50 of
113)
108
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(4) 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Belinda Bencic
Player
Dominika Salkova
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve %
42%
(
21 of
50)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Lamens vs Bencic?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Lamens Vs Bencic is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Suzan Lamens | Belinda Bencic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (4/3) | 75% (6/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (8/6) | 76% (13/4) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (68/66) | 59% (87/61) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) | 75% (6/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.18 | 0.18 |
| Aces Total | 12 | 13 |
| DFs per game | 0.38 | 0.42 |
| DFs Total | 25 | 30 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:28:8 | 1:35:11 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 98.43 | 52.75 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (259/451) | 64% (306/481) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (171/259) | 68% (208/306) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (89/192) | 44% (77/175) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (21/44) | 47% (34/73) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (180/414) | 49% (239/483) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 100% (2/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 60% (3/2) | 67% (4/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (4/7) | 75% (6/8) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (4/4) | 100% (6/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (4/0) | 0% (6/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Belinda Bencic
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
