Suzan Lamens vs Ashlyn Krueger Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L L L W W L L
Form
L L W L W L W L W LHead-To-Head: Lamens 0 - 2 Krueger
They have played 4 sets in total, with Lamens winning 0 and Krueger winning 4. The last match between Lamens and Krueger was at the French Open - Paris, 27-05-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Ashlyn Krueger getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Suzan Lamens | 0 |
| Ashlyn Krueger | 2 |
LAST H2H MATCH: French Open - Paris(27-05-2025)
Ashlyn Krueger
Suzan Lamens
6
3
6
4
| Lamens | Stats | Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| 53% (18-16) | YTD Win/Loss | 57% (20-15) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 70 | Ranking | 33 |
| 64 | Highest Rank | 33 |
| 25 | Age | 21 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 8 | Titles | 3 |
| 58% (303-223) | Career Total W/L | 57% (156-116) |
| $447,968 | Career Prize Money | $1,207,978 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sinner VS Hanfmann PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
17 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Halys VS Medvedev PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
18 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Suzan Lamens
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
5
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
49%
(
34 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
| 7-5 6-0 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Suzan Lamens
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 12 | Games Won | 25 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 1:15:45 | Average Match Time | 1:15:45 |
| 57% (56/99) | 1st Serve % | 62% (74/119) |
| 48% (27/56) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (51/74) |
| 28% (12/43) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (20/45) |
| 67% (6/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 75% (12/16) |
| 40% (48/119) | Return Points Win % | 61% (60/99) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Lamens vs Krueger Match Preview :
- In the last six months, Krueger has performed better on second serves, winning 42.26% of points compared to Lamens' 38.92%.
- Who has the better return game recently? Lamens slightly leads with 50.13% of second-serve returns compared to Krueger's 49.13%.
- Under pressure, Lamens has a small edge, saving 48.52% of breakpoints compared to 46.67% for Krueger.
- Overall match performance in the past year indicates Krueger wins 57.63% of matches while Lamens wins 55.22%.
- Krueger shows a strong preference for Grass surfaces with a 67% win rate, whereas Lamens excels on Clay with a 60% win rate.
- Both players have similar success levels on the Main tour over the past year, with Krueger winning 60.71% and Lamens winning 60% of their matches.
- Krueger won their only previous direct head-to-head encounter, securing both sets against Lamens.
- Krueger has faced tougher opponents recently, with an average ranking of 73.02, compared to Lamens' 123.9.
- In deciding sets, Krueger has a slight advantage, winning 58% of these sets compared to Lamens' 56% over the last year.
- Krueger is more efficient at converting breakpoints in recent matches, achieving a 40.48% conversion rate against Lamens' 34.5%.
Editorial Prediction (May 27, 2025, UTC):
The match-up analysis shows Krueger as the slightly superior server and with a better rate of winning higher-ranked separation matches.
Lamen's strength in return games and saving breakpoints could put Krueger under pressure at pivotal moments.
However, Krueger's superior performance in tie-break scenarios combined with previous head-to-head victories suggests an overall advantage.
Therefore, given these competitive outlined statistics, Krueger is favored to come out on top in this upcoming match.
Lamens vs Krueger Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Suzan Lamens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Leylah Annie Fernandez
Player
Suzan Lamens
63%
(
59 of
93)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
99)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
38%
(
35 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elisabetta Cocciaretto
Player
Suzan Lamens
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Ann Li
66%
(
61 of
92)
1st Serve %
48%
(
54 of
113)
2
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
3
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
35%
(
11 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
39 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
51 of
113)
104
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Yanina Wickmayer
52%
(
37 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
48 of
72)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
31 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Suzan Lamens
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
5
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
49%
(
34 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Suzan Lamens
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
8
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Suzan Lamens
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
93)
6
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
6
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
96
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Renata Zarazua
49%
(
32 of
65)
1st Serve %
73%
(
56 of
77)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
30 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-1 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Ashlyn Krueger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Katerina Siniakova
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mirra Andreeva
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Suzan Lamens
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
5
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
49%
(
34 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Beatriz Haddad Maia
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Mccartney Kessler
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
50%
(
35 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jessica Pegula
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
48%
(
30 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Anna Bondar
78%
(
58 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
56 of
85)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
20 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
68
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (303/223) | Win/Loss | 57% (156/116) |
| 56% (672/533) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (348/279) |
| 53% (5806/5175) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (3036/2811) |
| 54% (80/67) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (106/77) |
| 60% (188/124) | Clay Win/Loss | 55% (34/28) |
| 57% (32/24) | Indoor Hard W/L | 43% (3/4) |
| 27% (3/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 65% (13/7) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
| 859 | Aces Total | 699 |
| 0.47 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.38 |
| 2489 | Total Double Faults | 1094 |
| 1:29:40 | Average Match Time | 1:33:6 |
| 428.9 | Average Opponent Rank | 289.47 |
| 59% (18625/31623) | 1st Serve % | 64% (11466/17860) |
| 62% (11488/18578) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (7263/11466) |
| 43% (5574/13070) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (2829/6394) |
| 51% (2135/4215) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1006/2220) |
| 48% (15236/31806) | Return Points Win % | 45% (8106/18077) |
| 23% (3/10) | Slam W/L | 45% (10/12) |
| 42% (5/7) | Masters W/L | 54% (27/23) |
| 73% (11/4) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (29/26) | Main Tour W/L | 58% (38/28) |
| 62% (166/101) | Challenger W/L | 60% (70/46) |
| 54% (89/75) | Futures W/L | 61% (11/7) |
| 57% (300/522) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (152/268) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (50/100) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (35/62) |
| 56% (87/155) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (46/86) |
| 90% (278/251) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (156/132) |
| 10% (278/27) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (156/23) |
| 21% (248/52) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (116/22) |
Lamens vs. Krueger Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
