Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Susan Bandecchi vs Flavia Guimaraes Bueno Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bandecchi vs Bueno analysis and find out who is favored!
Susan Bandecchi vs Flavia Guimaraes Bueno Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bandecchi has won 43.99% of points on his second serve, while Bueno has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bandecchi, in recent form, has won 57.12% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bueno has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.92% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bandecchi has saved 52.23% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bueno has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bandecchi has won 46.67% of matches played (W/L 28/ 32), with Bueno winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bandecchi has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 46/ 31), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 5/ 7). Bueno has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 39% (W/L 94/ 147), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 34% (W/L 16/ 31).
- Player level: In the last year, Bandecchi has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48% of matches (W/L 24/ 26), where as Bueno has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Bandecchi winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Bandecchi winning 2 and Bueno winning 0. The last match between Bandecchi and Bueno was at the Hammamet, 25-10-2016, First, Clay with Susan Bandecchi getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:34:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bandecchi and Bueno have played a deciding set 0 times, with Bandecchi winning 0 times and Bueno 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bandecchi winning 0, and Bueno 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bandecchi has played against opponents with an average rank of 326.45 while Bueno has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bandecchi has won 46% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bueno has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bandecchi has converted 45.61% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bueno has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Bandecchi 1 - 0 Bueno
376
Rank
164
High
25
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
734
High
31
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
57% (255-190)
Career Total W/L
38% (110-179)
50% (8-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$93,621
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Susan Bandecchi | Flavia Guimaraes Bueno |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:34:0 | 1:34:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (44/65) | 55% (35/64) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (27/44) | 43% (15/35) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (10/21) | 41% (12/29) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (6/15) | 43% (3/7) |
| Return Points W% | 58% (37/64) | 43% (28/65) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats 
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Flavia Guimaraes Bueno
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Susan Bandecchi | Flavia Guimaraes Bueno |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (8/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 48% (19/21) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (188/182) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.12 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 22 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 33 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:41 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 374.94 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 73% (819/1127) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 59% (483/819) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (135/308) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (71/153) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (543/1155) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (8/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (8/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 63% (5/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (7/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (7/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 22% (9/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Susan Bandecchi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Kayla Day
Player
Susan Bandecchi
72%
(
86 of
120)
1st Serve %
73%
(
88 of
120)
2
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
5
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
50 of
88)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
48%
(
58 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
58 of
120)
120
Total Points Won
120
|
7-6(5) 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Nika Radisic
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Susan Bandecchi
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Panna Udvardy
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
95)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
95)
91
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Julia Avdeeva
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ekaterina Reyngold
Player
Susan Bandecchi
72%
(
65 of
90)
1st Serve %
80%
(
59 of
74)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
37 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Elena Korokozidi
82%
(
77 of
94)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
55%
(
42 of
77)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
47 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
48 of
85)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Leyre Romero Gormaz
Player
Susan Bandecchi
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
80%
(
47 of
59)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Yuliana Monroy
69%
(
70 of
101)
1st Serve %
70%
(
66 of
94)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
40 of
66)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
38%
(
38 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
94)
105
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
view more
Flavia Guimaraes Bueno Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Victoria Bosio
Player
Flavia Guimaraes Bueno
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
82%
(
18 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Flavia Guimaraes Bueno
Player
Paulina Jastrzebska
60%
(
52 of
87)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
9
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
46%
(
40 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
46 of
84)
93
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Barbara Gatica
Player
Flavia Guimaraes Bueno
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
9 of
36)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Flavia Guimaraes Bueno
Player
Kamilla Kokeladze
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
58
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Lara Escauriza
Player
Flavia Guimaraes Bueno
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
51%
(
34 of
67)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Bandecchi Vs Bueno Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
