Sumit Nagal vs Thomas Fabbiano Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nagal vs Fabbiano analysis and find out who is favored!
Sumit Nagal vs Thomas Fabbiano Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nagal has won 55.61% of points on his second serve, while Fabbiano has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nagal, in recent form, has won 54.03% of his opponent's second serve points, while Fabbiano has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.87% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nagal has saved 64.63% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fabbiano has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nagal has won 64.29% of matches played (W/L 54/ 30), with Fabbiano winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nagal has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 214/ 124), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Fabbiano has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 219/ 136), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 45/ 57).
- Player level: In the last year, Nagal has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 68.25% of matches (W/L 43/ 20), where as Fabbiano has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Nagal winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Nagal winning 3 and Fabbiano winning 2. The last match between Nagal and Fabbiano was at the Barcelona Open Banc Sabadell - Barcelona, 18-04-2021, Q3, Clay with Sumit Nagal getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:56:24.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nagal and Fabbiano have played a deciding set 1 times, with Nagal winning 0 times and Fabbiano 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Nagal winning 1, and Fabbiano 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nagal has played against opponents with an average rank of 281.7 while Fabbiano has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nagal has won 46% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fabbiano has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nagal has converted 47.19% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fabbiano has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nagal 1 - 1 Fabbiano
14
Total
0
Mast
5
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
9
Minor
80
Rank
80
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard1
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
673
Rank
70
High
34
Age
R
Plays
18
Total
0
Mast
6
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
12
Minor
Form
61% (317-204)
Career Total W/L
55% (521-428)
64% (18-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$434,190
Career Prize Money
$1,279,588
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Sumit Nagal | Thomas Fabbiano |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
Games Won | 25 | 25 |
Aces (Total) | 5 | 3 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 3 |
Avg Match Time | 1:56:24 | 1:56:24 |
1st Serve % | 69% (107/154) | 64% (100/156) |
1st Serve Win% | 64% (69/107) | 56% (56/100) |
2nd Serve Win% | 43% (20/47) | 59% (33/56) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 47% (8/17) | 60% (9/15) |
Return Points W% | 43% (67/156) | 42% (65/154) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(1) 6-3 |
Sumit Nagal
Player
Thomas Fabbiano
77%
(
53 of
69)
1st Serve %
69%
(
51 of
74)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
4-6 6-4 6-2 |
Thomas Fabbiano
Player
Sumit Nagal
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
76
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Sumit Nagal | Thomas Fabbiano |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 64% (18/10) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 65% (44/24) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 55% (359/288) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 64% (14/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.17 | 0 |
Aces Total | 55 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.12 | 0 |
DFs Total | 38 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:56:56 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 214.64 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 70% (1475/2097) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 67% (992/1475) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 56% (347/622) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 48% (93/193) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 40% (820/2042) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 80% (4/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 75% (9/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (17/26) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 33% (3/9) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 76% (21/16) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 24% (21/5) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 29% (7/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Sumit Nagal Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Holger Rune
Player
Sumit Nagal
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sumit Nagal
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
72%
(
26 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
103
Total Points Won
94
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Sumit Nagal
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
85
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sumit Nagal
Player
Flavio Cobolli
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
24 of
38)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Lorenzo Sonego
Player
Sumit Nagal
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
73%
(
62 of
85)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
22 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
85)
80
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sumit Nagal
Player
Corentin Moutet
74%
(
66 of
89)
1st Serve %
80%
(
53 of
66)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
29 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
21 of
66)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Sumit Nagal
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
70%
(
70 of
100)
16
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
85%
(
51 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
32%
(
11 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
32 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
100)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Milos Raonic
Player
Sumit Nagal
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
9
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Sumit Nagal
59%
(
54 of
92)
1st Serve %
76%
(
65 of
85)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
48 of
65)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
34 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
89
|
2-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sumit Nagal
Player
Stefan Dostanic
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Thomas Fabbiano Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Thomas Fabbiano
47%
(
46 of
97)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
12
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
6
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
51%
(
26 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
32 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
78)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Thomas Fabbiano
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Thomas Fabbiano
Player
Michael Agwi
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
40 of
73)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Arthur Fery
Player
Thomas Fabbiano
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Sam Querrey
Player
Thomas Fabbiano
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
18
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Thomas Fabbiano
Player
Alastair Gray
57%
(
70 of
123)
1st Serve %
56%
(
59 of
105)
2
Aces
17
5
Double Faults
6
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
48 of
59)
53%
(
28 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
38%
(
47 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
34 of
105)
110
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(1) 2-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Daniel Evans
Player
Thomas Fabbiano
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Thomas Fabbiano
Player
Duje Ajdukovic
70%
(
71 of
101)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
103)
8
Aces
14
5
Double Faults
6
79%
(
56 of
71)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
42 of
56)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
29 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
33 of
103)
105
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Matteo Gigante
Player
Thomas Fabbiano
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Thomas Fabbiano
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
76%
(
65 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
58 of
92)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
92)
96
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more