Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sumit Nagal vs James Ward Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nagal vs Ward analysis and find out who is favored!
Sumit Nagal vs James Ward Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nagal has won 55.61% of points on his second serve, while Ward has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nagal, in recent form, has won 54.03% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ward has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.87% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nagal has saved 64.63% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ward has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nagal has won 63.86% of matches played (W/L 53/ 30), with Ward winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nagal has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 214/ 124), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Ward has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 219/ 173), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 46/ 60).
- Player level: In the last year, Nagal has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 67.74% of matches (W/L 42/ 20), where as Ward has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nagal winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nagal winning 2 and Ward winning 0. The last match between Nagal and Ward was at the Bangalore Challenger, 14-11-2018, Second, Hard with Sumit Nagal getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:21:18.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nagal and Ward have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nagal winning 0 times and Ward 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Nagal winning 1, and Ward 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nagal has played against opponents with an average rank of 279.72 while Ward has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nagal has won 46% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ward has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nagal has converted 47.19% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ward has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nagal 1 - 0 Ward
80
Rank
80
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
89
High
37
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
61% (317-204)
Career Total W/L
52% (402-374)
64% (18-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$434,190
Career Prize Money
$460,450
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Sumit Nagal | James Ward |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:21:18 | 1:21:18 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (37/62) | 58% (33/57) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 89% (33/37) | 79% (26/33) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 68% (17/25) | 67% (16/24) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 26% (15/57) | 19% (12/62) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Sumit Nagal
Player
James Ward
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
89%
(
33 of
37)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
12 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
15 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sumit Nagal | James Ward |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (18/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (44/24) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (359/288) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 64% (14/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.17 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 55 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.12 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 38 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:56:56 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 214.64 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (1475/2097) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (992/1475) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 56% (347/622) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (93/193) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (820/2042) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 80% (4/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 75% (9/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (17/26) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (3/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 76% (21/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 24% (21/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (7/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Sumit Nagal Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Sumit Nagal
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
72%
(
26 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
103
Total Points Won
94
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
85
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Flavio Cobolli
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
24 of
38)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lorenzo Sonego
Player
Sumit Nagal
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
73%
(
62 of
85)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
22 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
85)
80
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Corentin Moutet
74%
(
66 of
89)
1st Serve %
80%
(
53 of
66)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
29 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
21 of
66)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Sumit Nagal
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
70%
(
70 of
100)
16
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
85%
(
51 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
32%
(
11 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
32 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
100)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Milos Raonic
Player
Sumit Nagal
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
9
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Sumit Nagal
59%
(
54 of
92)
1st Serve %
76%
(
65 of
85)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
48 of
65)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
34 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
89
|
2-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Stefan Dostanic
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
James Ward Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
James Ward
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Ward
Player
Illya Marchenko
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
17
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
14 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexis Galarneau
Player
James Ward
49%
(
25 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
7-6(1) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vasek Pospisil
Player
James Ward
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
9
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
James Ward
45%
(
33 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
5
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Ward
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
51 of
88)
1st Serve %
58%
(
61 of
106)
9
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
9
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
47 of
61)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
30 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
106)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
6-2 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marius Copil
Player
James Ward
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
11
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
76%
(
22 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
10 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
99)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kevin King
Player
James Ward
51%
(
33 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 2-6 6-3 10-8 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 4-6 7-6(5) 10-7 | H2H | |||
view more
Nagal Vs Ward Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
