C. H. Tseng
To Win
S. Nagal
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L L W L L W WForm
W W L L W L W W W LThey have played 7 sets in total, with Nagal winning 3 and Zeppieri winning 4. The last match between Nagal and Zeppieri was at the Wimbledon - London, 23-06-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Grass, with Giulio Zeppieri getting the victory 6-2 4-6 6-2.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Sumit Nagal | 1 |
Giulio Zeppieri | 2 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Wimbledon - London(23-06-2025)
Nagal | Stats | Zeppieri |
---|---|---|
43% (13-17) | YTD Win/Loss | 59% (20-14) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
296 | Ranking | 351 |
68 | Highest Rank | 110 |
27 | Age | 23 |
R | Plays | L |
15 | Titles | 3 |
59% (344-240) | Career Total W/L | 55% (177-144) |
$577,520 | Career Prize Money | $843,980 |
1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
0 | Grass H2H | 1 |
09 Jul 2025 / First
09 Jul 2025 / First
Wimbledon - London atp
11 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
Wimbledon - London atp
09 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 4-6 6-2 |
![]() ![]()
Giulio Zeppieri
Player
Sumit Nagal
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
6-4 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Sumit Nagal
Player
Giulio Zeppieri
84%
(
49 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
6-1 7-5 |
![]() ![]()
Giulio Zeppieri
Player
Sumit Nagal
45%
(
30 of
66)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 2 |
3 | Sets Won | 4 |
28 | Games Won | 37 |
3 | Aces (Total) | 13 |
8 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
1:36:28 | Average Match Time | 1:36:28 |
64% (130/204) | 1st Serve % | 59% (118/199) |
68% (88/130) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (87/118) |
42% (31/74) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (44/81) |
43% (6/14) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (10/24) |
34% (68/199) | Return Points Win % | 42% (85/204) |
33% (1/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) |
0% (2/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Both players have shown strengths and have an even head-to-head record, but their performance trends suggest a nuanced battle.
Nagal demonstrates a stronger return game and performs slightly better on clay, suggesting a strategic advantage in their match dynamics. However, Zeppieri's performance under pressure and overall winning percentage in the last year presents a case for competitiveness.
The match might hinge on how well each player can leverage their service games and withstand pressure situations. The converting of breakpoints will be a critical factor.
In conclusion, factoring in their recent form and performance on their favored surfaces, Nagal may have a slight edge and is the probable winner for the upcoming match, albeit a closely contested one.
Nagal vs Zeppieri Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Sumit Nagal
Player
Neil Oberleitner
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Sumit Nagal
Player
Luca Castagnola
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Giulio Zeppieri
Player
Sumit Nagal
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Cristian Garin
Player
Sumit Nagal
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve %
70%
(
65 of
93)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
93)
87
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Sumit Nagal
Player
Alan Wazny
73%
(
74 of
102)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
101)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
54%
(
40 of
74)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
47%
(
9 of
19)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
50%
(
51 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
56 of
101)
107
Total Points Won
96
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Sumit Nagal
55%
(
42 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
55 of
81)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
33 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
82
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
Player
Sumit Nagal
49%
(
53 of
108)
1st Serve %
57%
(
58 of
101)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
56%
(
31 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
46 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
101)
111
Total Points Won
98
|
7-5 6-7(2) 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Sumit Nagal
Player
Tom Gentzsch
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
1
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Giulio Zeppieri
59%
(
100 of
170)
1st Serve %
56%
(
79 of
140)
5
Aces
22
5
Double Faults
7
75%
(
75 of
100)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
63 of
79)
51%
(
36 of
70)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
35%
(
59 of
170)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
43 of
140)
154
Total Points Won
156
|
2-6 3-6 6-3 7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Giulio Zeppieri
Player
Cristian Garin
64%
(
95 of
148)
1st Serve %
71%
(
108 of
152)
18
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
66 of
95)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
77 of
108)
49%
(
26 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
38%
(
56 of
148)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
57 of
152)
149
Total Points Won
151
|
1-6 6-2 6-4 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
![]() ![]()
Giulio Zeppieri
Player
Paul Jubb
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Giulio Zeppieri
Player
Sumit Nagal
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
Player
Giulio Zeppieri
68%
(
79 of
116)
1st Serve %
62%
(
68 of
109)
2
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
7
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
54 of
68)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
39 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
37 of
109)
114
Total Points Won
111
|
6-7(1) 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Giulio Zeppieri
Player
Stefano Napolitano
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
56%
(
22 of
39)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
55
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Elias Ymer
Player
Giulio Zeppieri
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
2
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
0
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Giulio Zeppieri
66%
(
57 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
3
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
0
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
25 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
98
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 6-4 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
59% (344/240) | Win/Loss | 55% (177/144) |
58% (786/576) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (425/349) |
53% (6662/5875) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (3854/3524) |
57% (98/75) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (19/14) |
62% (237/146) | Clay Win/Loss | 56% (126/98) |
36% (9/16) | Indoor Hard W/L | 49% (28/29) |
0% (0/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) |
0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.45 |
798 | Aces Total | 1613 |
0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
1258 | Total Double Faults | 714 |
1:33:4 | Average Match Time | 1:38:42 |
477.02 | Average Opponent Rank | 377.93 |
68% (24339/36032) | 1st Serve % | 62% (14258/22969) |
64% (15625/24339) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (10089/14258) |
50% (5882/11679) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (4519/8711) |
44% (1893/4297) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (854/1971) |
43% (15860/37015) | Return Points Win % | 37% (8356/22368) |
33% (10/20) | Slam W/L | 68% (25/12) |
36% (5/9) | Masters W/L | 50% (9/9) |
50% (4/4) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
43% (25/33) | Main Tour W/L | 42% (14/19) |
58% (182/133) | Challenger W/L | 54% (110/93) |
75% (117/39) | Futures W/L | 63% (19/11) |
60% (335/561) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (171/306) |
25% (4/16) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 40% (4/10) |
58% (85/147) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (50/100) |
48% (88/182) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (55/120) |
85% (359/304) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 78% (183/142) |
15% (359/53) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 22% (183/40) |
18% (225/40) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (137/35) |