Sumit Nagal vs Ernests Gulbis Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nagal vs Gulbis analysis and find out who is favored!
Sumit Nagal vs Ernests Gulbis Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nagal has won 55.61% of points on his second serve, while Gulbis has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nagal, in recent form, has won 54.03% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gulbis has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.87% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nagal has saved 64.63% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gulbis has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nagal has won 63.86% of matches played (W/L 53/ 30), with Gulbis winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nagal has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 214/ 124), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Gulbis has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 123/ 85), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 45% (W/L 22/ 27).
- Player level: In the last year, Nagal has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 67.74% of matches (W/L 42/ 20), where as Gulbis has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nagal has played against opponents with an average rank of 279.72 while Gulbis has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nagal has won 46% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gulbis has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nagal has converted 47.19% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gulbis has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nagal 0 - 0 Gulbis
14
Total
0
Mast
5
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
9
Minor
80
Rank
80
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
893
Rank
10
High
35
Age
R
Plays
16
Total
0
Mast
5
Chall
0
Slam
6
Main
5
Minor
Form
61% (317-204)
Career Total W/L
55% (487-401)
64% (18-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$434,190
Career Prize Money
$4,263,485
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Sumit Nagal | Ernests Gulbis |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 64% (18/10) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 65% (44/24) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 55% (359/288) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 64% (14/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.17 | 0 |
Aces Total | 55 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.12 | 0 |
DFs Total | 38 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:56:56 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 214.64 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 70% (1475/2097) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 67% (992/1475) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 56% (347/622) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 48% (93/193) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 40% (820/2042) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 80% (4/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 75% (9/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (17/26) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 33% (3/9) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 76% (21/16) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 24% (21/5) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 29% (7/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Sumit Nagal Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Holger Rune
Player
Sumit Nagal
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sumit Nagal
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
72%
(
26 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
103
Total Points Won
94
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Sumit Nagal
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
85
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sumit Nagal
Player
Flavio Cobolli
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
24 of
38)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Lorenzo Sonego
Player
Sumit Nagal
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
73%
(
62 of
85)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
22 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
85)
80
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sumit Nagal
Player
Corentin Moutet
74%
(
66 of
89)
1st Serve %
80%
(
53 of
66)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
29 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
21 of
66)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Sumit Nagal
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
70%
(
70 of
100)
16
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
85%
(
51 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
32%
(
11 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
32 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
100)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Milos Raonic
Player
Sumit Nagal
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
9
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Sumit Nagal
59%
(
54 of
92)
1st Serve %
76%
(
65 of
85)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
48 of
65)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
34 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
89
|
2-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sumit Nagal
Player
Stefan Dostanic
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Ernests Gulbis Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rubber 2 |
Ernests Gulbis
Player
Daniel Cukierman
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
89)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
6-1 2-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Gauthier Onclin
Player
Ernests Gulbis
56%
(
56 of
100)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
93)
7
Aces
14
1
Double Faults
6
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
46 of
58)
59%
(
26 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
32 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(6) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ernests Gulbis
Player
Lukas Klein
48%
(
30 of
62)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tibo Colson
Player
Ernests Gulbis
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
47%
(
15 of
32)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
43
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Ernests Gulbis
Player
Charles Broom
48%
(
48 of
100)
1st Serve %
59%
(
57 of
96)
4
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
6
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
52%
(
27 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
47%
(
47 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
94
Total Points Won
102
|
1-6 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alexander Shevchenko
Player
Ernests Gulbis
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
21 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ernests Gulbis
Player
Christian Harrison
55%
(
44 of
80)
1st Serve %
78%
(
62 of
79)
3
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
5
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
36%
(
13 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Ernests Gulbis
Player
Gabriel Decamps
54%
(
13 of
24)
1st Serve %
57%
(
8 of
14)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
9 of
13)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
42%
(
10 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
86%
(
12 of
14)
26
Total Points Won
12
|
6-1 0-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mate Valkusz
Player
Ernests Gulbis
48%
(
21 of
44)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
75)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Ugo Humbert
Player
Ernests Gulbis
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more