Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Stuart Parker vs Ryan Nijboer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Parker vs Nijboer analysis and find out who is favored!
Stuart Parker vs Ryan Nijboer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Parker has won 51.08% of points on his second serve, while Nijboer has won 48.7%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Parker, in recent form, has won 53.6% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nijboer has won 53.6%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.07% and 34.81% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Parker has saved 56.41% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nijboer has saved 56.02% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Parker has won 62.96% of matches played (W/L 34/ 20), with Nijboer winning 62.22% (W/L 56/ 34) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Parker has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 121/ 54), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 8/ 11). Nijboer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 93/ 64), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 24% (W/L 4/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Parker has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.44% of matches (W/L 29/ 16), where as Nijboer has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.49% of matches (W/L 50/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Parker winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Parker winning 2 and Nijboer winning 0. The last match between Parker and Nijboer was at the M25 Meitar, 02-11-2021, First, Hard with Stuart Parker getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:15:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Parker and Nijboer have played a deciding set 0 times, with Parker winning 0 times and Nijboer 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Parker winning 0, and Nijboer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Parker has played against opponents with an average rank of 183.57 while Nijboer has played against players with an average rank of 157.73.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Parker has won 45% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nijboer has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Parker has converted 48.3% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nijboer has converted 45.31% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Parker 1 - 0 Nijboer
677
Rank
346
High
26
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
484
Rank
437
High
24
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
64% (174-96)
Career Total W/L
56% (212-164)
80% (16-4)
YTD W/L
50% (10-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$5,735
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Stuart Parker | Ryan Nijboer |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 10 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:15:0 | 1:15:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (37/52) | 79% (50/63) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 81% (30/37) | 52% (26/50) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 40% (6/15) | 38% (5/13) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (32/63) | 31% (16/52) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Stuart Parker
Player
Ryan Nijboer
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
79%
(
50 of
63)
10
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
0
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Stuart Parker | Ryan Nijboer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 80% (16/4) | 50% (10/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 78% (32/9) | 53% (25/22) |
| Games Win/Loss | 59% (240/168) | 53% (239/213) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 75% (12/4) | 73% (8/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (4/0) | 0% (0/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.26 | 0.47 |
| Aces Total | 52 | 102 |
| DFs per game | 0.11 | 0.38 |
| DFs Total | 21 | 83 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:18:42 | 1:53:25 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 182.25 | 228.05 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (693/1024) | 57% (798/1390) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (488/693) | 71% (565/798) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (172/331) | 50% (296/592) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (57/120) | 44% (71/160) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (475/1077) | 42% (606/1453) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 100% (4/0) | 17% (1/5) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (12/4) | 64% (9/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 80% (16/20) | 50% (10/20) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 86% (6/7) | 29% (2/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 29% (2/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (15/15) | 73% (11/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (15/0) | 27% (11/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (5/1) | 22% (9/2) |
Stuart Parker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Lukas Pokorny
Player
Stuart Parker
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Moerani Bouzige
76%
(
63 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
77
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Max Wiskandt
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
30 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Max Stenzer
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Kyle Edmund
70%
(
57 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
94)
16
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
91%
(
52 of
57)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
40 of
53)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
17 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
31 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Filip Peliwo
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
75)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
53 of
79)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Hynek Barton
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Ryan Nijboer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Ryan Nijboer
46%
(
53 of
116)
1st Serve %
65%
(
61 of
94)
6
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
54%
(
34 of
63)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
36%
(
42 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
94)
109
Total Points Won
101
|
6-7(5) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Ryan Nijboer
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve %
75%
(
57 of
76)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
76)
85
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Robert Strombachs
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marko Topo
Player
Ryan Nijboer
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Ryan Nijboer
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Dali Blanch
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Ryan Nijboer
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
102)
2
Aces
13
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
45 of
61)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
39%
(
32 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
102)
92
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Ryan Nijboer
55%
(
58 of
106)
1st Serve %
50%
(
55 of
109)
5
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
4
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
52%
(
25 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
34 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
35 of
109)
107
Total Points Won
108
|
4-6 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Georgii Kravchenko
Player
Ryan Nijboer
70%
(
51 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
3
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Karl Friberg
49%
(
23 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Parker Vs Nijboer Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Stuart Parker
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Ryan Nijboer
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
