Stuart Parker vs Max Wiskandt Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W W W W L L
Form
W W L W W L W L W LHead-to-head: Parker 3 - 1 Wiskandt
They have played 9 sets in total, with Parker winning 6 and Wiskandt winning 3. The last match between Parker and Wiskandt was at the Glasgow Challenger, 17-02-2025, Q3, I.hard with Stuart Parker getting the victory 2-6 6-4 6-4.
Glasgow Challenger(17-02-2025)
2
6
6
4
6
4
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Andreeva PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells wta
15 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Draper VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
15 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Stuart Parker
Player
Max Wiskandt
67%
(
56 of
83)
1st Serve %
64%
(
66 of
103)
9
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
30 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
40 of
103)
93
Total Points Won
93
|
||||
| 7-5 6-2 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Max Wiskandt
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| 6-3 6-0 |
Stats
Max Wiskandt
Player
Stuart Parker
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve %
75%
(
42 of
56)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
| 7-5 6-1 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Max Wiskandt
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
Stats
3
H2H Matches
1
6
Sets Won
3
43
Games Won
39
14
Aces (Total)
10
6
Total Double Faults
9
1:42:21
Average Match Time
1:42:21
70% (188/268)
1st Serve %
69% (191/276)
60% (112/188)
1st Serve Win %
62% (118/191)
54% (43/80)
2nd Serve Win %
41% (35/85)
45% (14/31)
Break Points Won % (Total)
50% (11/22)
45% (123/276)
Return Points Win %
42% (113/268)
75% (3/4)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
25% (1/4)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/1)
100% (2/2)
1st Set Won, Won Match
50% (2/1)
0% (2/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
50% (2/1)
50% (2/1)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (2/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Stuart Parker vs Max Wiskandt Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Stuart Parker 3 - 1 Max Wiskandt
Recent form analysis suggests that the performance of the players on their second serves will play a crucial role in predicting the outcome of the upcoming tennis match. In the last six months, Parker has won 48.57% of points on their second serve, while Wiskandt has a slightly higher success rate of 51.21%. It is important to note that there is a strong correlation between this statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
Another significant factor to consider is the return game performance of the players in recent form. Parker has won 49.11% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Wiskandt has a success rate of 51.08% in this aspect. The first serve return stats also provide valuable insights, with Parker winning 32.16% and Wiskandt winning 32.09% respectively. These statistics significantly influence the predictions for the head-to-head matchup.
When it comes to handling pressure situations, Parker has demonstrated the ability to save 57.69% of breakpoints in recent form. On the other hand, Wiskandt has proven to be slightly better in this regard, saving 61.54% of breakpoints. This statistical analysis is particularly useful for in-game betting predictions.
Taking into account the overall performance of the players in the past year, Parker has won 58.82% of matches played (with a win/loss record of 30/21), while Wiskandt has a slightly better record of 62.2% wins (with a win/loss record of 51/31). These numbers provide an insightful overview for predicting the head-to-head outcome.
Considering the preferred playing surfaces for each player, it is noteworthy that Parker has achieved their highest career win percentage on hard courts, winning 69% of matches (with a win/loss record of 138/63). Their least favorable surface is grass, where they have a win percentage of 38% (with a win/loss record of 8/13). In contrast, Wiskandt excels on hard courts, boasting a career win percentage of 66% (with a win/loss record of 81/42). However, their weaker surface is clay, with a win percentage of 45% (with a win/loss record of 27/33).
Examining the level of play, it is observed that Parker has primarily competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a $10K prize money, winning 63.41% of matches (with a win/loss record of 26/15). Similarly, Wiskandt has participated mainly in the same level of tournaments, winning 64.81% of matches (with a win/loss record of 35/19). When analyzing the statistics between the players to predict the favored player, it is essential to consider the relative event level at which they have competed.
The head-to-head matches between Parker and Wiskandt provide valuable insights as well. They have faced each other three times, with Parker emerging victorious twice and Wiskandt winning on one occasion. Overall, they have competed in six sets, with Parker winning four and Wiskandt winning two. Their most recent encounter took place at the M15 Monastir on 05-05-2024 in the final, played on a hard court. Stuart Parker triumphed in this match with a scoreline of 7-5, 6-2.
Previous head-to-head matches indicate that the average match duration between these players is 1 hour, 34 minutes, and 20 seconds. This information can prove helpful for predicting the outcome of the match if it reaches a deciding set.
In terms of deciding set performance, Parker and Wiskandt have had no matches that required a decisive set. Thus, there is no data available regarding their success in such situations. However, if this match were to go the distance, analyzing their performance in previous deciding sets would provide valuable insights.
The head-to-head encounters between Parker and Wiskandt have not witnessed any tiebreaks. Neither player has won a tiebreak against the other. This information is crucial in predicting the outcome of tiebreak situations in their upcoming match.
Considering the quality of opponents faced by the players, Parker has competed against players with an average rank of 360.12 in the last 12 months. In comparison, Wiskandt has encountered opponents with an average rank of 413.79. These opponent quality statistics provide further context for assessing the players' performances.
In matches that have reached a deciding set over the last 12 months, Parker has emerged victorious in 67% of cases, highlighting their ability to perform well under pressure. On the other hand, Wiskandt has won 59% of deciding sets in all matches played on the tour. This information is particularly valuable for live predictions and betting.
While past player performance is a significant factor in predicting tennis matches, it is also essential to consider current event stats during an ongoing tournament. These stats give an indication of a player's current form and performance levels. Further information regarding the current event stats for the players can be found in the section below (if they have already played a match in the current event). Additionally, it is important to note that certain players may excel at specific events, and this can influence outcome predictions.
Breakpoint conversion rates are crucial in determining in-game live betting tips. In recent form, Parker has converted 39.33% of their breakpoint opportunities, whereas Wiskandt has capitalized on 44.25% of their chances to break their opponents' serves. These statistics can provide valuable insights when a player has a breakpoint opportunity.
For those interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article serves as a good starting point. However, it is worth noting that it caters specifically to statistics enthusiasts.
Stuart Parker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Stuart Parker
70%
(
64 of
92)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
102)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
102)
106
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Edas Butvilas
Player
Stuart Parker
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Ryan Peniston
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Dimitar Kuzmanov
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
9
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Chris Rodesch
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo
57%
(
55 of
97)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
93
|
7-5 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Alexandr Binda
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
11
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Christos Glavas
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Stuart Parker
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
53%
(
38 of
72)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Max Wiskandt
67%
(
56 of
83)
1st Serve %
64%
(
66 of
103)
9
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
30 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
40 of
103)
93
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Max Wiskandt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Lorenzo Rottoli
Player
Max Wiskandt
52%
(
50 of
97)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
6
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
5
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
47%
(
22 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
38 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
94
Total Points Won
82
|
6-7(4) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Wiskandt
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
7
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
3
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Max Wiskandt
67%
(
56 of
83)
1st Serve %
64%
(
66 of
103)
9
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
30 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
40 of
103)
93
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Max Wiskandt
Player
Keegan Smith
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Arthur Fery
Player
Max Wiskandt
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Max Wiskandt
Player
Henry Searle
72%
(
71 of
99)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
96)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
42 of
60)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
32 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
31 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Wiskandt
Player
Marcus Walters
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
85)
9
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
42 of
60)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
85)
82
Total Points Won
85
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Abedallah Shelbayh
Player
Max Wiskandt
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
90)
92
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Max Wiskandt
Player
Dimitar Kuzmanov
65%
(
72 of
110)
1st Serve %
80%
(
76 of
95)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
53 of
76)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
40 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
102
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Max Wiskandt
Player
Michael Vrbensky
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
63% (207/119)
Win/Loss
56% (134/105)
61% (440/287)
Sets Win/Loss
56% (308/240)
54% (3696/3165)
Games Win/Loss
53% (2821/2488)
69% (144/65)
Hard Win/Loss
66% (81/42)
55% (18/15)
Clay Win/Loss
45% (27/33)
59% (37/26)
Indoor Hard W/L
46% (26/30)
38% (8/13)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.39
Aces Per Game
0.22
1317
Aces Total
573
0.17
Double Faults Per Game
0.24
568
Total Double Faults
634
1:33:27
Average Match Time
1:17:24
429.91
Average Opponent Rank
398.65
66% (12961/19639)
1st Serve %
64% (7990/12410)
68% (8811/12961)
1st Serve Win %
67% (5360/7990)
51% (3421/6677)
2nd Serve Win %
49% (2155/4420)
42% (887/2091)
Break Points Won % (Total)
45% (538/1186)
41% (8201/20071)
Return Points Win %
41% (4988/12220)
0% (0/4)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
59% (34/24)
Challenger W/L
47% (16/18)
66% (173/90)
Futures W/L
58% (118/87)
63% (201/317)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
57% (134/237)
100% (1/1)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
56% (49/87)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
44% (30/68)
59% (50/85)
Deciding Set Win %
44% (31/70)
91% (190/172)
1st Set Won, Won Match
85% (143/121)
9% (190/17)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
15% (143/21)
22% (134/30)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
14% (96/13)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
