G. Gruenig
To Win
I. Kudriashov
To Win
Stuart Parker vs Gian Gruenig Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W L L L L
Form
L W L W L W W L L WHead-To-Head: Parker 1 - 0 Gruenig
They have played 3 sets in total, with Parker winning 2 and Gruenig winning 1. The last match between Parker and Gruenig was at the M15 Heraklion, 28-03-2025, Round: Quarterfinals, Surface: Hard, with Stuart Parker getting the victory 1-6 6-1 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Stuart Parker | 1 |
| Gian Gruenig | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M15 Heraklion(28-03-2025)
Stuart Parker
Gian Gruenig
1
6
6
1
6
4
| Parker | Stats | Gruenig |
|---|---|---|
| 65% (20-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 54% (13-11) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 471 | Ranking | N/A |
| 346 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 27 | Age | 25 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 6 | Titles | 0 |
| 64% (217-124) | Career Total W/L | 55% (28-23) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
22 May 2025 / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Khachanov VS Ofner PREDICTION Clay
Gonet Geneva Open - Geneva atp
22 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Basilashvili VS Vacherot PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris atp
21 May 2025 / Q2 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-6 6-1 6-4 |
Stats 
Stuart Parker
Player
Gian Gruenig
58%
(
45 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
1
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
6
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
86)
81
Total Points Won
82
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 13 | Games Won | 11 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 2:4:55 | Average Match Time | 2:4:55 |
| 58% (45/77) | 1st Serve % | 63% (54/86) |
| 67% (30/45) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (35/54) |
| 47% (15/32) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (15/32) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (3/6) |
| 42% (36/86) | Return Points Win % | 42% (32/77) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Parker vs Gruenig Match Preview :
When evaluating the performance of Gruenig and Parker in their recent matches, Parker appears stronger in several key statistics. Parker has a superior second serve performance, winning 46.6% of points on their second serve compared to Gruenig's 36.59%. This particular stat often correlates closely with accurate match predictions between players. Furthermore, Parker shows greater proficiency in converting breakpoints, with a conversion rate of 33.33% compared to Gruenig's 27.27%.
In scenarios where the match goes to a deciding set, Parker maintains an edge by winning 67% of such scenarios over the past year, whereas Gruenig has only secured success 20% of the time. Additionally, both players have displayed comparable tendencies in return game performance. Gruenig has an edge in returning first serves, winning 34.97%, but Parker excels in second serve returns, winning 44.42% of those points, slightly higher than Gruenig’s 43.37%.
Their ability to handle pressure and save breakpoints is also noteworthy. Gruenig has successfully saved 56.25% of breakpoints, slightly ahead of Parker who has saved 53.95%. However, when evaluating overall match win percentages over the last year, both players are closely matched with Gruenig winning 60.87% and Parker with a slightly higher 61.54% win rate.
Surface performance also provides valuable insights. Both performers show their highest career win percentages on hard courts, with Parker winning at 69% and Gruenig at 67%. Gruenig’s performance on an indoor hard surface stands at 0%, which could be a disadvantage, while Parker’s weakest surface is grass with a 38% win rate.
In terms of the level of opposition faced, Gruenig has played against stronger opponents with an average rank of 192.57 compared to Parker's 334.55. The context of these statistics is crucial, especially considering the level of tournaments each player has participated in. Most of their encounters have been in the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, with Parker securing a marginally superior win rate of 64.44% compared to Gruenig’s 63.64%.
Taking into consideration all these factors, Parker demonstrates a slight advantage in this head-to-head match-up. With higher statistics in second serve points, break point conversions, and deciding set outcomes, Parker is statistically predicted to likely emerge victorious in this upcoming tennis match.
Parker vs Gruenig Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Stuart Parker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Semen Pankin
Player
Stuart Parker
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
4
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
5
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
24 of
29)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Stuart Parker
70%
(
52 of
74)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
12
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
6
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
44 of
52)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
21 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
82)
81
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aidan Mchugh
Player
Stuart Parker
85%
(
11 of
13)
1st Serve %
58%
(
21 of
36)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
91%
(
10 of
11)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
100%
(
2 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
8%
(
1 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
35
Total Points Won
14
|
6-0 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Stuart Parker
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
56 of
95)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
91
Total Points Won
80
|
2-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Olaf Pieczkowski
54%
(
45 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Robert Guna
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Guillaume Dalmasso
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Dmitry Kopilevich
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
33%
(
13 of
39)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Gian Gruenig Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gian Gruenig
Player
Maan Kesarwani
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
12
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
1
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Rafael De Alba
Player
Gian Gruenig
80%
(
49 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Luke Hooper
Player
Gian Gruenig
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 4-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gian Gruenig
Player
Matthew Hulme
57%
(
51 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
4
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
64%
(
25 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
30 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
22 of
79)
82
Total Points Won
87
|
5-7 7-6(5) 11-9 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (217/124) | Win/Loss | 55% (28/23) |
| 61% (461/299) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (64/49) |
| 54% (3853/3272) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (577/489) |
| 69% (154/70) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (13/9) |
| 55% (18/15) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (15/10) |
| 59% (37/26) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/4) |
| 38% (8/13) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.39 | Aces Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1362 | Aces Total | 97 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
| 605 | Total Double Faults | 56 |
| 1:33:20 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 428.21 | Average Opponent Rank | 207.22 |
| 66% (13448/20477) | 1st Serve % | 60% (907/1519) |
| 68% (9164/13448) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (638/907) |
| 51% (3595/7028) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (314/612) |
| 43% (940/2192) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (70/163) |
| 41% (8576/20906) | Return Points Win % | 41% (663/1601) |
| 0% (0/4) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 58% (34/25) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 66% (183/94) | Futures W/L | 56% (28/22) |
| 64% (211/332) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (28/51) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (49/88) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 36% (4/11) |
| 59% (52/88) | Deciding Set Win % | 27% (3/11) |
| 90% (199/180) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (30/26) |
| 9% (199/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (30/4) |
| 23% (140/32) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (21/2) |
Parker vs. Gruenig Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
