G. Gruenig
To Win
S. Parker
To Win
Stuart Parker vs Daniel Evans Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L L W L W W
Form
L L L L W L W L L LHead-To-Head: Parker 0 - 1 Evans
They have played 2 sets in total, with Parker winning 0 and Evans winning 2. The last match between Parker and Evans was at the Glasgow Challenger, 18-02-2025, First, I.hard with Daniel Evans getting the victory 6-3 7-6(5).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Stuart Parker | 0 |
| Daniel Evans | 1 |
Glasgow Challenger(18-02-2025)
6
3
7
6
| Parker | Stats | Evans |
|---|---|---|
| 65% (13-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 27% (3-8) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 464 | Ranking | 183 |
| 346 | Highest Rank | 21 |
| 27 | Age | 34 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 5 | Titles | 24 |
| 64% (210-120) | Career Total W/L | 59% (570-394) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $4,992,575 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
28 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Pegula PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
28 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Mensik VS Fritz PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
29 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Daniel Evans
Player
Stuart Parker
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
53%
(
38 of
72)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 9 | Games Won | 13 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:58:5 | Average Match Time | 1:58:5 |
| 53% (38/72) | 1st Serve % | 61% (44/72) |
| 74% (28/38) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (31/44) |
| 50% (17/34) | 2nd Serve Win % | 68% (19/28) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 17% (1/6) |
| 31% (22/72) | Return Points Win % | 38% (27/72) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Stuart Parker vs Daniel Evans Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Stuart Parker 0 - 1 Daniel Evans
- In terms of recent performance, it is worth noting that Parker and Evans have exhibited fairly comparable second serve success rates over the past six months. Specifically, Parker has achieved a 48.55% win rate on their second serve, while Evans has achieved a slightly higher rate of 49.02%. It is important to acknowledge the significant correlation between this particular statistical aspect and the accuracy of match predictions.
- A closer examination of return game statistics reveals that Parker's recent form has shown a strong ability to win 49.08% of their opponent's second serve points. On the other hand, Evans has achieved a slightly lower success rate of 48.08% in this aspect. Furthermore, the statistics for first serve returns also provide valuable insights, with Parker achieving a rate of 32.23% and Evans achieving 30.39% respectively. These return game stats hold a high correlation to determine the favored player in their upcoming head-to-head matchup.
- When it comes to handling pressure situations, Parker has proven to be slightly more adept at saving breakpoints in recent form. They have successfully saved 57.23% of breakpoints, while Evans has managed to save 55.77%. This particular statistic holds significant relevance for betting predictions during the course of the match.
- Examining the overall performance over the past year, it is evident that Parker has achieved a satisfactory win rate of 59.62% in matches played (with a win-loss record of 31/21). Meanwhile, Evans has achieved a relatively lower win rate of 40.43% (with a win-loss record of 19/28). Taking these numbers into account, we can derive an overall prediction for their head-to-head matchup.
- Considering the players' performance on different surfaces, Parker's strongest career win percentage lies on Hard courts, where they have won 69% of matches (with a win-loss record of 138/63). In contrast, their weakest performance is on Grass courts, with a win percentage of only 38% (with a win-loss record of 8/13). On the other hand, Evans performs best on Indoor Hard courts, winning 62% of matches (with a win-loss record of 168/103). However, their performance on Clay courts is comparatively weaker, with a win percentage of 46% (with a win-loss record of 48/56).
- In terms of player level, Parker has predominantly participated in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments ($10K level) over the past year, achieving a commendable 63.41% win rate (with a win-loss record of 26/15). In contrast, Evans has participated more frequently in the Challengers/ITF tournaments above the $10K level, achieving a slightly lower win rate of 53.33% (with a win-loss record of 8/7). When comparing these statistics to predict the favored player, it is crucial to consider the level of events at which they have been competing.
- Shifting our focus to the opponent quality, it is noteworthy that Parker has faced opponents with an average rank of 364.38 over the last 12 months, while Evans has encountered opponents with an average rank of 141.06. These opponent quality statistics provide additional context for predicting their upcoming match.
- In the event that the match progresses to a deciding set, it is intriguing to observe that Parker has emerged victorious in 69% of the deciding sets played over the past 12 months. On the other hand, Evans has won 44% of deciding sets in all matches played on the tour. This data becomes particularly pertinent for live predictions and betting.
- While past player performance is undoubtedly valuable in predicting tennis matches, it is equally important to consider the current event statistics of in-form players. Accordingly, it is advisable to refer to the section below for a comprehensive analysis of their performances in the current event. Additionally, it is worth noting that certain players tend to excel at specific events, which should be taken into consideration when making predictions.
- An additional crucial aspect to consider is the conversion rate for breakpoints. Parker has been successful in converting 38.36% of their breakpoint opportunities, while Evans has achieved a slightly lower conversion rate of 37.87% in breaking their opponents' serve. This particular statistic serves as a valuable indicator for in-game live betting tips whenever either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in delving deeper into models that predict tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point. However, it is essential to note that the content may be more suitable for those with a strong penchant for statistics.
Stuart Parker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Oliver Bonding
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Dmitry Kopilevich
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chris Rodesch
Player
Stuart Parker
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Kirill Kivattsev
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Stuart Parker
70%
(
64 of
92)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
102)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
102)
106
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Edas Butvilas
Player
Stuart Parker
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Ryan Peniston
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Dimitar Kuzmanov
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
9
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Chris Rodesch
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo
57%
(
55 of
97)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
93
|
7-5 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Evans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Pellegrino
Player
Daniel Evans
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
99)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
35 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
99)
91
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karen Khachanov
Player
Daniel Evans
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Rincon
Player
Daniel Evans
61%
(
60 of
98)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
7
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
37%
(
14 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
40 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(7) 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Stuart Parker
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
53%
(
38 of
72)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Daniel Evans
69%
(
83 of
120)
1st Serve %
60%
(
63 of
105)
9
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
40%
(
48 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
105)
116
Total Points Won
109
|
4-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Benoit Paire
64%
(
67 of
104)
1st Serve %
48%
(
45 of
93)
6
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
9
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
35 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
106
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Daniel Evans
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
12 of
17)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
11 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
14 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Daniel Evans
46%
(
44 of
95)
1st Serve %
52%
(
45 of
86)
7
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
55%
(
28 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
95
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Daniel Evans
57%
(
53 of
93)
1st Serve %
66%
(
69 of
105)
12
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
47 of
69)
58%
(
23 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
35 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
105)
102
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Daniel Evans
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (210/120) | Win/Loss | 59% (570/394) |
| 61% (446/289) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (1352/1020) |
| 54% (3738/3186) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (11956/10897) |
| 69% (147/66) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (248/157) |
| 55% (18/15) | Clay Win/Loss | 46% (48/57) |
| 59% (37/26) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62% (181/113) |
| 38% (8/13) | Grass Win/Loss | 58% (93/67) |
| 0.39 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
| 1325 | Aces Total | 2698 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 573 | Total Double Faults | 1906 |
| 1:33:17 | Average Match Time | 1:6:48 |
| 426.59 | Average Opponent Rank | 480.54 |
| 66% (13059/19813) | 1st Serve % | 61% (29068/47576) |
| 68% (8887/13059) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (20641/29068) |
| 51% (3465/6753) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (9401/18507) |
| 42% (902/2124) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1787/4370) |
| 41% (8302/20278) | Return Points Win % | 38% (18214/47704) |
| 0% (0/4) | Slam W/L | 52% (46/42) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 42% (33/46) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 43% (20/26) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 52% (105/98) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (34/24) | Challenger W/L | 62% (160/97) |
| 66% (176/91) | Futures W/L | 71% (205/84) |
| 64% (204/321) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (527/870) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 46% (39/84) |
| 56% (49/87) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (188/353) |
| 59% (50/85) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (176/327) |
| 91% (193/175) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (563/476) |
| 9% (193/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (563/84) |
| 22% (135/30) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (400/95) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Stuart Parker
View full predicted draw for Parker
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
