Prediction of Strong Kirchheimer vs Reese Stalder Head-to-Head, Best Odds & Picks At Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
Head-To-Head
2 - 0
55% (295-237)
Career Total W/L
56% (73-58)
60% (3-2)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
$8,150
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Kirchheimer VS Stalder H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Reese Stalder
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
| 7-6(4) 7-6(3) |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Reese Stalder
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
85)
19
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
85%
(
46 of
54)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
25 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
27 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
83
|
||||
Kirchheimer VS Stalder H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Strong Kirchheimer | Reese Stalder |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 26 | 19 |
| Aces (Total) | 27 | 9 |
| Total Double Faults | 4 | 7 |
| Average Match Time | 1:49:16 | 1:49:16 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (96/152) | 60% (84/141) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 76% (73/96) | 69% (58/84) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (29/56) | 54% (31/57) |
| Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 50% (2/4) |
| Return Points Win % | 37% (52/141) | 33% (50/152) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Strong Kirchheimer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Raul Garcia
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Dorian Tremblay
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Theo Papamalamis
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
77%
(
33 of
43)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Nicolas Arseneault
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
52%
(
44 of
85)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
85)
86
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Aidan Kim
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
0
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Kiranpal Pannu
63%
(
66 of
105)
1st Serve %
58%
(
63 of
108)
6
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
63)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
38 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
108)
116
Total Points Won
97
|
6-0 5-7 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Brady
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
64%
(
72 of
113)
1st Serve %
68%
(
66 of
97)
1
Aces
7
14
Double Faults
3
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
40 of
66)
39%
(
16 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
43%
(
49 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
97)
107
Total Points Won
103
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Henry Searle
68%
(
60 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
4
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
6
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Brady
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
68%
(
81 of
119)
1st Serve %
61%
(
70 of
114)
3
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
6
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
39%
(
46 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
51 of
114)
124
Total Points Won
109
|
6-7(5) 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Reese Stalder Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Reese Stalder
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thanapet Chanta
Player
Reese Stalder
55%
(
54 of
99)
1st Serve %
48%
(
51 of
106)
2
Aces
18
8
Double Faults
10
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
36 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
106)
105
Total Points Won
100
|
7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Reese Stalder
Player
Ji Sung Nam
52%
(
43 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
37 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nick Hardt
Player
Reese Stalder
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
55%
(
44 of
80)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
80
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
Player
Reese Stalder
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
9
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Reese Stalder
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
85)
19
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
85%
(
46 of
54)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
25 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
27 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(4) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Strong Kirchheimer | Reese Stalder |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 55% (295/237) | 56% (73/58) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (681/547) | 54% (158/132) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (6100/5499) | 52% (1438/1323) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 55% (161/133) | 59% (70/49) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 56% (73/57) | 0% (0/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 56% (61/47) | 33% (3/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.33 | 0.2 |
| Aces Total | 1860 | 271 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 | 0.1 |
| Total Double Faults | 943 | 131 |
| Average Match Time | 1:25:42 | 1st Match |
| Average Opponent Rank | 452.68 | 409.78 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (18928/29430) | 60% (2239/3749) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 69% (13077/18928) | 68% (1533/2239) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (5467/10502) | 51% (764/1510) |
| Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (1149/2920) | 47% (127/273) |
| Return Points Win % | 39% (11702/30193) | 36% (1277/3512) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 44% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 45% (81/99) | 20% (1/4) |
| Futures W/L | 61% (210/133) | 57% (72/54) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (291/523) | 56% (72/128) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 25% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (75/153) | 46% (17/37) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 45% (74/165) | 58% (18/31) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (305/254) | 93% (68/63) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (305/50) | 7% (68/5) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (227/41) | 16% (63/10) |
See recent tennis photos of Kirchheimer and Stalder
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
