Strong Kirchheimer vs Karl Poling Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kirchheimer vs Poling analysis and find out who is favored!
Strong Kirchheimer vs Karl Poling Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kirchheimer has won 49.53% of points on his second serve, while Poling has won 37.76%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kirchheimer, in recent form, has won 48.98% of his opponent's second serve points, while Poling has won 45%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.95% and 35.06% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kirchheimer has saved 62.88% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Poling has saved 65.38% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kirchheimer has won 50% of matches played (W/L 27/ 27), with Poling winning 62.5% (W/L 10/ 6) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kirchheimer has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 53/ 40), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 147/ 115). Poling has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 17/ 14), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Kirchheimer has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.34% of matches (W/L 19/ 22), where as Poling has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 61.54% of matches (W/L 8/ 5). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kirchheimer winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Kirchheimer winning 2 and Poling winning 1. The last match between Kirchheimer and Poling was at the USA F12 (Vero Beach), 24-04-2018, First, Clay with Strong Kirchheimer getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:51:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kirchheimer and Poling have played a deciding set 1 times, with Kirchheimer winning 1 times and Poling 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Kirchheimer winning 1, and Poling 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kirchheimer has played against opponents with an average rank of 292.22 while Poling has played against players with an average rank of 93.13.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kirchheimer has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Poling has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kirchheimer has converted 42.24% of breakpoint opportunities, and Poling has converted 40% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kirchheimer 1 - 0 Poling
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
486
Rank
375
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
L
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
56% (272-211)
Career Total W/L
52% (32-29)
38% (5-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$3,990
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kirchheimer VS Poling H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Strong Kirchheimer | Karl Poling |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 17 | 15 |
Aces (Total) | 5 | 4 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 13 |
Avg Match Time | 2:51:0 | 2:51:0 |
1st Serve % | 62% (66/106) | 65% (66/101) |
1st Serve Win% | 64% (42/66) | 65% (43/66) |
2nd Serve Win% | 48% (19/40) | 34% (12/35) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 55% (6/11) | 36% (5/14) |
Return Points W% | 46% (46/101) | 42% (45/106) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Kirchheimer VS Poling H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 4-6 7-6(4) |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Karl Poling
62%
(
66 of
106)
1st Serve %
65%
(
66 of
101)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
13
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
43 of
66)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
42%
(
45 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
101)
107
Total Points Won
100
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Strong Kirchheimer | Karl Poling |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 38% (5/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 45% (15/18) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 47% (143/162) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.39 | 0 |
Aces Total | 57 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.27 | 0 |
DFs Total | 40 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:53:20 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 525.77 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 62% (615/996) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 69% (422/615) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 50% (191/381) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 39% (28/72) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 35% (330/941) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 42% (5/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (5/13) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 29% (2/7) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 43% (7/3) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 57% (7/4) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 33% (6/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Strong Kirchheimer Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
2-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Bogdan Bobrov
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
56%
(
57 of
102)
1st Serve %
72%
(
65 of
90)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
102
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Thomas Fancutt
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Adan Freire Da Silva
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
97)
6
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
7
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
41 of
55)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Clement Chidekh
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Kenny de Schepper
59%
(
69 of
117)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
101)
12
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
52 of
69)
60%
(
29 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
32%
(
37 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
32 of
101)
112
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(2) 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Henri Squire
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
54%
(
57 of
105)
9
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
105)
101
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
David Poljak
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
55%
(
51 of
93)
1st Serve %
56%
(
51 of
91)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
39 of
51)
62%
(
26 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
29 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
59%
(
57 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
63 of
112)
4
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
0
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
35%
(
34 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
112)
109
Total Points Won
100
|
3-6 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Zachary Svajda
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Karl Poling Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Mitchell Harper
Player
Karl Poling
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
9
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
30 of
37)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
57)
58
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Felix Corwin
Player
Karl Poling
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Karl Poling
Player
Noah Schachter
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
83)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Karl Poling
Player
Ryan Dickerson
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
51 of
67)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
36 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
102
Total Points Won
85
|
6-7(4) 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ryan Peniston
Player
Karl Poling
49%
(
42 of
85)
1st Serve %
73%
(
68 of
93)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
44 of
68)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
33 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
93)
90
Total Points Won
88
|
6-2 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Karl Poling
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Karl Poling
Player
Omni Kumar
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
52%
(
45 of
86)
7
Aces
6
8
Double Faults
5
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
34 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
88
Total Points Won
85
|
1-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gavin Young
Player
Karl Poling
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-0 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
QF |
Karl Poling
Player
David Krasner
47%
(
16 of
34)
1st Serve %
43%
(
15 of
35)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
81%
(
13 of
16)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
52
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more