Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Strong Kirchheimer vs Florian Lakat Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kirchheimer vs Lakat analysis and find out who is favored!
Strong Kirchheimer vs Florian Lakat Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kirchheimer has won 49.31% of points on his second serve, while Lakat has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kirchheimer, in recent form, has won 49.22% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lakat has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.28% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kirchheimer has saved 62.5% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lakat has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kirchheimer has won 50% of matches played (W/L 27/ 27), with Lakat winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kirchheimer has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 53/ 40), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 147/ 115). Lakat has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 67/ 39), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 16/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Kirchheimer has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.34% of matches (W/L 19/ 22), where as Lakat has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 1/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Kirchheimer winning 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Kirchheimer winning 4 and Lakat winning 1. The last match between Kirchheimer and Lakat was at the Canada F1 (Gatineau), 03-03-2018, Semifinals, I.hard with Strong Kirchheimer getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:51:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kirchheimer and Lakat have played a deciding set 1 times, with Kirchheimer winning 1 times and Lakat 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Kirchheimer winning 1, and Lakat 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kirchheimer has played against opponents with an average rank of 283 while Lakat has played against players with an average rank of 448.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kirchheimer has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lakat has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kirchheimer has converted 41.96% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lakat has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kirchheimer 2 - 0 Lakat
475
Rank
375
High
28
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
883
Rank
680
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
56% (272-210)
Career Total W/L
61% (128-83)
42% (5-7)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$3,990
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kirchheimer VS Lakat H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Strong Kirchheimer | Florian Lakat |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 29 | 18 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:30 | 1:51:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (86/132) | 61% (87/143) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (65/86) | 68% (59/87) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 59% (27/46) | 41% (23/56) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (8/14) | 60% (3/5) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (61/143) | 30% (40/132) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Kirchheimer VS Lakat H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Florian Lakat
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
55
Total Points Won
38
|
||||
| 7-6(2) 4-6 6-2 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Florian Lakat
63%
(
56 of
89)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
93)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
8
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
29 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
93)
98
Total Points Won
84
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Strong Kirchheimer | Florian Lakat |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 42% (5/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 47% (14/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (134/148) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.39 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 54 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 38 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:28 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 508.67 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (567/920) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (395/567) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (176/353) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (26/68) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (311/878) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 42% (5/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (2/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (6/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (6/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (6/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Strong Kirchheimer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Bogdan Bobrov
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
56%
(
57 of
102)
1st Serve %
72%
(
65 of
90)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
102
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Thomas Fancutt
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adan Freire Da Silva
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
97)
6
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
7
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
41 of
55)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Kenny de Schepper
59%
(
69 of
117)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
101)
12
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
52 of
69)
60%
(
29 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
32%
(
37 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
32 of
101)
112
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(2) 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Henri Squire
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
54%
(
57 of
105)
9
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
105)
101
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
55%
(
51 of
93)
1st Serve %
56%
(
51 of
91)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
39 of
51)
62%
(
26 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
29 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
59%
(
57 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
63 of
112)
4
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
0
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
35%
(
34 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
112)
109
Total Points Won
100
|
3-6 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zachary Svajda
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Evan Zhu
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
10
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Florian Lakat Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolas Colne
Player
Florian Lakat
56%
(
61 of
109)
1st Serve %
58%
(
47 of
81)
2
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
7
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
38 of
47)
67%
(
32 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
38 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
26 of
81)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Florian Lakat
Player
Alexandre Reco
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
12
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-4 20-18 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Filip Bergevi
Player
Florian Lakat
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve %
76%
(
35 of
46)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Florian Lakat
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Florian Lakat
Player
Jake Sands
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
73%
(
38 of
52)
8
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Florian Lakat
Player
Riley Smith
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 2-6 6-2 10-7 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Sadio Doumbia
Player
Florian Lakat
71%
(
82 of
115)
1st Serve %
78%
(
76 of
97)
0
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
6
50%
(
41 of
82)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
42 of
76)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
57 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
97)
102
Total Points Won
110
|
3-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petr Michnev
Player
Florian Lakat
68%
(
54 of
80)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
94)
13
Aces
20
2
Double Faults
6
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
79
|
6-1 6-7(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Kirchheimer Vs Lakat Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
