Stijn Slump vs Lambert Ruland Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Slump vs Ruland analysis and find out who is favored!
Stijn Slump vs Lambert Ruland Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Slump has won 53.42% of points on his second serve, while Ruland has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Slump, in recent form, has won 52.22% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ruland has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.53% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Slump has saved 64.44% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ruland has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Slump has won 64.71% of matches played (W/L 44/ 24), with Ruland winning 75% (W/L 9/ 3) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Slump has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 64/ 41), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 17/ 16). Ruland has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 17/ 12), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Slump has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.67% of matches (W/L 44/ 23), where as Ruland has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 9/ 3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Slump winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Slump winning 2 and Ruland winning 0. The last match between Slump and Ruland was at the M15 Eindhoven, 14-08-2022, Q1 round, Clay with Stijn Slump getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Slump and Ruland have played a deciding set 0 times, with Slump winning 0 times and Ruland 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Slump winning 0, and Ruland 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Slump has played against opponents with an average rank of 70.9 while Ruland has played against players with an average rank of 161.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Slump has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ruland has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Slump has converted 44.55% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ruland has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Slump 1 - 0 Ruland
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
813
Rank
813
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
58% (81-58)
Career Total W/L
57% (17-13)
73% (19-7)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Stijn Slump | Lambert Ruland |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 7 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 7-5 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Stijn Slump | Lambert Ruland |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 73% (19/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 69% (42/19) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 60% (332/224) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 78% (14/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.23 | 0 |
Aces Total | 63 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.21 | 0 |
DFs Total | 56 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 40.73 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 58% (768/1329) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 69% (528/768) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 54% (301/561) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 47% (70/149) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 43% (547/1283) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 73% (19/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 73% (19/26) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 56% (5/9) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 79% (19/15) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 21% (19/4) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 57% (7/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Stijn Slump Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Stijn Slump
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve %
52%
(
46 of
88)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
40 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Stijn Slump
Player
Gorazd Srbljak
57%
(
53 of
93)
1st Serve %
47%
(
44 of
93)
8
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
33 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
85
|
6-7(8) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Stijn Slump
Player
Ioan Alexandru Chirita
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Stijn Slump
Player
Sergio Badini
39%
(
23 of
59)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sebastian Gima
Player
Stijn Slump
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
F |
Stijn Slump
Player
Yanaki Milev
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
31%
(
28 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
85)
90
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
Stijn Slump
Player
Max Alcala Gurri
52%
(
47 of
91)
1st Serve %
72%
(
56 of
78)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Stijn Slump
Player
Gian Marco Moroni
51%
(
33 of
65)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
76)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Stijn Slump
Player
Stefan Adrian Andreescu
40%
(
17 of
42)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
94%
(
16 of
17)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Stijn Slump
Player
Andrea Fiorentini
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Lambert Ruland Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Damien Wenger
Player
Lambert Ruland
55%
(
54 of
99)
1st Serve %
65%
(
58 of
89)
5
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
3
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
58%
(
26 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
37 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
89)
104
Total Points Won
84
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Lambert Ruland
Player
Peter Buldorini
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Lambert Ruland
Player
Nico Jaeger
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Mathys Erhard
Player
Lambert Ruland
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Lambert Ruland
Player
Toby Alex Kodat
82%
(
50 of
61)
1st Serve %
76%
(
62 of
82)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Lambert Ruland
Player
Francesco Ferrari
56%
(
64 of
114)
1st Serve %
78%
(
66 of
85)
8
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
40 of
66)
46%
(
23 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
45 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
85)
105
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Lambert Ruland
Player
Siim Troost
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
2
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Hynek Barton
Player
Lambert Ruland
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H |
view more