Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Steven De Waard vs Mitchell Harper Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Waard vs Harper analysis and find out who is favored!
Steven De Waard vs Mitchell Harper Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Waard has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Harper has won 49.74%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Waard, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Harper has won 51.16%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 29.73% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Waard has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Harper has saved 47.92% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Waard has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Harper winning 46.43% (W/L 13/ 15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Waard has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 5/ 4), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 49% (W/L 41/ 42). Harper has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 49/ 42), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 21% (W/L 3/ 11).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Waard winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Waard winning 2 and Harper winning 0. The last match between Waard and Harper was at the Australia F6, 09-09-2013, Q2 round, Hard with Steven De Waard getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Waard and Harper have played a deciding set 0 times, with Waard winning 0 times and Harper 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Waard winning 0, and Harper 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Waard has played against opponents with an average rank of while Harper has played against players with an average rank of 68.64.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Waard has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Harper has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Waard has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Harper has converted 41.46% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Waard 1 - 0 Harper
Ret.
Rank
707
High
32
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
893
Rank
791
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
51% (66-64)
Career Total W/L
50% (57-58)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
47% (7-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Steven De Waard | Mitchell Harper |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 1 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-0 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Steven De Waard | Mitchell Harper |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 47% (7/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 44% (14/18) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (160/157) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (5/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.28 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 43 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.17 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 26 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:13:17 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 58.87 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 60% (489/813) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 62% (303/489) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 52% (168/324) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 47% (28/60) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 38% (302/801) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 55% (6/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 47% (7/15) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (6/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (6/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 11% (9/1) |
Steven De Waard Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats 
Renta Tokuda
Player
Steven De Waard
76%
(
69 of
91)
1st Serve %
51%
(
47 of
93)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
34%
(
31 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
83
|
5-7 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Steven De Waard
Player
Ruben Mccormack
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
100%
(
6 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Edward Bourchier
Player
Steven De Waard
62%
(
69 of
112)
1st Serve %
63%
(
68 of
108)
2
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
8
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
35%
(
39 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
108)
118
Total Points Won
102
|
6-2 6-7(5) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Harry Bourchier
Player
Steven De Waard
60%
(
65 of
108)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
101)
6
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
8
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
48 of
63)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
39 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
101)
104
Total Points Won
105
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Steven De Waard
Player
James Frawley
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
67)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Steven De Waard
Player
Chanchin Sookton-Eng
62%
(
69 of
112)
1st Serve %
52%
(
49 of
95)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
34%
(
38 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
34 of
95)
108
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(5) 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hugo Grenier
Player
Steven De Waard
62%
(
64 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
42%
(
43 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Steven De Waard
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Steven De Waard
Player
Thomas Fancutt
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Mitchell Harper Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Niels Villard
Player
Mitchell Harper
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
84)
7
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
84)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Simon Reveniau
Player
Mitchell Harper
53%
(
39 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
23 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
82
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mitchell Harper
Player
Leo Cohen Bacrie
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quinn Vandecasteele
Player
Mitchell Harper
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
45%
(
21 of
47)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mitchell Harper
Player
Toby Martin
57%
(
50 of
88)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
36 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
88
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 3-6 7-6(3) 10-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Trevor Svajda
Player
Mitchell Harper
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mitchell Harper
Player
Wally Thayne
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
72%
(
53 of
74)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Ivan Marrero Curbelo
Player
Mitchell Harper
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
49%
(
39 of
79)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
8
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(8) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Waard Vs Harper Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
