Steve Johnson vs Rik De Voest Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Johnson vs Voest analysis and find out who is favored!
Steve Johnson vs Rik De Voest Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Johnson has won 53.5% of points on his second serve, while Voest has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Johnson, in recent form, has won 46.96% of his opponent's second serve points, while Voest has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 23.63% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Johnson has saved 63.33% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Voest has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Johnson has won 56.25% of matches played (W/L 18/ 14), with Voest winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Johnson has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 232/ 177), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 54/ 50). Voest has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Johnson has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 68.18% of matches (W/L 15/ 7), where as Voest has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Johnson has played against opponents with an average rank of 306.56 while Voest has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Johnson has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Voest has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Johnson has converted 21.62% of breakpoint opportunities, and Voest has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Johnson 0 - 0 Voest
15
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
34
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
43
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Steve Johnson | Rik De Voest |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 40% (2/3) | 1st Match |
Sets Win/Loss | 42% (5/7) | 1st Match |
Games Win/Loss | 48% (60/64) | 1st Match |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 1st Match |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 1st Match |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Aces pg | 0.41 | 1st Match |
Aces Total | 25 | 1st Match |
DFs per game | 0.23 | 1st Match |
DFs Total | 14 | 1st Match |
Avg Match Time | 1:42:58 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 465.2 | 1st Match |
1st Serve % | 56% (220/390) | 1st Match |
1st Serve W% | 75% (165/220) | 1st Match |
2nd Serve W% | 55% (93/170) | 1st Match |
BPs Won% Total | 24% (8/34) | 1st Match |
Return Pts W% | 33% (127/387) | 1st Match |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 1st Match |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Main Tour W/L | 50% (2/2) | 1st Match |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (2/5) | 1st Match |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 1st Match |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 1st Match |
1st set W, W | 67% (3/2) | 1st Match |
1st set W, L | 33% (3/1) | 1st Match |
1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 1st Match |
Steve Johnson Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Emilio Nava
Player
Steve Johnson
60%
(
71 of
118)
1st Serve %
56%
(
70 of
126)
15
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
7
82%
(
58 of
71)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
50 of
70)
47%
(
22 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
32%
(
38 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
45 of
126)
125
Total Points Won
119
|
6-7(6) 7-6(10) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Steve Johnson
45%
(
30 of
66)
1st Serve %
49%
(
34 of
70)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Christopher Eubanks
Player
Steve Johnson
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
10
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Steve Johnson
Player
Terence Atmane
65%
(
55 of
85)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
9
Aces
19
2
Double Faults
2
87%
(
48 of
55)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
44 of
58)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
17 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
28 of
90)
96
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Steve Johnson
Player
Timo Stodder
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
8
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Michael Mmoh
Player
Steve Johnson
70%
(
60 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
84)
9
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
27 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
SF |
Nishesh Basavareddy
Player
Steve Johnson
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
53%
(
51 of
96)
5
Aces
11
5
Double Faults
6
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
96)
94
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Steve Johnson
Player
Christian Harrison
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
55%
(
22 of
40)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Steve Johnson
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
21 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Steve Johnson
Player
Bernard Tomic
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
12
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 1-6 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Rik De Voest Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Thanasi Kokkinakis
Player
Rik de Voest
65%
(
63 of
97)
1st Serve %
57%
(
65 of
115)
9
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
1
81%
(
51 of
63)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
31 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
44 of
115)
110
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Rik de Voest
Player
Jason Jung
61%
(
70 of
114)
1st Serve %
66%
(
76 of
116)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
52 of
76)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
42 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
43 of
116)
115
Total Points Won
115
|
4-6 7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
R2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
SF | 7-5 4-2 ret. | H2H | |||
R1 |
Luke Saville
Player
Rik de Voest
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Rik de Voest
Player
Karol Beck
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
51%
(
50 of
98)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
10
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
17 of
48)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
1-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Rik de Voest
Player
Mao-Xin Gong
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Rik de Voest
Player
Min-Hyoek Cho
62%
(
68 of
109)
1st Serve %
70%
(
64 of
92)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
41%
(
45 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
92)
101
Total Points Won
100
|
3-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H |
view more