search

Stephan Fransen vs Tim VAN DER Horst Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fransen vs Horst analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Stephan Fransen vs Tim VAN DER Horst Important H2H Prediction Stats:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fransen has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Horst has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fransen, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Horst has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Fransen has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Horst has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Fransen has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Horst winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Fransen has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 46% (W/L 12/ 14), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Horst has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fransen has played against opponents with an average rank of while Horst has played against players with an average rank of .
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fransen has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Horst has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Fransen has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Horst has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
bet365

Head-to-head: Fransen 0 - 0 Horst

Stephan Fransen

0

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

0

Minor

N/A

Rank

High

35

Age

Plays

0

Total

0

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

N/A

Rank

High

28

Age

Plays

Tim VAN DER Horst

0

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

0

Minor

0

Total

0

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

W W L L W L L L W L

Form

Career Total W/L

YTD W/L

$0

Career Prize Money

$0

YTD Titles

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

Fransen VS Horst H2h Matches played

No H2H Matches Available

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Stephan Fransen Tim VAN DER Horst
YTD W/L 0% (0/0) 1st Match
Sets Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 1st Match
Games Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 1st Match
Hard Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 1st Match
Clay Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 1st Match
Indoor Hard W/L 0% (0/0) 1st Match
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 1st Match
Aces pg 0 1st Match
Aces Total 0 1st Match
DFs per game 0 1st Match
DFs Total 0 1st Match
Avg Match Time 1st Match 1st Match
Avg Opp Rank 0 1st Match
1st Serve % 0% (0/0) 1st Match
1st Serve W% 0% (0/0) 1st Match
2nd Serve W% 0% (0/0) 1st Match
BPs Won% Total 0% (0/0) 1st Match
Return Pts W% 0% (0/0) 1st Match
Slam W/L 0% (0/0) 1st Match
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 1st Match
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 1st Match
Main Tour W/L 0% (0/0) 1st Match
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 1st Match
Challenger W/L 0% (0/0) 1st Match
Futures W/L 0% (0/0) 1st Match
Best of 3 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 1st Match
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 1st Match
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 1st Match
Deciding Set W% 0% (0/0) 1st Match
1st set W, W 0% (0/0) 1st Match
1st set W, L 0% (0/0) 1st Match
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 1st Match

Stephan Fransen Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
R2
cross
Justin Butsch
Player
Stephan Fransen
60% ( 30 of 50)
1st Serve %
66% ( 45 of 68)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
67% ( 20 of 30)
1st Serve Won
51% ( 23 of 45)
60% ( 12 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 11 of 23)
63% ( 5 of 8)
Break Points Won
100% ( 2 of 2)
36% ( 18 of 50)
Rtn Points Won
50% ( 34 of 68)
66
Total Points Won
52
L
6-4 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Stephan Fransen
Player
Roland Stuurman
67% ( 35 of 52)
1st Serve %
66% ( 40 of 61)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
83% ( 29 of 35)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 25 of 40)
76% ( 13 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 10 of 21)
38% ( 3 of 8)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
19% ( 10 of 52)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 26 of 61)
68
Total Points Won
45
W
6-0 7-6(2) H2H
R1
cross
Philipp Schroll
Player
Stephan Fransen
63% ( 36 of 57)
1st Serve %
61% ( 36 of 59)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
75% ( 27 of 36)
1st Serve Won
69% ( 25 of 36)
52% ( 11 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
30% ( 7 of 23)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
33% ( 19 of 57)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 27 of 59)
65
Total Points Won
51
L
6-4 6-2 H2H
Q1
cross
Marvin Netuschil
Player
Stephan Fransen
75% ( 49 of 65)
1st Serve %
61% ( 39 of 64)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
51% ( 25 of 49)
1st Serve Won
46% ( 18 of 39)
50% ( 8 of 16)
2nd Serve Won
36% ( 9 of 25)
58% ( 7 of 12)
Break Points Won
42% ( 5 of 12)
49% ( 32 of 65)
Rtn Points Won
58% ( 37 of 64)
70
Total Points Won
59
L
6-4 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Stephan Fransen
60% ( 26 of 43)
1st Serve %
50% ( 23 of 46)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
96% ( 25 of 26)
1st Serve Won
57% ( 13 of 23)
65% ( 11 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
61% ( 14 of 23)
60% ( 3 of 5)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
16% ( 7 of 43)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 19 of 46)
55
Total Points Won
34
L
6-3 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Stephan Fransen
Player
Adam Jones
73% ( 49 of 67)
1st Serve %
64% ( 49 of 76)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
71% ( 35 of 49)
1st Serve Won
57% ( 28 of 49)
67% ( 12 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
59% ( 16 of 27)
50% ( 2 of 4)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
30% ( 20 of 67)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 32 of 76)
79
Total Points Won
64
W
7-6(4) 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Denys Klok
Player
Stephan Fransen
55% ( 27 of 49)
1st Serve %
60% ( 28 of 47)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
2
78% ( 21 of 27)
1st Serve Won
54% ( 15 of 28)
68% ( 15 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
53% ( 10 of 19)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
27% ( 13 of 49)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 22 of 47)
58
Total Points Won
38
L
6-3 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
Clement Geens
Player
Stephan Fransen
80% ( 43 of 54)
1st Serve %
54% ( 36 of 67)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
60% ( 26 of 43)
1st Serve Won
53% ( 19 of 36)
73% ( 8 of 11)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 12 of 31)
38% ( 5 of 13)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
37% ( 20 of 54)
Rtn Points Won
54% ( 36 of 67)
70
Total Points Won
51
L
6-3 6-3 H2H
R2
cross
Stephan Fransen
Player
Marc Giner
59% ( 60 of 102)
1st Serve %
52% ( 48 of 93)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
67% ( 40 of 60)
1st Serve Won
73% ( 35 of 48)
57% ( 24 of 42)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 19 of 45)
55% ( 6 of 11)
Break Points Won
33% ( 3 of 9)
37% ( 38 of 102)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 39 of 93)
103
Total Points Won
92
W
6-7(4) 6-1 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Stephan Fransen
Player
Dax Donders
56% ( 29 of 52)
1st Serve %
59% ( 35 of 59)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
76% ( 22 of 29)
1st Serve Won
54% ( 19 of 35)
57% ( 13 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 12 of 24)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
33% ( 17 of 52)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 28 of 59)
63
Total Points Won
48
W
6-2 6-4 H2H

Tim VAN DER Horst Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
QF
cross
Piotr Grynkowski
Player
Tim Van Der Horst
66% ( 29 of 44)
1st Serve %
78% ( 38 of 49)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
86% ( 25 of 29)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 22 of 38)
47% ( 7 of 15)
2nd Serve Won
36% ( 4 of 11)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
27% ( 12 of 44)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 23 of 49)
55
Total Points Won
38
L
6-2 6-2 H2H
Q1
L
6-1 3-6 10-5 H2H
QF
cross
Christian Samuelsson
Player
Tim Van Der Horst
65% ( 34 of 52)
1st Serve %
67% ( 44 of 66)
13
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
85% ( 29 of 34)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 28 of 44)
67% ( 12 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
55% ( 12 of 22)
22% ( 2 of 9)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
21% ( 11 of 52)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 26 of 66)
67
Total Points Won
51
L
6-3 6-4 H2H
Q1
L
6-2 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Niklas Schell
Player
Tim Van Der Horst
80% ( 44 of 55)
1st Serve %
67% ( 34 of 51)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
80% ( 35 of 44)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 22 of 34)
55% ( 6 of 11)
2nd Serve Won
53% ( 9 of 17)
75% ( 3 of 4)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
25% ( 14 of 55)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 20 of 51)
61
Total Points Won
45
L
6-4 6-2 H2H
QF
L
6-4 6-0 H2H
Q1
cross
Tim Van Der Horst
Player
Ingo Herzgerodt
64% ( 34 of 53)
1st Serve %
57% ( 48 of 84)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
85% ( 29 of 34)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 29 of 48)
63% ( 12 of 19)
2nd Serve Won
58% ( 21 of 36)
18% ( 2 of 11)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
23% ( 12 of 53)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 34 of 84)
75
Total Points Won
62
L
6-4 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Dominik Boehler
Player
Tim Van Der Horst
50% ( 23 of 46)
1st Serve %
67% ( 34 of 51)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
96% ( 22 of 23)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 20 of 34)
57% ( 13 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 7 of 17)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
24% ( 11 of 46)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 24 of 51)
59
Total Points Won
38
L
6-1 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Tim Van Der Horst
Player
Romain Gales
63% ( 22 of 35)
1st Serve %
63% ( 38 of 60)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
86% ( 19 of 22)
1st Serve Won
42% ( 16 of 38)
54% ( 7 of 13)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 10 of 22)
40% ( 6 of 15)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
26% ( 9 of 35)
Rtn Points Won
57% ( 34 of 60)
60
Total Points Won
35
L
6-3 6-0 H2H
R1
cross
Kuzey Cekirge
Player
Tim Van Der Horst
58% ( 38 of 65)
1st Serve %
54% ( 26 of 48)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
9
61% ( 23 of 38)
1st Serve Won
42% ( 11 of 26)
48% ( 13 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
32% ( 7 of 22)
67% ( 6 of 9)
Break Points Won
29% ( 2 of 7)
45% ( 29 of 65)
Rtn Points Won
63% ( 30 of 48)
66
Total Points Won
47
L
6-3 6-1 H2H

Fransen Vs Horst Prediction H2H Images To Share

Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions