Stefanie Voegele vs Ena Shibahara Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W L L L L L L
Form
L W L L W L W W L LHead To Head: Voegele 0 - 1 Shibahara
They have played 2 sets in total, with Voegele winning 0 and Shibahara winning 2. The last match between Voegele and Shibahara was at the Wimbledon - London, 24-06-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Grass, with Ena Shibahara getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Stefanie Voegele | 0 |
| Ena Shibahara | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Wimbledon - London(24-06-2025)
Ena Shibahara
Stefanie Voegele
6
4
6
4
| Voegele | Stats | Shibahara |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-4) | YTD Win/Loss | 53% (21-19) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 897 | Ranking | 120 |
| 42 | Highest Rank | 119 |
| 35 | Age | 27 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 8 | Titles | 1 |
| 52% (470-427) | Career Total W/L | 59% (158-112) |
| $1,226,886 | Career Prize Money | $250,548 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Avanesyan VS Prisacariu PREDICTION Clay
UniCredit Iasi Open - Iasi wta
14 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Gaston VS Tseng PREDICTION Clay
Nordea Open - Bastad atp
13 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Ena Shibahara
Player
Stefanie Voegele
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
9
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 8 | Games Won | 12 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:14:0 | Average Match Time | 1:14:0 |
| 57% (35/61) | 1st Serve % | 64% (41/64) |
| 71% (25/35) | 1st Serve Win % | 83% (34/41) |
| 50% (13/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (11/23) |
| 0% (0/3) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (2/6) |
| 30% (19/64) | Return Points Win % | 38% (23/61) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Voegele vs Shibahara Match Preview :
- In recent form, Shibahara excels with a 47.37% success rate on their second serve compared to Voegele's 29.09%. Is second serve performance crucial for match predictions? The stats suggest it is.
- Shibahara outperforms in return games, especially against opponents' second serves, winning 49.27% of points compared to Voegele's 42.86%.
- First serve return success is slightly in Shibahara's favor at 31.02% versus Voegele's 28.57%, a useful indicator of which player might be favored.
- Under pressure, such as when facing breakpoints, Voegele edges slightly ahead, saving 55%, while Shibahara saves 51.04%.
- In the past year, Shibahara has demonstrated far superior overall performance, winning 60.61% of matches compared to Voegele's 0% success rate.
- Both players perform best on indoor hard courts, but Shibahara succeeds more often with a 67% win rate compared to Voegele's 59%.
- Shibahara has played more at high-level tournaments, winning 61.29% of matches at this level, a stark contrast to Voegele, who has not won a match.
- Voegele's opponents have been slightly higher ranked on average (213.67) compared to those of Shibahara (230.52).
- If the match stretches into a deciding set, Shibahara's 55% success rate gives them a significant edge over Voegele, who has yet to win a deciding set.
- Voegele shows remarkable efficacy in breakpoint conversion, achieving 85.71% compared to 36.12% for Shibahara.
Editorial Prediction (June 24, 2025, UTC):
Shibahara displays superior recent performance, particularly in the crucial aspect of second serve points and return games. This could play a pivotal role in turning the match in their favor.
Voegele, while capable, has struggled to convert performance into wins over the past year, especially against less challenging opponents.
The tendency for Shibahara to win deciding sets is another compelling factor potential swing in their favor.
Although Voegele shows strong breakpoint conversion, it may not be sufficient to counteract Shibahara's overall form and consistency.
Considering these factors, Shibahara is likely the favorite to win this upcoming match.
Voegele vs Shibahara Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Stefanie Voegele Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Stefanie Voegele
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
9
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ella Seidel
Player
Stefanie Voegele
48%
(
31 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
85)
1
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
76
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Stefanie Voegele
45%
(
18 of
40)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denise Valente
Player
Stefanie Voegele
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
71%
(
47 of
66)
3
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
1
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jodie Anna Burrage
Player
Stefanie Voegele
63%
(
70 of
111)
1st Serve %
59%
(
68 of
116)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
9
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
40 of
68)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
44%
(
49 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
56 of
116)
118
Total Points Won
109
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Stefanie Voegele
Player
Mariam Bolkvadze
51%
(
44 of
87)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
89)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
11
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
36 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Diana Marcinkevica
Player
Stefanie Voegele
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Ena Shibahara Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Haley Giavara
Player
Ena Shibahara
68%
(
57 of
84)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
81)
2
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Ena Shibahara
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Marina Bassols Ribera
64%
(
85 of
132)
1st Serve %
58%
(
71 of
122)
13
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
9
69%
(
59 of
85)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
48 of
71)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
38%
(
50 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
50 of
122)
132
Total Points Won
122
|
7-6(5) 6-7(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Stefanie Voegele
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
9
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Ena Shibahara
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
98)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
92
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Alize Cornet
67%
(
74 of
111)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
93)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
41%
(
46 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Heather Watson
Player
Ena Shibahara
51%
(
46 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
4
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
2
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
100
Total Points Won
87
|
6-1 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nuria Parrizas-Diaz
Player
Ena Shibahara
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
55%
(
21 of
38)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52% (470/427) | Win/Loss | 59% (158/112) |
| 51% (1072/1011) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (356/273) |
| 51% (9866/9511) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (3081/2721) |
| 53% (194/174) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (109/77) |
| 52% (151/142) | Clay Win/Loss | 53% (17/15) |
| 60% (112/76) | Indoor Hard W/L | 69% (24/11) |
| 27% (13/35) | Grass Win/Loss | 47% (8/9) |
| 0.21 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
| 1941 | Aces Total | 684 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 1556 | Total Double Faults | 676 |
| 1:1:6 | Average Match Time | 1:26:1 |
| 493.5 | Average Opponent Rank | 412.28 |
| 57% (26046/45568) | 1st Serve % | 62% (9702/15578) |
| 64% (16731/26046) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (6268/9682) |
| 45% (8810/19522) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (2868/5952) |
| 45% (2447/5482) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (812/1801) |
| 44% (19974/45304) | Return Points Win % | 44% (6870/15710) |
| 42% (44/60) | Slam W/L | 64% (7/4) |
| 44% (35/45) | Masters W/L | 43% (3/4) |
| 31% (5/11) | Cups W/L | 75% (3/1) |
| 50% (154/156) | Main Tour W/L | 43% (20/26) |
| 58% (207/147) | Challenger W/L | 62% (125/77) |
| 76% (25/8) | Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (462/883) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (155/265) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 44% (93/210) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (35/60) |
| 54% (160/299) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (51/94) |
| 87% (453/394) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (157/136) |
| 13% (453/59) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (157/20) |
| 17% (444/74) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (113/21) |
Voegele vs. Shibahara Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
