Stefania Rogozinska Dzik vs Emma Van Poppel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W L W W W W L
Form
L W L W L L L L W LHead-To-Head: Dzik 1 - 0 Poppel
They have played 2 sets in total, with Dzik winning 2 and Poppel winning 0. The last match between Dzik and Poppel was at the W35 Santo Domingo, 18-11-2024, First, Hard with Stefania Rogozinska Dzik getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Stefania Rogozinska Dzik | 1 |
| Emma Van Poppel | 0 |
W35 Santo Domingo(18-11-2024)
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Minaur VS Fonseca PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
24 Mar 2025 / Third
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Fils VS Tiafoe PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
24 Mar 2025 / Third
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Stefania Rogozinska Dzik
Player
Emma Van Poppel
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
12
Games Won
3
0
Aces (Total)
2
3
Total Double Faults
4
1:26:0
Average Match Time
1:26:0
67% (39/58)
1st Serve %
61% (30/49)
64% (25/39)
1st Serve Win %
53% (16/30)
58% (11/19)
2nd Serve Win %
26% (5/19)
83% (5/6)
Break Points Won % (Total)
25% (1/4)
57% (28/49)
Return Points Win %
38% (22/58)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Stefania Rogozinska Dzik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Kayla Cross
Player
Stefania Rogozinska Dzik
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
12 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefania Rogozinska Dzik
Player
Victoria Osuigwe
88%
(
64 of
73)
1st Serve %
76%
(
60 of
79)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
22%
(
2 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
47%
(
34 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefania Rogozinska Dzik
Player
Anastasia Tikhonova
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve %
41%
(
22 of
54)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
9
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
46%
(
28 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefania Rogozinska Dzik
Player
Jenna Defalco
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
57%
(
12 of
21)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
22%
(
4 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
20)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
59%
(
23 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
38 of
53)
54
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Carlota Martinez Cirez
Player
Stefania Rogozinska Dzik
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
81%
(
67 of
83)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefania Rogozinska Dzik
Player
Lilian Poling
68%
(
54 of
79)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
48%
(
38 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 7-5 10-6 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stephanie Judith Visscher
Player
Stefania Rogozinska Dzik
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve %
74%
(
55 of
74)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
18 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefania Rogozinska Dzik
Player
Emma Van Poppel
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Laura Samson
Player
Stefania Rogozinska Dzik
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
17 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Emma Van Poppel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emma Van Poppel
Player
Uxue Azurza Frade
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Thessy Ntondele Zinga
Player
Emma Van Poppel
54%
(
37 of
69)
1st Serve %
49%
(
31 of
63)
0
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
6
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jenny Duerst
Player
Emma Van Poppel
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valeria Bhunu
Player
Emma Van Poppel
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nehira Sanon
Player
Emma Van Poppel
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
12
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emma Van Poppel
Player
Ester Mohamed Nankulange
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
36%
(
14 of
39)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ksenia Laskutova
Player
Emma Van Poppel
45%
(
21 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
8
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
77%
(
20 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emma Van Poppel
Player
Anouk Vandevelde
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
45%
(
25 of
56)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
15
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
52%
(
30 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
54
|
2-6 6-1 10-7 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shiho Akita
Player
Emma Van Poppel
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
50%
(
20 of
40)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
64%
(
14 of
22)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
53% (58/52)
Win/Loss
27% (42/115)
50% (121/119)
Sets Win/Loss
30% (106/242)
49% (1068/1100)
Games Win/Loss
41% (1322/1886)
57% (35/26)
Hard Win/Loss
26% (25/71)
51% (22/21)
Clay Win/Loss
28% (15/38)
17% (1/5)
Indoor Hard W/L
25% (2/6)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.06
Aces Per Game
0.11
60
Aces Total
178
0.24
Double Faults Per Game
0.33
255
Total Double Faults
514
1:29:1
Average Match Time
1st Match
437.84
Average Opponent Rank
259.2
69% (3979/5784)
1st Serve %
57% (2989/5215)
55% (2196/3979)
1st Serve Win %
59% (1750/2989)
40% (731/1805)
2nd Serve Win %
38% (842/2226)
49% (373/756)
Break Points Won % (Total)
43% (203/474)
47% (2674/5718)
Return Points Win %
39% (1959/5051)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
48% (27/29)
Challenger W/L
32% (18/39)
58% (31/22)
Futures W/L
24% (24/76)
51% (55/107)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
26% (41/156)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
42% (8/19)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
37% (7/19)
61% (14/23)
Deciding Set Win %
34% (12/35)
88% (52/46)
1st Set Won, Won Match
72% (50/36)
12% (52/6)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
28% (50/14)
17% (58/10)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
6% (107/6)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
