Stefan Latinovic vs Joe Leather Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L L W W L L L
Form
W W L W W L W L L LHead To Head: Latinovic 1 - 0 Leather
They have played 3 sets in total, with Latinovic winning 2 and Leather winning 1. The last match between Latinovic and Leather was at the M25 Vila Real de Santo Antonio, 17-02-2025, Q3, Hard with Stefan Latinovic getting the victory 2-6 6-2 10-8.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Stefan Latinovic | 1 |
| Joe Leather | 0 |
M25 Vila Real de Santo Antonio(17-02-2025)
2
6
6
2
10
8
| Latinovic | Stats | Leather |
|---|---|---|
| 40% (2-3) | YTD Win/Loss | 54% (7-6) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | N/A |
| Highest Rank | ||
| 25 | Age | 23 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 60% (65-43) | Career Total W/L | 64% (42-24) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Cerundolo VS Dimitrov PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
26 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Fritz VS Berrettini PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
27 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-2 10-8 |
Stats 
Stefan Latinovic
Player
Joe Leather
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
5
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
5
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
45%
(
26 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 16 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:30:57 | Average Match Time | 1:30:57 |
| 60% (35/58) | 1st Serve % | 59% (40/68) |
| 69% (24/35) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (20/40) |
| 35% (8/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (14/28) |
| 27% (3/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (3/3) |
| 50% (34/68) | Return Points Win % | 45% (26/58) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Stefan Latinovic vs Joe Leather Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Stefan Latinovic 1 - 0 Joe Leather
Predictions Insights for the Upcoming Tennis Match:
In terms of second serve performance in their recent form over the past six months, Latinovic has displayed a commendable ability, winning 49.92% of points on their second serve. Comparatively, Leather has achieved a slightly lower success rate of 45.12%. It is important to note the significant correlation between this statistical measure and match prediction accuracy.
When analyzing return game stats in recent form, Latinovic has proven to be formidable, winning 49.03% of their opponent's second serve points. On the other hand, Leather has achieved a slightly lower success rate of 46.92%. Similarly, when considering first serve returns, Latinovic has achieved a success rate of 34.47%, while Leather has managed 31.14%. These figures hold considerable importance in determining the favored position in their head-to-head matchup.
An assessment of how players perform under pressure reveals that Latinovic has saved a noteworthy 66.94% of breakpoints in recent form. In contrast, Leather has saved 51.64% of breakpoints, a statistic that proves to be useful for in-game betting predictions.
An overview of the performance of both players shows Latinovic winning 69.01% of matches played in the last year, with a win/loss record of 49/22. On the other hand, Leather has achieved a win rate of 68%, with a win/loss record of 34/16. These findings provide valuable insight into the overall head-to-head prediction.
When examining the players' performance on different surfaces, it becomes evident that Latinovic excels on clay, winning 62% of matches played on this surface (win/loss record of 51/31). Conversely, their performance on indoor hard courts has been less favorable, with a win rate of 0% in one match played. Leather, on the other hand, performs best on hard courts, with a win rate of 68% (win/loss record of 41/19). Their weakest performance is observed on clay courts with a win rate of 0% in one match played.
Assessing the level at which the players compete is crucial when predicting the favored player. In the past year, Latinovic has participated primarily in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments valued at $10K, winning 69.01% of matches (win/loss record of 49/22). Similarly, Leather has competed predominantly in the same level of tournaments, winning 68% of matches (win/loss record of 34/16). It should be noted that when comparing statistics between players, the event level at which they have been competing plays a pivotal role in determining the favorite.
Considering the opponents faced by both players over the last 12 months, the average rank of Latinovic's opponents is 187.55, indicating a higher level of competition. In contrast, the average rank of Leather's opponents stands at 43.66, suggesting a relatively lower level of competition.
When analyzing their performance in deciding sets, Latinovic has secured victory in 41% of deciding sets played over the last 12 months. In comparison, Leather has achieved a higher success rate of 67% in all matches played on the tour. For live predictions and betting, these figures hold significance in determining the outcome.
While considering past player performance is pertinent in predicting tennis matches, it is also essential to examine the current event statistics for players in top form. The current event statistics can be found in the section below (click here) if the players have taken part in a match in the ongoing event. It should be noted that certain players exhibit superior performance at specific events, and this should be taken into account when making predictions.
Examining recent form, it is noteworthy that Latinovic has converted 43.23% of breakpoint opportunities, while Leather has capitalized on 44.44% of their chances to break their opponent's serve. These statistics are vital for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
If you are interested in models that provide predictions for tennis matches, this article serves as a valuable resource (Warning: Stats geeks only).
Stefan Latinovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Stefan Latinovic
72%
(
58 of
81)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Cezar Cretu
Player
Stefan Latinovic
70%
(
78 of
111)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
102)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
8
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
41%
(
46 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
46 of
102)
111
Total Points Won
102
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefan Latinovic
Player
Joe Leather
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
5
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
5
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
45%
(
26 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
60
|
2-6 6-2 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Evgeny Philippov
Player
Stefan Latinovic
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefan Latinovic
Player
Johan Nikles
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
7
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefan Latinovic
Player
Pietro Orlando Fellin
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
12
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ioannis Kountourakis
Player
Stefan Latinovic
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
70%
(
65 of
93)
6
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
0%
(
0 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
30 of
93)
86
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 7-6(5) 10-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Joe Leather Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Stefan Latinovic
Player
Joe Leather
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
5
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
5
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
45%
(
26 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
60
|
2-6 6-2 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Joe Leather
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joe Leather
Player
Tomas Antonio Serrano Luis
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve %
67%
(
12 of
18)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
62%
(
13 of
21)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
20%
(
2 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
52%
(
16 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
22
Total Points Won
27
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-7(1) 6-0 10-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Joe Leather
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joe Leather
Player
Lucas Poullain
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve %
52%
(
12 of
23)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
0%
(
0 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
8 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
27
Total Points Won
25
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (65/43) | Win/Loss | 64% (42/24) |
| 59% (147/102) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (91/58) |
| 54% (1313/1121) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (807/674) |
| 56% (14/11) | Hard Win/Loss | 65% (41/22) |
| 62% (51/31) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 271 | Aces Total | 85 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 187 | Total Double Faults | 108 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 206.93 | Average Opponent Rank | 169.08 |
| 57% (1740/3070) | 1st Serve % | 66% (1485/2241) |
| 74% (1282/1740) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (964/1485) |
| 48% (637/1330) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (346/756) |
| 42% (129/304) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (67/144) |
| 39% (1225/3120) | Return Points Win % | 37% (747/2011) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 61% (65/42) | Futures W/L | 64% (42/24) |
| 60% (64/107) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (42/66) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (14/26) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (7/13) |
| 47% (16/34) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (10/17) |
| 88% (64/56) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (40/36) |
| 13% (64/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (40/4) |
| 20% (44/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (26/6) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
