Stefan Latinovic vs Bernabe Zapata Miralles Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L L L L L W L
Form
L W W W W W L L L LHead To Head: Latinovic 1 - 0 Miralles
They have played 3 sets in total, with Latinovic winning 2 and Miralles winning 1. The last match between Latinovic and Miralles was at the Bratislava 1 Challenger, 09-06-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Clay, with Stefan Latinovic getting the victory 6-7(1) 7-6(3) 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Stefan Latinovic | 1 |
| Bernabe Zapata Miralles | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Bratislava 1 Challenger(09-06-2025)
Stefan Latinovic
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
6
7
7
6
6
1
| Latinovic | Stats | Miralles |
|---|---|---|
| 33% (3-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 54% (22-19) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | 373 |
| Highest Rank | 37 | |
| 25 | Age | 28 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 0 | Titles | 13 |
| 59% (66-46) | Career Total W/L | 57% (433-332) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $1,252,255 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Ruud VS Cerundolo PREDICTION Clay
EFG Swiss Open - Gstaad atp
18 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Walton VS Duckworth PREDICTION Hard
Mifel Tennis Open - Los Cabos atp
18 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(1) 7-6(3) 6-1 |
Stats 
Stefan Latinovic
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
65%
(
71 of
110)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
101)
11
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
75%
(
53 of
71)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
48 of
69)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
39 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
101)
108
Total Points Won
103
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 19 | Games Won | 14 |
| 11 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:8:55 | Average Match Time | 2:8:55 |
| 65% (71/110) | 1st Serve % | 68% (69/101) |
| 75% (53/71) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (48/69) |
| 46% (18/39) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (16/32) |
| 44% (4/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (2/5) |
| 37% (37/101) | Return Points Win % | 35% (39/110) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Latinovic vs Miralles Match Preview :
- When considering recent second serve performance, Miralles has a slight edge, winning 43.38% over Latinovic's 42.26%. Could this marginal difference influence the outcome?
- Return game statistics show Miralles leading again by winning 51.64% of opponents’ second serve points compared to Latinovic's 48.32%.
- First serve return rates favor Miralles, who leads with 32.57%, narrowly surpassing Latinovic's 31.69%.
- Under pressure, both players exhibit similar abilities to save breakpoints, with Latinovic slightly ahead, saving 47.5% compared to Miralles' 47.14%.
- Latinovic has a stronger overall match win rate over the past year at 64.62% versus Miralles’ 52.54%.
- Both players excel on clay courts, although Miralles holds a slight advantage with a 62% career win rate compared to Latinovic's 61%.
- Latinovic has competed primarily at Futures/ITF $10K events with a higher win rate of 65.63%, whereas Miralles has faced tougher challengers at Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, resulting in a lower win rate of 45.83%.
- Latinovic has faced slightly higher-ranked opponents on average (207.69) compared to Miralles (290.31).
- In deciding sets, Miralles has a superior performance, winning 56% compared to Latinovic's 48% in such scenarios.
- Latinovic shows a slight advantage in breakpoint conversion at 41.38%, just ahead of Miralles’ 40.18%.
Editorial Prediction (June 9, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the statistical differences between Latinovic and Miralles reveals several key factors that might influence the outcome of their upcoming match.
Second serve performance and return game advantages generally lean towards Miralles, indicating a potential advantage in crucial points during rallies.
While Latinovic has experienced higher success in overall match wins over the past year, it's important to note that Miralles has competed more frequently against stronger competition at a higher level.
Additionally, Miralles' ability to perform under pressure in deciding sets could provide the edge if the match extends beyond the typical two sets.
Considering both players' strengths and weaknesses, as well as their track record on their preferred clay surface, Miralles appears to have a slight overall edge in this matchup.
Based on these insights, Miralles is more likely to emerge victorious in this upcoming tennis match.
Latinovic vs Miralles Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Stefan Latinovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Stefan Latinovic
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Stefan Latinovic
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
65%
(
71 of
110)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
101)
11
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
75%
(
53 of
71)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
48 of
69)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
39 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
101)
108
Total Points Won
103
|
6-7(1) 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vuk Radjenovic
Player
Stefan Latinovic
45%
(
27 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
37 of
70)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
9
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Dusan Obradovic
Player
Stefan Latinovic
55%
(
45 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
2
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
9
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
36 of
44)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
9 of
35)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
89
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Stefan Latinovic
72%
(
58 of
81)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Cezar Cretu
Player
Stefan Latinovic
70%
(
78 of
111)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
102)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
8
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
41%
(
46 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
46 of
102)
111
Total Points Won
102
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Bernabe Zapata Miralles Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Carlo Alberto Caniato
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
46%
(
11 of
24)
1st Serve %
83%
(
39 of
47)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
82%
(
9 of
11)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
6 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
38
Total Points Won
33
|
5-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Stefan Latinovic
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
65%
(
71 of
110)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
101)
11
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
75%
(
53 of
71)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
48 of
69)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
39 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
101)
108
Total Points Won
103
|
6-7(1) 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michael Agwi
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
26%
(
6 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Iliyan Radulov
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
80%
(
52 of
65)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
John Sperle
73%
(
79 of
108)
1st Serve %
64%
(
75 of
117)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
75)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
45%
(
49 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
53 of
117)
112
Total Points Won
113
|
1-6 7-6(5) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Tomas Curras Abasolo
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
79%
(
30 of
38)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
53%
(
16 of
30)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
53%
(
23 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
42
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (66/46) | Win/Loss | 57% (433/332) |
| 58% (150/109) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (971/788) |
| 54% (1358/1176) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (8419/7727) |
| 56% (14/11) | Hard Win/Loss | 49% (69/72) |
| 60% (52/34) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (314/192) |
| 0% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 42% (42/59) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 47% (8/9) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 300 | Aces Total | 1161 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 215 | Total Double Faults | 1248 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:17:6 |
| 230.26 | Average Opponent Rank | 446.79 |
| 57% (1920/3376) | 1st Serve % | 66% (29211/44078) |
| 74% (1417/1920) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (18539/29211) |
| 47% (686/1456) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (7288/14863) |
| 43% (136/318) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (2186/4713) |
| 39% (1327/3420) | Return Points Win % | 42% (17885/42653) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 54% (21/18) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 28% (7/18) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 46% (50/58) |
| 33% (1/2) | Challenger W/L | 54% (162/138) |
| 60% (65/44) | Futures W/L | 66% (192/99) |
| 59% (65/111) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (416/726) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 45% (10/22) |
| 54% (15/28) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (88/182) |
| 47% (17/36) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (116/215) |
| 88% (64/56) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (432/378) |
| 13% (64/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (432/54) |
| 21% (48/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (332/55) |
Latinovic vs. Miralles Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
