V. Azarenka
To Win
L. Siegemund
To Win
Sorana Cirstea vs Laura Siegemund Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W L W L L L
Form
L L L W L W L W W LHead-2-Head: Cirstea 3 - 1 Siegemund
They have played 10 sets in total, with Cirstea winning 7 and Siegemund winning 3. The last match between Cirstea and Siegemund was at the ATX Open - Austin, 26-02-2025, Round: First, Surface: Hard, with Sorana Cirstea getting the victory 6-3 0-6 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sorana Cirstea | 3 |
| Laura Siegemund | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: ATX Open - Austin(26-02-2025)
Sorana Cirstea
Laura Siegemund
6
3
0
6
6
1
| Cirstea | Stats | Siegemund |
|---|---|---|
| 44% (8-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 42% (10-14) |
| 3 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 168 | Ranking | 106 |
| 21 | Highest Rank | 27 |
| 35 | Age | 37 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 12 | Titles | 16 |
| 56% (537-428) | Career Total W/L | 59% (536-371) |
| $6,653,060 | Career Prize Money | $2,989,733 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Muller VS Safiullin PREDICTION Grass
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Darderi VS Giron PREDICTION Grass
Rothesay International - Eastbourne atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 0-6 6-1 |
Stats 
Sorana Cirstea
Player
Laura Siegemund
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
70%
(
53 of
76)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
30%
(
7 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Sorana Cirstea
Player
Laura Siegemund
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
| 4-6 7-5 7-5 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Sorana Cirstea
68%
(
79 of
117)
1st Serve %
52%
(
63 of
121)
0
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
5
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
46%
(
54 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
61 of
121)
124
Total Points Won
114
|
||||
| 6-4 7-6(9) |
Stats
Sorana Cirstea
Player
Laura Siegemund
60%
(
52 of
86)
1st Serve %
77%
(
64 of
83)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
37 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 7 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 53 | Games Won | 46 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 10 | Total Double Faults | 21 |
| 2:12:30 | Average Match Time | 2:12:30 |
| 60% (201/337) | 1st Serve % | 69% (239/345) |
| 60% (121/201) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (133/239) |
| 47% (64/136) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (49/106) |
| 45% (22/49) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (19/44) |
| 47% (163/345) | Return Points Win % | 45% (152/337) |
| 75% (3/4) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 25% (1/4) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 75% (4/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 25% (4/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (4/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Cirstea vs Siegemund Match Preview :
How does a player’s performance on their second serve influence predictions? In the recent six months, Laura Siegemund has won 43.6% of points on her second serve, contrasting Sorana Cirstea’s more effective 50.58% in this area. This seemingly subtle disparity in second serve performance could indicate who has the upper hand in upcoming matches, especially given how highly correlated this stat is with match outcomes.
And how do they fare when returning serves? Recent stats reveal that Siegemund has dominated her opponent's second serve points, winning 52.71%, while Cirstea is nearly neck-and-neck with 52.67%. However, in first serve return points, Siegemund edges out with 39.79%, as opposed to Cirstea’s 34.94%. These numbers suggest Siegemund's expertise at attacking the serve, especially the first serve, which can decide the favored player in head-to-head battles.
When under pressure, can these players maintain their cool? Siegemund has proven her composure by saving 51.56% of breakpoints, marginally outperforming Cirstea, who has saved 50.65%. Breakpoint resilience is crucial not just for the match, but also for in-game betting predictions. Over the past year, the overall performance further amplifies Siegemund’s edge, winning 55.77% of matches played (W/L 29/23) against Cirstea’s 37.5% (W/L 9/15).
Is there an advantage on specific surfaces that could swing the match prediction? Both players show prowess on clay, with Siegemund having a career win percentage of 65% (W/L 339/182) and Cirstea boasting 60% (W/L 191/125). Interestingly, both have their weakest stats on grass, with Siegemund holding a balanced 50% (W/L 13/13) and Cirstea slightly lower at 46% (W/L 36/42).
Could prior head-to-head clashes foreshadow the victor? Having clashed three times before, Cirstea leads with two victories over Siegemund’s one. These encounters have spanned seven sets, with Cirstea claiming five. Their last duel at the U.S. Open saw Cirstea triumph in straight sets, 6-4, 6-4, emphasizing her historical edge. In deciding sets, Siegemund’s singular win might stir hope if they face another tight finish.
But what of the quality of opponents they face? Over the past year, Siegemund’s average adversary ranked 128.35, whereas Cirstea contended against stiffer competition, averaging a rank of 70.13. Such context helps illuminate the task each player faces. Moreover, in matches going the distance, Cirstea has the upper hand, winning 57% of deciding sets compared to Siegemund’s 50% over the past year. Yet, break point conversions are almost at parity, with Siegemund at 41.34% and Cirstea slightly ahead at 42.67%.
Taking into account these stats, Cirstea’s consistent performance in prior encounters and her experience in high-caliber contests give her a slight edge. Nevertheless, a heated match awaits, sure to test both athletes, with Cirstea predicted to emerge victorious if they meet again. Let the games begin!
Cirstea vs Siegemund Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Sorana Cirstea Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Ajla Tomljanovic
Player
Sorana Cirstea
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
8
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hailey Baptiste
Player
Sorana Cirstea
56%
(
54 of
96)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
60%
(
25 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
33 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
38 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
94
|
6-2 5-7 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Danielle Rose Collins
Player
Sorana Cirstea
51%
(
31 of
61)
1st Serve %
75%
(
61 of
81)
4
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
1
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
44 of
61)
70%
(
21 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
23%
(
14 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
81)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sorana Cirstea
Player
Elisabetta Cocciaretto
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Sorana Cirstea
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
59%
(
58 of
99)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
99)
100
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sorana Cirstea
Player
Maya Joint
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mccartney Kessler
Player
Sorana Cirstea
65%
(
64 of
99)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
38 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
48 of
104)
109
Total Points Won
94
|
5-7 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sorana Cirstea
Player
Diana Shnaider
66%
(
69 of
104)
1st Serve %
66%
(
51 of
77)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
41 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
77)
93
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Laura Siegemund Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Laura Siegemund
61%
(
70 of
115)
1st Serve %
74%
(
81 of
109)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
47 of
81)
49%
(
22 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
40%
(
46 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
109)
114
Total Points Won
110
|
7-6(2) 4-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Ena Shibahara
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
98)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
92
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Hailey Baptiste
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
9 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Laura Siegemund
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
80%
(
51 of
64)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
32 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Lucia Bronzetti
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Laura Siegemund
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
45%
(
34 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Daria Saville
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (537/428) | Win/Loss | 59% (536/371) |
| 54% (1198/1032) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (1199/892) |
| 51% (10540/10039) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (10121/8982) |
| 56% (254/203) | Hard Win/Loss | 51% (140/134) |
| 60% (191/126) | Clay Win/Loss | 65% (341/187) |
| 50% (56/56) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53% (40/36) |
| 46% (36/43) | Grass Win/Loss | 52% (15/14) |
| 0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 1879 | Aces Total | 434 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 2245 | Total Double Faults | 1645 |
| 1:3:39 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 89.85 | Average Opponent Rank | 479.21 |
| 58% (31800/54828) | 1st Serve % | 70% (24088/34431) |
| 63% (20189/31800) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (14486/24088) |
| 45% (10435/23028) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (4780/10325) |
| 46% (2909/6391) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (2154/4530) |
| 44% (23630/53717) | Return Points Win % | 46% (16072/34798) |
| 52% (74/68) | Slam W/L | 51% (42/40) |
| 48% (94/101) | Masters W/L | 54% (49/42) |
| 65% (11/6) | Cups W/L | 57% (4/3) |
| 53% (221/196) | Main Tour W/L | 57% (144/110) |
| 68% (105/49) | Challenger W/L | 60% (239/157) |
| 80% (32/8) | Futures W/L | 75% (58/19) |
| 55% (525/947) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (528/894) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (2/4) |
| 55% (120/218) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (93/181) |
| 57% (178/314) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (152/284) |
| 87% (497/430) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (516/447) |
| 13% (497/66) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (516/69) |
| 22% (467/102) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (390/88) |
Cirstea vs. Siegemund Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
