Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sophie Chang vs Nao Hibino Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chang vs Hibino analysis and find out who is favored!
Sophie Chang vs Nao Hibino Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chang has won 40.93% of points on his second serve, while Hibino has won 44.48%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chang, in recent form, has won 54.75% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hibino has won 54.08%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.15% and 37.04% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chang has saved 49.75% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hibino has saved 54.13% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chang has won 43.75% of matches played (W/L 21/ 27), with Hibino winning 54.93% (W/L 39/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chang has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 115/ 97), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 30% (W/L 3/ 7). Hibino has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 15/ 11), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 43/ 49).
- Player level: In the last year, Chang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.51% of matches (W/L 20/ 23), where as Hibino has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 11/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Chang winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Chang winning 0 and Hibino winning 2. The last match between Chang and Hibino was at the W100 Charleston, 28-04-2022, Second, Clay with Nao Hibino getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:15:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chang and Hibino have played a deciding set 0 times, with Chang winning 0 times and Hibino 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Chang winning 0, and Hibino 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chang has played against opponents with an average rank of 243.1 while Hibino has played against players with an average rank of 202.28.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chang has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hibino has won 59% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chang has converted 51.58% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hibino has converted 48.73% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Chang 0 - 1 Hibino
382
Rank
217
High
26
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
85
Rank
56
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
50% (236-240)
Career Total W/L
56% (368-293)
56% (10-8)
YTD W/L
56% (14-11)
$41,315
Career Prize Money
$1,225,315
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Sophie Chang | Nao Hibino |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 4 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:15:0 | 1:15:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (30/55) | 79% (34/43) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 57% (17/30) | 68% (23/34) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 32% (8/25) | 78% (7/9) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 63% (5/8) |
| Return Points W% | 30% (13/43) | 55% (30/55) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Nao Hibino
Player
Sophie Chang
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sophie Chang | Nao Hibino |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (10/8) | 56% (14/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (22/19) | 51% (32/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (203/189) | 51% (290/274) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 55% (12/10) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 64% (7/4) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 100% (2/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.28 | 0.17 |
| Aces Total | 53 | 46 |
| DFs per game | 0.53 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 102 | 64 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:41 | 1:45:28 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 200.72 | 146.56 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (735/1304) | 67% (1239/1842) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (468/735) | 63% (778/1239) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (239/569) | 46% (276/603) |
| BPs Won% Total | 53% (84/160) | 47% (102/218) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (587/1265) | 44% (815/1869) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (8/4) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 25% (1/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 59% (10/7) | 50% (3/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (9/16) | 56% (14/25) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 40% (2/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 69% (9/13) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (10/9) | 75% (12/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (10/1) | 25% (12/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 38% (13/5) |
Sophie Chang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Sophie Chang
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
7
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
72%
(
28 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Claire Liu
Player
Sophie Chang
64%
(
62 of
97)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
104)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
42%
(
41 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
51 of
104)
107
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marina Bassols Ribera
Player
Sophie Chang
49%
(
24 of
49)
1st Serve %
43%
(
26 of
61)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
9 of
35)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
47%
(
23 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nahia Berecoechea
Player
Sophie Chang
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
4
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
8
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Leonie Kung
Player
Sophie Chang
66%
(
71 of
108)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
83)
0
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
8
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
36 of
47)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
46 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
96
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sophie Chang
Player
Lia Karatancheva
43%
(
21 of
49)
1st Serve %
53%
(
18 of
34)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sophie Chang
Player
Akasha Urhobo
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
3
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
46%
(
33 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
39 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sophie Chang
Player
Jaeda Daniel
56%
(
59 of
105)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
4
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
28%
(
13 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
75%
(
9 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
52%
(
55 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
43 of
74)
93
Total Points Won
86
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sophie Chang
Player
Lexington Reed
53%
(
38 of
72)
1st Serve %
58%
(
48 of
83)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
10
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
49%
(
35 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
47 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hailey Baptiste
Player
Sophie Chang
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Nao Hibino Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Nao Hibino
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 3 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Yulia Putintseva
74%
(
77 of
104)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
99)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Anna Danilina
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve %
69%
(
27 of
39)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Nao Hibino
65%
(
84 of
130)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
98)
6
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
46 of
70)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
46%
(
60 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
112
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Erika Andreeva
Player
Nao Hibino
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
49 of
74)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
105)
95
Total Points Won
97
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Harriet Dart
72%
(
66 of
92)
1st Serve %
46%
(
42 of
91)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
37 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Veronika Kudermetova
Player
Nao Hibino
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
73
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Venus Williams
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
10
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
92)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
2-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Su-Wei Hsieh
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Julia Riera
54%
(
50 of
92)
1st Serve %
47%
(
43 of
91)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
41 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Chang Vs Hibino Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
