Sophie Chang vs Gail Brodsky Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chang vs Brodsky analysis and find out who is favored!
Sophie Chang vs Gail Brodsky Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chang has won 39.57% of points on his second serve, while Brodsky has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chang, in recent form, has won 56.49% of his opponent's second serve points, while Brodsky has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.34% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chang has saved 48.31% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Brodsky has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chang has won 44.9% of matches played (W/L 22/ 27), with Brodsky winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chang has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 115/ 95), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 30% (W/L 3/ 7). Brodsky has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 22/ 11), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 4/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Chang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 47.73% of matches (W/L 21/ 23), where as Brodsky has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Chang winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Chang winning 1 and Brodsky winning 2. The last match between Chang and Brodsky was at the Landisville, 08-08-2018, First, Hard with Gail Brodsky getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:33:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chang and Brodsky have played a deciding set 1 times, with Chang winning 0 times and Brodsky 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Chang winning 0, and Brodsky 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chang has played against opponents with an average rank of 251.35 while Brodsky has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chang has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Brodsky has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chang has converted 52.11% of breakpoint opportunities, and Brodsky has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Chang 0 - 1 Brodsky
3
Total
0
Mast
2
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
378
Rank
217
High
26
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
182
High
32
Age
Plays
6
Total
0
Mast
2
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
Form
50% (236-238)
Career Total W/L
57% (146-110)
63% (10-6)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$41,315
Career Prize Money
$33,595
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Sophie Chang | Gail Brodsky |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
Games Won | 14 | 18 |
Aces (Total) | 8 | 4 |
DFs (Total) | 8 | 8 |
Avg Match Time | 2:33:0 | 2:33:0 |
1st Serve % | 54% (59/109) | 58% (54/93) |
1st Serve Win% | 63% (37/59) | 70% (38/54) |
2nd Serve Win% | 44% (22/50) | 51% (20/39) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 55% (6/11) |
Return Points W% | 38% (35/93) | 46% (50/109) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 5-7 7-5 |
Gail Brodsky
Player
Sophie Chang
58%
(
54 of
93)
1st Serve %
54%
(
59 of
109)
4
Aces
8
8
Double Faults
8
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
35 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
50 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
94
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Sophie Chang | Gail Brodsky |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 63% (10/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 58% (21/15) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 53% (179/159) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 78% (7/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.27 | 0 |
Aces Total | 44 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.55 | 0 |
DFs Total | 90 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:45:48 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 208.81 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 56% (634/1127) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 64% (407/634) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 41% (204/493) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 54% (76/141) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 48% (521/1089) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 63% (10/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (9/14) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 67% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 90% (10/9) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 10% (10/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 17% (6/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Sophie Chang Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Marina Bassols Ribera
Player
Sophie Chang
49%
(
24 of
49)
1st Serve %
43%
(
26 of
61)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
9 of
35)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
47%
(
23 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nahia Berecoechea
Player
Sophie Chang
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
4
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
8
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
F |
Leonie Kung
Player
Sophie Chang
66%
(
71 of
108)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
83)
0
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
8
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
36 of
47)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
46 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
96
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Sophie Chang
Player
Lia Karatancheva
43%
(
21 of
49)
1st Serve %
53%
(
18 of
34)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Sophie Chang
Player
Akasha Urhobo
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
3
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
46%
(
33 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
39 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sophie Chang
Player
Jaeda Daniel
56%
(
59 of
105)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
4
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
28%
(
13 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
75%
(
9 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
52%
(
55 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
43 of
74)
93
Total Points Won
86
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sophie Chang
Player
Lexington Reed
53%
(
38 of
72)
1st Serve %
58%
(
48 of
83)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
10
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
49%
(
35 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
47 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Hailey Baptiste
Player
Sophie Chang
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sophie Chang
Player
Tiphanie Lemaitre
47%
(
54 of
115)
1st Serve %
59%
(
63 of
107)
9
Aces
2
17
Double Faults
6
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
39%
(
24 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
46%
(
53 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
52 of
107)
114
Total Points Won
108
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Renata Zarazua
Player
Sophie Chang
74%
(
70 of
94)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
84)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
84)
93
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Gail Brodsky Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Junri Namigata
Player
Gail Brodsky
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
37%
(
16 of
43)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
45%
(
21 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
48
Total Points Won
42
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Katie Swan
Player
Gail Brodsky
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
58)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
14 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gail Brodsky
Player
En Shuo Liang
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Madison Brengle
Player
Gail Brodsky
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
91%
(
10 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Gail Brodsky
Player
Hiroko Kuwata
48%
(
51 of
107)
1st Serve %
73%
(
79 of
108)
8
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
47 of
79)
41%
(
23 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
44%
(
47 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
50 of
108)
110
Total Points Won
105
|
6-4 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gail Brodsky
Player
Abbie Myers
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mai Hontama
Player
Gail Brodsky
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
24 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Gergana Topalova
Player
Gail Brodsky
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve %
53%
(
20 of
38)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
50
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gail Brodsky
Player
Haley Giavara
46%
(
31 of
67)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Natalija Stevanovic
Player
Gail Brodsky
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve %
49%
(
39 of
80)
9
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
6
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
43%
(
33 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H |
view more