Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Solymar Colling vs Emilie LINDH Gallagher Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Colling vs Gallagher analysis and find out who is favored!
Solymar Colling vs Emilie LINDH Gallagher Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Colling has won 46.12% of points on his second serve, while Gallagher has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Colling, in recent form, has won 48.94% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gallagher has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.78% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Colling has saved 47.76% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gallagher has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Colling has won 41.38% of matches played (W/L 12/ 17), with Gallagher winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Colling has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 54/ 38), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Gallagher has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Colling has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 8/ 10), where as Gallagher has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Colling has played against opponents with an average rank of 94.45 while Gallagher has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Colling has won 71% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gallagher has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Colling has converted 32.2% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gallagher has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Colling 0 - 0 Gallagher
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Solymar Colling | Emilie LINDH Gallagher |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 38% (5/8) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 38% (11/18) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 45% (124/150) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 40% (4/6) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.04 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 6 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.07 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 9 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 171.23 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (98/163) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (63/98) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 40% (26/65) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 23% (5/22) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (69/177) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 25% (1/3) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 44% (4/5) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (5/13) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 1st Match |
Solymar Colling Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats 
Malkia Menguene
Player
Solymar Colling
72%
(
54 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 2-6 10-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Stephanie Judith Visscher
Player
Solymar Colling
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
8
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Solymar Colling
Player
Luana Plaza Araujo
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
4-6 6-1 10-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 2-6 7-6(5) 13-11 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Emilie LINDH Gallagher Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Emilie Lindh Gallagher
Player
Daria Khomutsianskaya
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
91)
3
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
8
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
48 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Xinyu Gao
Player
Emilie Lindh Gallagher
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
57
Total Points Won
47
|
7-6(3) 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilie Lindh Gallagher
Player
Francisca Jorge
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilie Lindh Gallagher
Player
Gergana Topalova
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
6
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
5
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
1-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Linda Klimovicova
Player
Emilie Lindh Gallagher
53%
(
51 of
97)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
7
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
37 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
97
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emilie Lindh Gallagher
Player
Maileen Nuudi
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
76%
(
63 of
83)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
26 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emilie Lindh Gallagher
Player
Georgia Pedone
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilie Lindh Gallagher
Player
Lisa Pigato
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
80%
(
59 of
74)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilie Lindh Gallagher
Player
Viktoria Morvayova
47%
(
32 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
91)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
19 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
87
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Colling Vs Gallagher Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
