J. Tjen
To Win
S. Park
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L W L L W WForm
W W L W W W W W W WThey have played 5 sets in total, with Park winning 3 and Reyngold winning 2. The last match between Park and Reyngold was at the W50 Ahmedabad, 28-02-2025, Round: Quarterfinals, Surface: Hard, with Sohyun Park getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Sohyun Park | 1 |
Ekaterina Reyngold | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W50 Ahmedabad(28-02-2025)
Park | Stats | Reyngold |
---|---|---|
67% (22-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 76% (26-8) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
305 | Ranking | 584 |
287 | Highest Rank | 226 |
22 | Age | 24 |
- | Plays | - |
7 | Titles | 3 |
61% (202-127) | Career Total W/L | 59% (163-111) |
$9,698 | Career Prize Money | $2,835 |
1 | YTD Titles | 2 |
1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
23 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
French Open - Paris atp
23 May 2025 / Q3
French Open - Paris atp
25 May 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-2 |
![]() ![]()
Sohyun Park
Player
Ekaterina Reyngold
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
26 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
6-2 4-6 6-0 |
![]() ![]()
Ekaterina Reyngold
Player
Sohyun Park
54%
(
40 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
66
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
3 | Sets Won | 2 |
20 | Games Won | 22 |
2 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
6 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
1:41:51 | Average Match Time | 1:41:51 |
63% (85/134) | 1st Serve % | 60% (90/151) |
61% (52/85) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (57/90) |
43% (21/49) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (26/61) |
42% (8/19) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 53% (9/17) |
45% (68/151) | Return Points Win % | 46% (61/134) |
50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
When it comes to playing under pressure, Reyngold and Park reveal contrasting approaches that tickle the stats sheets. Reyngold has a penchant for saving breakpoints at a 49.19% rate, while Park proves a smidge more impressive, saving 50.9%. That stat is like a golden ticket for those betting enthusiasts who want a thrilling ride. Meanwhile, when it comes to converting breakpoints, Reyngold seems to have a sly, cunning smile with a conversion rate of 40.17%, while Park trails slightly, converting 38.58% of their chances. These numbers might give you a clue if you love the nail-biting excitement of live betting.
Their head-to-head duels reveal that the battle is about as close as two sleepy tortoises racing to the end of the garden. Out of their only encounter which happened on the hard courts of W 25 Jerusalem, Reyngold triumphed with a 6-2 4-6 6-0 scoreline. But that wasn't a walk in the park; it lasted an average of 1:54:0 in terms of match duration, leaving us as sweaty as a desert marathon. And if you're wondering about those nail-biting deciders, Reyngold came out victorious in all of their single head-to-head deciding set battles. It's as if Park couldn’t find the clutch gear when it really mattered.
Now let's get down to the nitty-gritty, the stats that make tennis enthusiasts twitch with excitement! Over the past six months, Reyngold has been gallantly winning 38.98% of points on second serves. Park, on the flip side, came in slightly shy with a 38.49% success rate. When it comes to returning, Reyngold flexes a bit more muscle with 52.85% of their opponent's second serve points becoming theirs, while Park is doing the duck walk with 47.85%. Oddly, Reyngold seems to be practicing social distancing on first serves, winning 31.45% compared to Park's social butterfly-like 33.74%.
Now, what about their surfaces of choice? Reyngold swears allegiance to Indoor Hard, flaunting an impressive 65% win rate, while Clay presents a minor slump with a 53% success rate. Park, being more of a clay enthusiast, dances on the clay at a 64% winning rate. Grass, on the other hand, seems to be Park's slippery banana peel, balancing at a neat 50% but only after a single match.
Let's talk match experience. Over the last year, Reyngold has achieved an even split with a 50% win rate (W/L 23/23), while Park navigates slightly above water with 53.13% (W/L 34/30). Both players make for promising talent, slugging it out mostly in the mystical realm of Challengers/ITF tournaments over the $10K level. Reyngold holds a slight edge with a 53.85% claim, compared to Park’s 54.39%—it’s like comparing strawberries and raspberries; both are sweet and satisfying.
With all of this number crunching, witty banter, and statistical prowess, betting fans might find themselves predicting a grueling duel with Reyngold's name subtly illuminated as the probable victor, thanks to that sliver of extra charm and previous h2h experience. But remember, in a world where tennis balls bounce unpredictably, surprises are always lurking just out of sight!
Park vs Reyngold Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Sohyun Park
Player
Rina Saigo
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve %
70%
(
53 of
76)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
47%
(
26 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
44 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Sohyun Park
Player
Eudice Wong Chong
40%
(
18 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
23 of
38)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
53
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Chihiro Muramatsu
Player
Sohyun Park
70%
(
66 of
94)
1st Serve %
49%
(
40 of
82)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
41 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
82)
95
Total Points Won
81
|
6-7(3) 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Lizette Cabrera
Player
Sohyun Park
67%
(
79 of
118)
1st Serve %
56%
(
62 of
110)
0
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
6
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
31%
(
12 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
47%
(
56 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
57 of
110)
119
Total Points Won
109
|
6-7(7) 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Sohyun Park
Player
Mutsumi Uemura
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
77)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
40 of
77)
85
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Talia Gibson
Player
Sohyun Park
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
42%
(
34 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Sohyun Park
Player
Sara Saito
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Sohyun Park
Player
Eunhye Lee
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
97)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
9
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
97)
95
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
F |
![]() ![]()
Ekaterina Reyngold
Player
Wushuang Zheng
60%
(
66 of
110)
1st Serve %
69%
(
86 of
125)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
47 of
86)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
45%
(
49 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
61 of
125)
122
Total Points Won
113
|
4-6 7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Ekaterina Reyngold
Player
Hong Yi Cody Wong
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
14 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Ekaterina Reyngold
Player
Yeon Woo Ku
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
79%
(
60 of
76)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
46%
(
31 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Ekaterina Reyngold
Player
Eunhye Lee
70%
(
52 of
74)
1st Serve %
72%
(
54 of
75)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
49%
(
36 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Ekaterina Reyngold
Player
Misaki Matsuda
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
72%
(
47 of
65)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Ekaterina Reyngold
Player
Ha Eum Lee
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
54
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Chihiro Muramatsu
Player
Ekaterina Reyngold
74%
(
63 of
85)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
38 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
79
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
61% (202/127) | Win/Loss | 59% (163/111) |
57% (432/320) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (354/255) |
53% (3602/3139) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (3010/2580) |
61% (113/73) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (78/49) |
64% (76/43) | Clay Win/Loss | 55% (53/43) |
55% (12/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 63% (32/19) |
50% (1/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.19 |
312 | Aces Total | 512 |
0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.4 |
785 | Total Double Faults | 1100 |
1:35:23 | Average Match Time | 1:28:48 |
464.06 | Average Opponent Rank | 459.75 |
60% (12057/19950) | 1st Serve % | 64% (10248/16007) |
60% (7206/12057) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (6295/10248) |
45% (3521/7893) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (2567/5759) |
50% (1370/2722) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1070/2154) |
49% (9594/19681) | Return Points Win % | 47% (7793/16429) |
0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) |
46% (6/7) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
33% (3/6) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (2/2) |
61% (135/88) | Challenger W/L | 60% (106/72) |
69% (58/26) | Futures W/L | 60% (55/36) |
62% (199/323) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (158/264) |
33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
55% (29/53) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (31/55) |
70% (66/94) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (40/74) |
92% (184/170) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (158/140) |
8% (184/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (158/18) |
21% (145/31) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (113/22) |